|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Post #1 Sun, Jul 6, 3:58 AM |
|
HSVnot4ME
Senior Member - 324
 |
Now, Saab has the Aero in both the 9-3 and 9-5. The difference between them is 0.3 L diff in displacement and a diff turbo (not necessarily better).
I personally prefer the 9-3 because it looks better and i don't think that the 0.3 L merits and extra AU$20-$30k.
I was wondering if anybody knows if there is more to the 9-5 than meets the eye or is it really just a much bigger car with only a slightly bigger engine.
There are much better cars out there than Holden eg. Merc or BMW, these are real cars with a respectable name, not one of GM's shitty creations.
|
|
Post #2 Thu, Jul 24, 6:52 AM |
|
NissanSkyliner
Supercar Guru - 749
 |
93 for me... the 95 is bigger...and heavier.
Proud Owner of OrangeRacing
|
|
Post #3 Sun, Mar 7, 10:13 AM |
|
bob the dealer
New Member - 29
|
I personally prefer the 93 but i own a 95 Aero estate as my company car and i can say the performance under the 95 is amazing. I cant help but smile when i put my foot down and hear that turbo kick in. I think Saabs are very under rated cars and they just keep getting better and better
Bob
|
|
Post #4 Sun, Mar 21, 5:51 AM |
|
Datsun Masterpiece
Senior Member - 362
 |
I choose the 9-3, has a better design and looks very similiar to the '94 Saab 900 (which I own and absolutely love)
~Love of Euro Cars~
My Dream cars:
1957 Maserati 450S Costin-Zagato Coupe
Aston Martin V12 Vanquish
Ford GT
Porsche 911 GT2
Lamborghini Murcielago
|
|
Posted: Today |
|
Superbot
|
|
|
Posted: Today |
|
Superbot
|
|
| All Forums > 2000 Saab 9-3 Aero Coupe > 9-3 or 9-5 > Post Reply |
|
1
|
|
