|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Post #1 Mon, Nov 15, 8:25 PM |
|
caddybadboy
Senior Member - 326
 |
It's too bad they took a perfectly good fastback off the market and put that modernized electronically controlled crap in it. What I wouldn't do to rescue that poor Stang...
Representing the 1% of kids who truly love REAL cars: the classics!
Cadillac: The Standard of the World
No replacement for Displacement!
I bet you like taking your 1.6l Honda to the store to get a 2.0l Coke, don't you?
My Ride: http://members.cardomain.com/jameslola302
|
|
Post #2 Mon, Jan 23, 2:59 PM |
|
vectorboy
New Member - 31
|
i hate computers on an engine. I could take apart an old car an put it back together in about 4 days, and it would run just as good. But in a comp car, it would never start again. All the wires would break. Even if they didn't, ild never figure out which goes where.
|
|
Post #3 Wed, Mar 1, 7:45 AM |
|
boss 429
New User - 78
|
four days? Are u talkin abour the engine?
I rebuilt my fuel injected 3.8 in two days.
theres nothing wrong with FI. YOu get more power and fuel economy. the new parts these days don't even need many computer mods.
|
|
Post #4 Fri, Jun 2, 10:23 PM |
|
weeeeeman3
New User - 18
 |
Now that's what you call real american muscle ain't nothing like a good old fastback any thing that resembles eleanor deservers to be put on the market even if it cost a lot of green
weeeeeeeeeeeeeee
|
|
Post #5 Fri, Jun 2, 10:25 PM |
|
weeeeeman3
New User - 18
|
That's what you call a cool fastback to bad I don't own one
weeeeeeeeeeeeeee
|
|
Posted: Today |
|
Superbot
|
|
|
Posted: Today |
|
Superbot
|
|
| All Forums > 2003 Ford Mustang Fastback Concept > Too bad > Post Reply |
|
1
|
|
