1970 Chaparral 2J – Astonishing

Begun as a project at Chevrolet and inherited by Jim Hall, a sports-racing car with phenomenal potential became the Chaparral 2J. Although framed and intended to encourage innovation, the Can-Am series had seen nothing like it.

At Watkins Glen they said, โ€œIt looks like the box it came in.โ€ Even that harsh judgement of the appearance of the new Chaparral 2J may have been too generous. However, handsome is as handsome does and in its astonishing way the 2J did handsomely.

A World Champion was sufficiently impressed with its concept to drive the Chaparral 2J at Watkins Glen in 1970 and set a fastest lap while running in very fast company. Although the 2J did not last long enough to get close to winning, it showed great potential and restored its developer, Jim Hall, to his well-earned status of the Wizard Technician of Group 7 racing. In the rest of the 1970 Can-Am season it revealed phenomenal pace.

In mid-1970 Jim Hall looked at the birdie from the cockpit of his latest creation, the Chaparral 2J. The result of a combined effort between Chaparral cars and Chevrolet R&D, the 2J was the innovative elixir that Hall needed after his troubled Can-Am seasons of 1968 and โ€˜69. Looking, as one commentator said, โ€œlike the box it came in,โ€ the 2J introduced suction ground effects to automobile racing.

But was it the Chaparral Show…or was it really the Chevy Show with Jim Hall as master of ceremonies? In fact, the new 2J Chaparral was conceived and constructed, in its major essentials, at the Chevrolet Engineering Center in Warren, Michigan. This was not a new relationship. Since 1964, Chaparral and Chevroletโ€™s secretive R&D Department had been closely cooperating on the building, testing and even racing of advanced sports-racing cars.

Shown, as at left, at Midlandโ€™s Rattlesnake Raceway prior to its racing debut, the 2J was sucked against the road surface by two extractor fans mounted at its extreme rear. Hallโ€™s 2J was a much-improved (by Chaparral) evolution of a crude test vehicle built by Chevrolet R&D to explore this radical concept.

The 2Jโ€™s basic concept was simple enough. If a vacuum could be maintained underneath a moving automobile, it would hold the car down with greater force. With the latest racing tires, more force would mean more grip, translating into vastly increased cornering power. The idea was not new. Dresden, Germanyโ€™s Vasa Niฤ‡in applied for a patent on it on December 29, 1925.

A diagram explained the concept of the Chaparral 2J. Driven at a constant speed of some 5,000 rpm by a separate engine, the twin 17-inch fans at the rear extracted air from an enclosed area of the 2J extending from the rear of the front wheels all the way to the extreme tail. At the side and rear, skirts made of tough GE Lexan plastic ensured that the suction was highly effective by staying close to the road surface.

The wider and larger the tires, the bigger the contact patch on the pavement and the more work they will do before sliding as the downforce is increased. Faster cornering is the key to success on road-racing tracks. This would later be exploited in so-called โ€œground effectโ€ racing cars but these were a decade in the future, while the basis of the 2J was created in the winter of 1968.

The front end of the 2J Chaparral was shaped to divert as much air as possible up over the top of the vehicle and around its sides. Front air inlets were for the engine-cooling radiator and ducts to the front brakes. Slotted inlets on both sides of the rollover bar ingested induction air for the engine.

This concept was available long before the FIA implemented a height reduction on aerodynamic wings that sent all Can-Am and other competitors scrambling for some new โ€œunfair advantage.โ€ During 1968, engineers in Chevroletโ€™s Research and Development Department seized on suction downforce as a radical breakthrough that could revitalize their activities under new chief Charlie Simmons.

With Jim Hall building his Chaparral 2H on his own for the 1969 season, they needed something new that might help the Texan in the future. After tests with mockups and mule vehicles showed promise, R&D engineer Paul Van Valkenburgh said, โ€œSimmons gave Don Gates all the draftsmen, technicians and budget he needed to have it ready for the next racing season.โ€

Gates, the brainy engineer who had won Simmonsโ€™ approval, concentrated on the suction system of Chevyโ€™s โ€œSuspension Test Vehicleโ€ or STV. Don Cox, Joe Marasco and Ernie DeFusco designed the car that would carry it. The challenge they faced in creating a suitable body forced them to ignore conventional aerodynamic ideas. Their dominant need was for a robust box that would not collapse under the vacuum generated inside it.

The central section of the Chaparral 2J was a deep and rugged aluminum monocoque tub. It used front suspension similar to that of the 2H and rear suspension adapted from the 2G. That the suspension geometries provided anti-dive and anti-squat was particularly useful for the 2J, which needed to ride as flat and level as possible to maintain its ground-effect skirts in close proximity to the road.

