|
1
2
[Last >>]
|
|
|
|
|
Post #1 Tue, Feb 28, 5:21 PM |
|
Pando
Senior Member - 448
 |
I think the Ferrari FFX will eat this.
Edit: Uhhh... FXX of course, sorry.
Edited by Pando - Tue, Feb 28, 5:22 PM
|
|
Post #2 Tue, Feb 28, 7:18 PM |
|
coop a doop
Supercar Messiah - 1646
 |
I will eat your mom.
Hey, I need a few more referrals on http://ipods.freepay.com/?r=27614489 - If anyone will do one, PM me and I'll paypal you 10 bucks
|
|
Post #3 Tue, Feb 28, 7:18 PM |
|
coop a doop
Supercar Messiah - 1646
 |
Oh, by the way CCX>FXX
Hey, I need a few more referrals on http://ipods.freepay.com/?r=27614489 - If anyone will do one, PM me and I'll paypal you 10 bucks
|
|
Post #4 Tue, Feb 28, 9:13 PM |
|
NB
EVERYTHING SUC - 34237
 |
Quote from coop a doop Oh, by the way CCX>FXX
Because of road legality?
DEAR DURT MCGURT,
|
|
Post #5 Wed, Mar 1, 8:09 AM |
|
Variant
Senior Member - 334
 |
FXX: Power-To-Weight ratio: 598 bhp/ton, Power-To-Aero drag at 300 kph: ~2.19 bhp/kg, Downforce-to-weight at 300 kph: .875:1 kg. CCR: Power-To-Weight ratio: 610 bhp/ton, Power-To-Aero drag at 300 kph: ~2.86 bhp/kg, Downforce-to-weight 300 kph: .043:1 kg. The Koenigsegg has the accelleration advantage, but only notably with gaining speed, but I sususpect the high downforce and track tuned nature of the FXX would give it a pretty unquestionable advantage... given there isn't a large descrepency between the cars under braking. [shrusgs]
|
|
Post #6 Fri, Mar 3, 4:23 AM |
|
hvvlot
Member - 64
 |
well if its acceleration advantage and becuase all the other factors are similer then i think the ccx will win. The CCX has a superchager so the power will come in way sooner.
|
|
Post #7 Sat, Mar 4, 8:09 PM |
|
coop a doop
Supercar Messiah - 1646
 |
Quote from peelp502 way sooner than a n/a engine ?
Haha
Hey, I need a few more referrals on http://ipods.freepay.com/?r=27614489 - If anyone will do one, PM me and I'll paypal you 10 bucks
|
|
Post #8 Sat, Mar 4, 8:10 PM |
|
coop a doop
Supercar Messiah - 1646
 |
Quote from NB Because of road legality?
If they were the same price, I'd buy the CCX before the FXX.
Hey, I need a few more referrals on http://ipods.freepay.com/?r=27614489 - If anyone will do one, PM me and I'll paypal you 10 bucks
|
|
Post #9 Fri, Mar 31, 8:52 PM |
|
YoungJae
Supercar Guru - 578
 |
Quote from desijatt The ccx will kill fxx,fxx isn't that fast has it suppose to be, fxx was a better version of enzo and its slower then the enzo
I'd like to know how in hell it's slower than the Enzo. The weight is about the same and the FXX has better suspension and power package. Explain HOW it's slower.
As for the FXX vs. CCX, I'd say it'd be close. On a straight track, the CCX. On anything else, I'd give it to the FXX.
My ideal garage (10): 1995 McLaren F1 LM, 2005 Koenigsegg CCR, 1990 Lamborghini LM 002 Americana Estate Paris Dakar, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo Coatl, 2005 Gemballa Mirage GT, 2000 Hamann M Roadster, 2004 Hamann HM 7.0, 2005 NISMO R34 GT-R Z-tune, 2005 Maserati MC12, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 w/open exhausts
|
|
Post #10 Tue, Apr 4, 11:47 AM |
|
Euro Trash
Supercar Messiah - 7302
 |
the fxx is better, just look at the package as a whole, you get so much more
who cares, he's not a house hold name in north america like he is in the 3rd world, where people care about F1. I bet most of my friends wouldn't know who the #$%# he is - TimmyMcOwnsYou on Ayrton Senna
|
|
Post #11 Wed, Apr 19, 1:16 AM |
|
JeffreyD
New User - 0
 |
The FXX generates more downforce than the Enzo, and therefore the FXX is "slower". However, it will handle better in the corners and actually be faster on most circuits.
Compared to the CCX, I doubt it will be able to get as fast as an FXX around a circuit. Unless it's an oval
|
|
Post #12 Fri, May 5, 10:22 AM |
|
jumpman23
Senior Member - 370
 |
The FXX is better than the CCX.
|
|
Post #13 Sun, May 28, 6:58 AM |
|
nicktoad
Senior Member - 165
 |
Hard decision to make. I like this a lot better but I think the FXX is faster.
