1 2 [Last >>]
All Forums > 2006 Weineck Cobra 780 cui Limited Edition > Specs are wrong > Post Reply
Post #1 Wed, Mar 22, 4:44 AM
ch1c4n3
Supercar Messiah - 1364

Look at the power and torque figures, if the car was producing 1298lbft at 5600rpm then the power would be:
1298*5600/5252 = 1384hp
which is 284 more than the peak claim and 1400rpm lower down.

There is no way an NA engine can produce 100lbft/litre on regular fuel anyway.

The power might be right but the torque can't be any more than about 1025lbft

1973 Porsche 917/30K Can-Am, 5.4-litre F12, TT, 1100+hp/810lbft, 1860lb. Still holds the lap record at Talladega

Post #2 Wed, Mar 22, 11:14 AM
ElStiesen
Supercar Messiah - 1051

If it's the Weineck Cobra I know, it delivers 1100hp only with nitro.
Post #3 Wed, Mar 22, 1:32 PM
srsocx
Super Guy - 908

It makes between 1100 and 1200 NA. Between 1300 and 1500 with nitrous oxide injection. Now, imagine the possibilities with a block this strong and high revving. Forced induction, say 18-20 psi, and intercooled. Then, an ultralightweight aerodynamic body. What I'm basically saying is, imagine the supercar that could be built around this engine.
AMGrulz on Mc777:
Well, he is clueless on a scale never before thought possible by man. He's got his nose buried so far into F1 races and Jesus that he's lost all peripheral vision of the world around him.


Post #4 Wed, Mar 22, 1:34 PM
admin
It's Your Birt - 2842

I can't explain the figures. Maybe I will e-mail Weineck and find out.
Post #5 Wed, Mar 22, 4:43 PM
srsocx
Super Guy - 908

Quote from admin
I can't explain the figures. Maybe I will e-mail Weineck and find out.
I know for a fact it does do 1100-1200 NA, and 1300 with nitrous injection. I am not certain of the 1500 figure, I only heard that on a forum.
AMGrulz on Mc777:
Well, he is clueless on a scale never before thought possible by man. He's got his nose buried so far into F1 races and Jesus that he's lost all peripheral vision of the world around him.


Post #6 Wed, Mar 22, 7:40 PM
TheCarGods
Supercar Guru - 508

There is no way it generates 1300 lbs/ft of torque from a N/A 12.6L engine. Thats more that 100lbs per liter, which is only possible from forced induction engines. Even the engine from the Enzo (and I hope people don't think that Weineck can build a better engine than Ferrari) only makes 485 lbs/ft from 6 liters. That works out to about 81 lbs per liter. Maybe I'm wrong, but if I am, someone tell me what other car in the world makes 100 lbs per liter. I bet you can't.
|- Proud Hater of the McLaren-Mercedes F1 Team -|- Hamilton is a Tool -|- ///M Power -|- Forza Ferrari -|- BMW Sauber -|- Quattro Rules All -|- There's something creepy about a Finn at McLaren. One only needs to look at the twinkle in Ron's eye as Heikki walks past to know that all is not as it seems... -|

Post #7 Wed, Mar 22, 8:26 PM
Atomic
Supercar Messiah - 2393

im pretty sure its supercharged, i remember reading that somewhere

edit: it doesnt look that way in the photos though, but im really damn sure i read it was supercharged somewhere back when it just came out

bleh im probly thinking of an other cobra


Edited by Atomic - Wed, Mar 22, 8:32 PM
Post #8 Wed, Mar 22, 9:25 PM
thehugepons
New User - 1

in response to TheCarGods comment about a there not being a naturally aspiratred engine is mass production that doesn't make 100hp/liter...ever hear of a little two seater car called the Honda S2000. According to the Honda the engine makes 237 horsepower at 7800 RPM and 162 lb.-ft of torque. All of this out of a 2.2 liter 4 cylinder. Let's do the math, 237 hp divided by 2.2 liters is 107.7 hp/liter, unless i'm mistaken.
Post #9 Wed, Mar 22, 11:48 PM
ElStiesen
Supercar Messiah - 1051

100lbs per liter, TheCarGod was talking about torque.
Post #10 Wed, Mar 22, 11:57 PM
ElStiesen
Supercar Messiah - 1051

The one I meant is an older version, I think "only" eight litres or so. It had a nitro. Those times they were talking about the possibility of creating a 13 litre version...
Considering that 1/2 litre per cylinder is supposed to be optimal, I wonder how they manage to distribute the gas effectively to the chamber. I guess it is still far from perfect and that engine could develop much more power if they keep on working on it.

