Re: S2000 is better i agree this concept is definitley not attractive. mugen debuted their somewhat less modified 2k at the tokyo auto salon this year and looks much better.<!-- Signature -->
Re: S2000 is better even the sssss2222200000000 wudnt be as good as any corvette or for that matter any stock suv lol this pieces of shiyt can rot in here<!-- Signature -->
Re: S2000 is better LISTEN YOU MOTHER FUCKER!!!!! I DONT GIVE A **** ABOUT YOUR FUCKIN CORVETTE!!!!! WHY IS IT THAT YOU AMERICANS RECENT HONDAS??? HUH??? WHAT ABOUT RELIABILITY?? THOSE CORVETTES ARE SHIT CARS! I READ ON A MOTOR TREND ABOUT A Z06, WHEN IT HAD 4,000miles THEY HAD TO CHANGE THE PISTON RINGS!!!! AN S2000 WOULD LAST ABOUT 200,000miles... WHAT IF THE S2000 WOULD BE 5.7L????? AND WHAT IF THE CORVETTE WOULD BE 2.0L???? COME ON AND DON'T MAKE STUPID COMPARISONS... Then look at the ferrari F50.. 1000C.C. smaller than a corvette and normally aspirated.. and it kicks its ass!!!! that is another idiotic comparison but since you compare them that way... LET'S HAVE IT YOUR WAY!<!-- Signature -->
Re: S2000 is better <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from hondalover</i> <b>LISTEN YOU MOTHER FUCKER!!!!! I DONT GIVE A **** ABOUT YOUR FUCKIN CORVETTE!!!!! WHY IS IT THAT YOU AMERICANS RECENT HONDAS??? HUH??? WHAT ABOUT RELIABILITY?? THOSE CORVETTES ARE SHIT CARS! I READ ON A MOTOR TREND ABOUT A Z06, WHEN IT HAD 4,000miles THEY HAD TO CHANGE THE PISTON RINGS!!!! AN S2000 WOULD LAST ABOUT 200,000miles... WHAT IF THE S2000 WOULD BE 5.7L????? AND WHAT IF THE CORVETTE WOULD BE 2.0L???? COME ON AND DON'T MAKE STUPID COMPARISONS... Then look at the ferrari F50.. 1000C.C. smaller than a corvette and normally aspirated.. and it kicks its ass!!!! that is another idiotic comparison but since you compare them that way... LET'S HAVE IT YOUR WAY!</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->calm down man!<!-- Signature -->
Re: S2000 is better sorry man, I really got pissed off... I really dont understand this why is this bad thing towards HONDA...<!-- Signature -->
Re: S2000 is better <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from hondalover</i> <b>sorry man, I really got pissed off... I really dont understand this why is this bad thing towards HONDA...</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->Hey, just leave that kid alone, why care about some stupid kids? they are just fooling around.<!-- Signature -->
Re: S2000 is better <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from eyst</i> <b>I don't like Mugen.. Well, actually, not that i don't like Mugen, but i feel it's focused on things that don't interest me. Mugen is just Honda really... even it's founder was the son of Honda's leader. Mugen parts are really about streetability, prestige and looks (even though it's pretty crap at times). Take for example the Mugen twin-loop silencer exhaust system.. compare this against say the Spoon N1 axle-back exhaust. The mugen is quieter, but heavy as hell since it loops the airflow through the muffler again.. this restricts air flow considerably, is considerably a heavier exhaust, looks nice and shiny and has a nice quiet sound to it. Spoon on the other hand.. loud as hell, looks like a can, light as anything. Mugen = Show car Spoon = Racing <IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif"></b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->yep, that's true.<!-- Signature -->
Re: S2000 is better Hey Wakkawu, or what ever your name is, Why did you say that the s2000 was worse than any corvette? The s2000 is not even suppose to compete with corvettes. Your a dumbass. I am a Chevy fan but I respect all cars. I have nothing against the s2000 or the Chevrolet Corvette. Please wipe your ass before making such crazy statements. By the way, how much crack are you smoking? And why did you say that the s2000 couldnt beat any SUV? Was that a joke, or were you high when you were typing? Any true car lover has respect for all cars. (exept the pinto)Please dont be so stupid next time, and I hope you learned something from this post!<!-- Signature -->
Re: Thats cause this is a concept.<A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/cool.gif"></A>
Re: S2000 is better So lets get this straight, Corvette = fast, faster than this, but not as realiable, and in general Honda = reliability, and i suppose somewhat fast cars. I think that honda needs to stick to the reliability, that works for them just fine, but as far as suping up a I-4 im gonna have to say no. If you want a fast car you get one with a real engine, of course there will be maintence, but its the price you pay for having something with more cylinders, and that can kill stock I-4's. (With the exception of the crazy ass racing ones that were built) And Honda Civics need to stay grocery getters, those cars are nowhere near built for performance. You can get any mod you want i dont care, its still not a race car. You want a race car? you buy something nice, like a 2000 Camaro SS. Damn its a nice car, handles like a dream, and the traction controll rules. THAT car can put the power to the groud. CIVICS put the power to the friggen front wheels, and their axels just snap, BECAUES they're NOT built for it!!! When will everybody learn. Oh, and YES the axels snapped on a civic i read about, trying to launch at a drag race. It had about 600HP. The cars are NOT meant for racing, because if it cant handle that much HP then its a peice of shit!!!!!
Re: S2000 is better I agree.. The S2000 is much better looking than this thing and I dont think this is much faster.
Even the Corvette wouldn't be anywhere near as good as a Honda NSX....by the time the Corvette starts to catch up in the straight, it will be pretty close to blowing its engine.