I'd say the FXX would win in a race, but the Koenigsegg beats the Ferrari in looks and style.
|
|
Post #14 Fri, Aug 25, 2:20 AM |
|
viperenzo
New User - 9
 |
fxx any day
|
|
Post #15 Tue, Sep 26, 1:19 PM |
|
FerrariF40Racer
Senior Member - 221
 |
Quote from jumpman23 The FXX is better than the CCX.
By far
"We think we could get 1000bhp out of this engine, revving to 9500 or 10,000. You'd probably then be able to do 250-255mph, but it would be hard to meet the required emission standards, in order to be able to homologate such an engine." Gordon Murray about the Mclaren F1
"The 787B was reported to have a redline around 9000rpm. However, interviews with Mazda's 787B race engineers revealed that the power of the quad-rotor increased dramatically above 9000rpm. One engineer stated that the car could develop more than 930hp with a redline around 10500rpm. They also discovered that all aspects of the engine were still in excellent condition and could have run another 24-hour race" Wikipedia
|
|
Post #16 Tue, Sep 26, 1:20 PM |
|
FerrariF40Racer
Senior Member - 221
 |
Quote from viperenzo fxx any day
Then change your avatar
"We think we could get 1000bhp out of this engine, revving to 9500 or 10,000. You'd probably then be able to do 250-255mph, but it would be hard to meet the required emission standards, in order to be able to homologate such an engine." Gordon Murray about the Mclaren F1
"The 787B was reported to have a redline around 9000rpm. However, interviews with Mazda's 787B race engineers revealed that the power of the quad-rotor increased dramatically above 9000rpm. One engineer stated that the car could develop more than 930hp with a redline around 10500rpm. They also discovered that all aspects of the engine were still in excellent condition and could have run another 24-hour race" Wikipedia
|
|
Post #17 Fri, Oct 13, 6:57 AM |
|
severetwenty 8
New User - 10
 |
I would rather have the ccx because it looks better its probably to me alot funner to drive and its faster than the fxx
|
|
Post #18 Mon, Oct 30, 3:16 PM |
|
terrorlitecrossfire
Member - 74
 |
hmmm... I kinda agree that the FXX is faster than the CCX, since its a "modified" Enzo. I think this comparison is kinda pointless. Someone needs to create a racing version for the CCX. Then we have something to discuss.
All In! ~ "RevelationEra" on bodogpoker.net
T1: The Art of Domination. 2007
|
|
Post #19 Sun, Dec 24, 8:14 PM |
|
killer filler
Senior Member - 341
 |
Quote from Euro Trash the fxx is better, just look at the package as a whole, you get so much more
HAHA your funny, the FXX is a STRIPED down-bare-bones, NON street legal car while, the CCX has performance so close to the FXX's that we cant even chose a winner on this very forum
ANNNND the CCX is street legal, actually has an interior with seats that you could sit in comfortably for a few hours, whereas the FFX has harsh racing buckets with no padding at all. further more the CCX has AC, a radio, and all the other interior comforts that a regular mini van would have.
Plus it looks WAAAAY better.
And it has cooler doors so ha!
Holy WallClimb Batman!!
|
|
Post #20 Wed, Dec 27, 12:02 AM |
|
killer filler
Senior Member - 341
 |
wow...im suprised no one has atacked me for that last post yet...im amazed
Holy WallClimb Batman!!
|
|
Post #21 Thu, Dec 28, 9:31 AM |
|
AudiSwede
Supercar Guru - 878
 |
Quote from Euro Trash the fxx is better, just look at the package as a whole, you get so much more
Yeah maybe, except the most important thing, the FXX are not allowed to be used on a road, wich sucks.
also the FXX is better?.
Maybe it has better grip, more downforce and so on, because it is a Track car.
For a road car, the CCX has killing handling and performance.
It is the fastest car on Top Gears powerlap (with the optional wing)
So if track cars can be compared to road cars, the track cars are better because they dont have to follow nearly as many restricions as the road-legal car.
If the FXX were road-legal, this could have been a great comparison.
"You buy a Ferrari when you want to be somebody. You buy a Lamborghini when you are somebody."
-Frank Sinatra
|
|
Post #22 Fri, Dec 29, 9:58 PM |
|
killer filler
Senior Member - 341
 |
wow...i JUST said that...
Holy WallClimb Batman!!
|
|
Post #23 Sat, Dec 30, 11:40 AM |
|
arclight
Supercar Messi - 2432
 |
The CCX is a hell of a lot faster but on a track the FXX just (might) have it,it is after all a track car.
|
|
Post #24 Mon, Feb 19, 7:54 AM |
|
Tundra King
New User - 59
 |
CCX > FXX.
|
|
Post #25 Thu, Mar 8, 10:19 PM |
|
stighenrikaanneland
New User - 134
 |
my moped is going 0-30mph in 20 seconds.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
Posted: Today |
|
Superbot
|
|
|
Posted: Today |
|
Superbot
|
|
| All Forums > 2006 Koenigsegg CCX > Ferrari FFX vs this > Post Reply |
|
1
2
[Newer >>]
|
|