The STVโ€™s fundamental monocoque structure was very deep through its center because that portion, initially unpainted, was a major load-bearing section. Hatches in its sides met the rules requiring doors. Longerons extending rearward from the monocoque embraced the Chaparral-prepared Chevrolet V-8, an aluminum engine of 7.6 liters and 680 bhp driving through a Chevy-built transmission combining a torque converter with three gears forward that were shifted without a clutch.

The Chaparral 2H carried over Chevrolet’s torque-converter transmission with a three-gear dog-clutch box. Perched atop this was the engine that drove the extractor fans, a two-cylinder two-stroke air-cooled JLO engine usually found in snowmobiles. Disc brakes were internally ventilated.

Containing the areas where suction was generated was a box-like structure made of 0.25-inch aluminum honeycomb. With no available technology to give it curvature, the result was a laughably slab-sided appearance. Dzus fasteners joined the major panels together and allowed quick access. In all, said Van Valkenburgh, โ€œit was probably the strongest, stiffest racecar chassis that had ever been built.โ€

Stripped of its front and rear body sections, the 2J revealed its deep central aluminum monocoque structure. Its hinged โ€œdoorsโ€ met the letter of the Can-Am regulations. Standing behind the car in sunglasses was Cameron Argetsinger, spark plug of road racing at Watkins Glen who had joined Chaparral Cars as a vice president in 1970.

The STVโ€™s suspension was conventional. At the front it had tubular wishbones and coil/damper assemblies like those of the Chaparral 2H and racing-style linkages like those of the 2E/G at the rear. Their geometries countered nose-dive on braking and tail squat on acceleration, both of these being activities that would upset the skirt system more than would be convenient.

Ducts from the air inlets athwart the cockpit provided fresh ram air to the inlet manifold of the 2J, carried over from the 2H. In the foreground, attached to the rear suspension by a Bowden cable, is the bell-crank linkage that kept the Lexan side skirt close to the ground as the rear of the Chaparral rose and fell over bumps.

An important feature of the STVโ€™s springing was that it was trimmed for ideal geometry at 1.5 inches below the carโ€™s stance with its downforce not running. That was the amount that the car was calculated to be pulled down by suction to its operating height. From that datum line, the springing allowed three inches of travel in both jounce and rebound. To take advantage of its downforce the STV wore the widest wheel rims it could accept and the widest of Firestoneโ€™s racing tires. Disc brakes were internally vented for cooling.

Jim Hallโ€™s problematic Chaparral 2H.

As the 1969 Can-Am season progressed, the faults of Hallโ€™s Chaparral 2H were found to be many and insoluble. This was not surprising to Chevrolet, which knew that Hallโ€™s personally chosen approach, a car built for maximum speed with little attention to downforce, would not work on the Can-Am circuits.

Meanwhile, tests of the STV were attracting attention at Chevrolet R&D. โ€œThe first time the auxiliary-motor fan-drive system was fired up,โ€ recalled Van Valkenburgh, โ€œit literally smoked out the engineering lab. It became rather embarrassing to have aroundโ€ฆso ridiculously sensational that everyone was talking about it.โ€ In the spring of 1969, Hall asked Don Gates to join his effort to sort out the 2H. Chevrolet decided that as the STV was Gatesโ€™s baby, the semi-finished vehicle might as well accompany him to Midland. It was shipped there in September.

As originally built by Chevrolet and made whole to run at Rattlesnake, the STVโ€™s rear wheels were exposed, in conventional fashion. Suction was applied over an area that was the width of the car and the length of the body between its wheel arches. Suction fans were mounted low at the sides of the body, flanking the engine and individually driven by small two-stroke motors.

In tests, beginning in November of 1969, this arrangement did give substantial downforce but the carโ€™s handling was treacherous. โ€œRegardless of how much basic understeer was incorporated with the fans off,โ€ said Paul Van Valkenburgh, โ€œwhen they were turned on the car oversteered uncontrollably. Apparently, the center of downward pressure was too far forward. But in spite of all the problems, with the fans working it was as fast as any other car ever run at Midland.โ€

Among the gauges facing the driver in the cockpit of the 2J was one which told him how much suction was being generated under the car. Tests showed that when suction was lost the Chaparral remained easily controllable. He was also informed about the cylinder-head temperature of the auxiliary engine. As in the 2G the steering wheel was quick-removable for easy entry.

While Jim Hall was increasingly cool to โ€œsomeone elseโ€™s Can-Am carโ€ the STV found a defender at Midland in Tom Dutton, an engineer-driver who had joined the team during 1969. โ€œPractically everyone else viewed the project with either distrust or malice,โ€ recalled Van Valkenburgh. Dutton was the driver for tests that proved to the sanctioning Sports Car Club of America that the car would not be wildly uncontrollable if or when downforce was lost. The SCCA also judged it acceptable in spite of FIA rules prohibiting โ€œmovable aerodynamic devicesโ€.

