|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Post #1 Wed, Feb 28, 8:04 PM |
|
Panzer
bacchanal - 35056
 |
This is so hot, I want to have one sit next to a 340R in my garage.
"Classy brew, classy brew" - Jim, also known as Iggy
|
|
Post #2 Wed, Feb 28, 9:30 PM |
|
TheRedWasp
Member - 71
 |
There's no way this thing takes 3.8 seconds to get to 60. 252 bhp and 1477 lbs... the 243 bhp Exige (weighing like 2000 lbs) does it in 3.9 seconds. I'd guess more like 3.2 to 3.5 seconds to 60.
If you think the subject car is a bad car, then either -A- You Own A Better Car or -B- There's Something Wrong With You. Those are the only two possibilities.
|
|
Post #3 Wed, Feb 28, 9:32 PM |
|
Atomic2
BANNED - 17944
 |
Quote from TheRedWasp
There's no way this thing takes 3.8 seconds to get to 60. 252 bhp and 1477 lbs... the 243 bhp Exige (weighing like 2000 lbs) does it in 3.9 seconds. I'd guess more like 3.2 to 3.5 seconds to 60.
lighter cars have trouble putting power down to the road
Member of CHUPA
|
|
Post #4 Thu, Mar 1, 6:15 PM |
|
RHCPeppers
New User - 65
 |
i have trouble beliveing how fast on the get go this thing is....inline 4?...252bhp? not happenin
nee to the oh
"neo"
|
|
Post #5 Thu, Mar 1, 8:29 PM |
|
Youreallfullofit
Supercar Messiah - 8759
 |
Quote from RHCPeppers
i have trouble beliveing how fast on the get go this thing is....inline 4?...252bhp? not happenin
This car is hawt HAWT HAAAWT. I want it.
"I just doubt many here will be able to last 10 sec with me" - Raging Balls
|
|
Post #6 Sun, Mar 4, 10:24 AM |
|
Tommy kaira
Senior Member - 120
|
Quote from RHCPeppers
i have trouble beliveing how fast on the get go this thing is....inline 4?...252bhp? not happenin
|
|
Post #7 Sun, Mar 4, 5:12 PM |
|
ib357
New User - 22
 |
this is sick man, its a roofless exige with a little more power and less weight
mopar had their goods, mopar had their bads.
GM had their good, GM had their bad
Ford had there goods, Ford had their bads
some had more goods than bads, some had more bads than good, but in the end theyre all american muscle to me.
|
|
Post #8 Mon, Mar 5, 1:35 PM |
|
NeoGoatboy
Supercar Messi - 2228
 |
Quote from RHCPeppers
i have trouble beliveing how fast on the get go this thing is....inline 4?...252bhp? not happenin
The 340R tips the scale at some 600 kilos. On a track it wouldnÂt make much difference if you were in a Porsche 911 Turbo or the latest Ferrari. Their ass is grass, and the 340R is a lawn mover
The Austin Metro was a horrible car, improving little in its looks through 20-odd years until its production, by then as the Rover 100, ceased in 1997. There was however a time when, bored with the daily grind, the devil himself visited the Austin works and went all Blue Peter on the little hatchback. He decided to eliminate the weight by making it all out of cereal packets and sticky backed plastic. Then he took out the weedy engine and dropped in a 410bhp V6 where the back seats should be. A bit of widening here and some aerodynamic accoutrements there and the 6R4 was born. A flared, snarling demon that the man downstairs is proud to call his own.
|
|
Post #9 Mon, Mar 5, 5:59 PM |
|
RedPower
Senior Member - 459
 |
For a company that is always out of money, Lotus sure knows how to come up with an ever-less-practical Elise variant every ten minutes. Lotus is the new TVR, making their cars lighter, faster, and crazier, without a care in the world for profit margins. Tally ho, lads.
It's going to be a long season.
|
|
Post #10 Mon, Mar 5, 9:44 PM |
|
CCfan14
New User - 29
 |
Quote from RHCPeppers
i have trouble beliveing how fast on the get go this thing is....inline 4?...252bhp? not happenin
1. Koenigsegg CCR
2. McLaren F1 LM
3. Dauer 962
4. Mercedes Benz CLK GTR SS
5. Noble M400
|
|
Posted: Today |
|
Superbot
|
|
|
Posted: Today |
|
Superbot
|
|
| All Forums > 2007 Lotus Sport 2-Eleven > Holy Shit > Post Reply |
|
1
|
|