Btw, notice the 4-gear manual, I think it is a Nascar gearbox, anything else would be ripped apart by the monstrous torque.


Edited by ElStiesen - Wed, Mar 22, 11:59 PM
Post #11 Wed, Mar 22, 11:59 PM
raca4life
Supercar Guru - 519

I think the HP and torque figures may have been switched. 1100 lb-ft at 5600rpm sounds about right for 1300 hp @ 7000rpm. That mean it makes 975 lb-ft at 7000rpm.

975 * 7000 / 5252 = 1299.5

"On a given day, a given circumstance, you think you have a limit. And you then go for this limit and you touch this limit, and you think, 'Okay, this is the limit'. And so you touch this limit, something happens and you suddenly can go a little bit further. With your mind power, your determination, your instinct, and the experience as well, you can fly very high."
- Ayrton Senna

Post #12 Thu, Mar 23, 2:06 AM
Euro Trash
Supercar Messiah - 7302

its still not very impressive
who cares, he's not a house hold name in north america like he is in the 3rd world, where people care about F1. I bet most of my friends wouldn't know who the #$%# he is - TimmyMcOwnsYou on Ayrton Senna

Post #13 Thu, Mar 23, 2:50 AM
ging
Supercar Messiah - 6494

Quote from ch1c4n3
Look at the power and torque figures, if the car was producing 1298lbft at 5600rpm then the power would be:
1298*5600/5252 = 1384hp
which is 284 more than the peak claim and 1400rpm lower down.

There is no way an NA engine can produce 100lbft/litre on regular fuel anyway.

The power might be right but the torque can't be any more than about 1025lbft
i was thiking that too, maybe it produced 1300hp at 7000rpm and 1100lbft at 5600rpm - that would be feasible
Post #14 Thu, Mar 23, 12:53 PM
ElStiesen
Supercar Messiah - 1051

If you can't win... learn to loose! ;-)
Post #15 Thu, Mar 23, 3:00 PM
srsocx
Super Guy - 908

This engine has a HUGE capacity for improvement. Because it is huge. A V8 this goddamn big does nothing for me. I want my 854 cui V16.

Think, 200hp per liter is feasible...

200*13=2600...

AMGrulz on Mc777:
Well, he is clueless on a scale never before thought possible by man. He's got his nose buried so far into F1 races and Jesus that he's lost all peripheral vision of the world around him.


Post #16 Thu, Mar 23, 10:51 PM
Bugatti4evr
ringleader - 23131

Quote from thehugepons
in response to TheCarGods comment about a there not being a naturally aspiratred engine is mass production that doesn't make 100hp/liter...ever hear of a little two seater car called the Honda S2000. According to the Honda the engine makes 237 horsepower at 7800 RPM and 162 lb.-ft of torque. All of this out of a 2.2 liter 4 cylinder. Let's do the math, 237 hp divided by 2.2 liters is 107.7 hp/liter, unless i'm mistaken.
the S2000 revs really really high.
and he was referring to torque.

100lbs/litre is a myth.

Post #17 Fri, Mar 24, 4:32 AM
srsocx
Super Guy - 908

Wrong, Saleen S7, 7 liters, 700ft.lbs of torque.
AMGrulz on Mc777:
Well, he is clueless on a scale never before thought possible by man. He's got his nose buried so far into F1 races and Jesus that he's lost all peripheral vision of the world around him.


Post #18 Fri, Mar 24, 9:34 AM
Euro Trash
Supercar Messiah - 7302

Quote from rigidreaves
sure thing dumbass
1100bhp out of 12782 cc, you could get that from a fridge freezer
who cares, he's not a house hold name in north america like he is in the 3rd world, where people care about F1. I bet most of my friends wouldn't know who the #$%# he is - TimmyMcOwnsYou on Ayrton Senna

Post #19 Fri, Mar 24, 1:07 PM
Sniperhail
Senior Member - 226

Quote from Euro Trash
1100bhp out of 12782 cc, you could get that from a fridge freezer
That works out to around 86 horsepower per liter. Seeing as horsepower is a function of torque and engine RPM that is pretty damn impressive. Obviously it has torque in spades, and why not, it's friggin' huge. Being able to rev as high as it does though, that's something to wonder at. Each piston in this thing is gi-normous, and it has to come to a complete stop and reverse position every cycle. This is why your high hp/L naturally aspirated engines tend to be smaller, since it's less rotational mass to stop and start. Obviously if money isnt an object, you can build high displacement Carrera GT and Enzo engines, but these are the exceptions to the rule. So is it in the 100 hp/L club? No. But it's still a damn fine piece of machinery.

Edited by Sniperhail - Fri, Mar 24, 1:08 PM
Post #20 Fri, Mar 24, 4:56 PM
epsylum
Member - 66

No matter what that thing would be a wheel spin machine. I bet 100mph roll-on burnouts are common place.
Yes, that is a 911 towing a boat. ;)

Post #21 Sat, Mar 25, 1:37 PM
Euro Trash
Supercar Messiah - 7302

Quote from Sniperhail
That works out to around 86 horsepower per liter. Seeing as horsepower is a function of torque and engine RPM that is pretty damn impressive. Obviously it has torque in spades, and why not, it's friggin' huge. Being able to rev as high as it does though, that's something to wonder at. Each piston in this thing is gi-normous, and it has to come to a complete stop and reverse position every cycle. This is why your high hp/L naturally aspirated engines tend to be smaller, since it's less rotational mass to stop and start. Obviously if money isnt an object, you can build high displacement Carrera GT and Enzo engines, but these are the exceptions to the rule. So is it in the 100 hp/L club? No. But it's still a damn fine piece of machinery.
its not a fine piece of machinery, but it is good.
who cares, he's not a house hold name in north america like he is in the 3rd world, where people care about F1. I bet most of my friends wouldn't know who the #$%# he is - TimmyMcOwnsYou on Ayrton Senna

Post #22 Sat, Mar 25, 7:11 PM
Tuning06
New User - 39

Wow and to think that a 12.8 liter V8 could reach 8,000 Rpm!! Anyways, in theory yes the engine should be making more power, however we forget that this formula only works in 'perfect testing conditions'. In real life the engine suffers from friction, has to power other things like the battery, and loses horsepower do to heat and atmosferic pressure and other factors
Ayrton Senna lives forever

Post #23 Mon, Mar 27, 4:19 PM
Nick Bain
Member - 92

Quote from TheCarGods
There is no way it generates 1300 lbs/ft of torque from a N/A 12.6L engine. Thats more that 100lbs per liter, which is only possible from forced induction engines. Even the engine from the Enzo (and I hope people don't think that Weineck can build a better engine than Ferrari) only makes 485 lbs/ft from 6 liters. That works out to about 81 lbs per liter. Maybe I'm wrong, but if I am, someone tell me what other car in the world makes 100 lbs per liter. I bet you can't.
I bet you that such a massive bore and stroke and relatively high compresion pretty much defies the 100lbs rule
who? Mike jones.
Noob?/fanboy f that

I'm just arguing with people cause it make my post # go up faster so I can finally make my own topic

Post #24 Tue, Mar 28, 1:14 AM
Ozzzman
Senior Member - 374

That's some engine! I only wonder how reliable it is. But alas, this wasn't meant to be an everyday car. If it'd rain, you'd get wet and worse, how can you ever get all that power down in the wet without ending up backwards?
Not many standard 1100cc road cars match the performance of my car:

Citroen AX 1.1i

0-62 in 11.9 sec

Max 105 mph

Post #25 Tue, Mar 28, 12:49 PM
ayrten
New User - 1

Specs gotta be wrong. It'll probably be the other way
round. 1298hp and 1100ft/lbs. Makes more sense. Then you
have about 101hp/l which is feasable with an engine like
this running at 7000rpm and about 86 ft/lbs per liter,
which is also not so bad considdering it's a high revving
machine. Having said that, I wonder if these rpm's are right.
A F430, for instance, has a pretty highstrung engine and makes
about 8000-8200 rpm with a 4.3 l V8. This engine is 3 times
bigger and still can make 7000-8000 rpm? I wonder.



Posted: Today
Superbot


Posted: Today
Superbot


All Forums > 2006 Weineck Cobra 780 cui Limited Edition > Specs are wrong > Post Reply
1 2 [Newer >>]