To address the handling problem Gates reconceived the rear of the STV. Mocking it up with plywood, the rear of the body was rebuilt to enclose the wheels, nearly doubling the area of suction downforce. In tests of this version at Rattlesnake, said Paul Van Valkenburgh, โ€œDutton was able to circle the skid pad at a fantastic lateral 1.7 G! This was a major jump from the previous best of 1.3 G. Dutton went out on the road course and knocked nearly two seconds off Hallโ€™s previous best time.โ€

This won respect at Midland, where the STV was given such a skeptical reception. Now accepted as a potential Chaparral, it was given the 2J designation, 2I being skipped. It needed substantial rebuilding and testing before it could become a racing car, time-consuming effort that lost its priority to Hallโ€™s agreement to take over Chevroletโ€™s Trans-Am Camaro program. Its demands meant that the 2J missed the first two Can-Am races but was readyโ€”justโ€”for the third one at Watkins Glen on July 12th.

As much for its potential as for its performance, the Chaparral 2J caused great consternation in the Can-Am ranks. Rivals had recourse to the rule books, which stated that moving parts with an aerodynamic function were banned. In 1970 this regulation had caused the elimination of high movable wings like those Chaparral had pioneered. It was concluded that both the rotating fans and the movable skirt contravened this regulation. At the end of the season both would be banned.

Preparation included extending the aluminum honeycomb box to shroud the rear wheels entirely and complete enclosure of the rear of the car. Suction fans were now mounted at the extreme rear and driven by a single central auxiliary engine. โ€œAn alternate plan to use a variable-ratio snowmobile belt drive off the transmission was set aside as too complex,โ€ Van Valkenburgh related, โ€œbut as it turned out that might have proved more dependable.โ€ As well the new arrangement placed some 200 pounds of fans and engine high in the air, cantilevered out over the tailโ€”not ideal for the center of gravity.

Suction was generated by radiator-cooling fans from an M-109 self-propelled howitzer. They had 17-inch blades, aluminum castings made by the Pesco Products Division of Borg-Warner, whose catalogue said that each fan could pump 9,650 cubic feet of air per minute when spun at 6,000 rpm, while maintaining a static pressure of 11 inches of water or 0.027 bar.

The โ€œsnowmobileโ€ part of the 2J, two Howitzer cooling fans being driven by a JLO two-stroke, 2-cylinder engine, whose separate exhaust pipe can be seen just above the centrally placed Chaparral sticker.

Driving two of these fans, through cogged rubber belts and magnesium sprockets, was the best engine Chaparral could find for the job: a German-made JLO two-stroke, air-cooled twin imported by Rockwell, giving a rated 45 bhp at 5,500 rpm. This engine was judged reliable after engine man Gary Knutson fitted a capacitor-discharge ignition system to overcome problems caused by dirt getting into the points of its conventional coil ignition. Problems with blade erosion from roadway debris were tackled by fitting each fan blade with a steel leading-edge guard.

Chaparral engine man Gary Knutson equipped the air-cooled JLO engine with fuel injection and capacitive-discharge ignition to enhance its reliability. Nevertheless it showed a strong tendency to run well at Midland but to give trouble when the 2H visited the Can-Am tracks. With the engine running at full throttle all the time, the 2J driver had to monitor its cylinder-head temperature and adjust its mixture accordingly. He was often too busy to carry out this task.

The fans were evidently operating at slight under-drive, relative to engine speed (about 5,000 rpm) because their gross horsepower requirement at 6,000 rpm was 52 bhpโ€”more than the JLO could deliver. That was still enough to maintain a vacuum of 0.020 bar under the skirts when the car was at rest or moving slowly. The advantage of having an auxiliary engine was, of course, that downforce was present at all times, especially at low speeds where the extra downforce is most effectiveโ€”and where wings donโ€™t work at all.

Crucial to the creation and maintenance of downforce was a system of skirts that surrounded the suction area and remained as close to the ground as possible. The closer they conformed to the road the more effective the suction from the fans would be. But in being close to the road they inevitably made contact at times. To permit this without having the skirts bent or broken, they were made of General Electricโ€™s tough Lexan plastic.

Side skirts were simple 2.3-mm sheets suspended from lever arms that adjusted their height in response to suspension movement through push-pull Bowden cables. The side skirts went up and down with the wheels and the rear skirt followed them, linked as it was to the side skirts at its ends.

The front skirt presented the greatest problem. Running across the car just behind its front wheels, it was crucial to the systemโ€™s success. While the fans worked hard to pull air out of the suction chamber, the carโ€™s forward motion tried to ram air into that chamber. To minimize the extent of the pressure with which this forward skirt had to cope, the 2Jโ€™s body was shaped to scoop as much air up and over its top as possible. Transverse rubber strips under the carโ€™s nose further interrupted the air flow.

Providing the vital seal at the front of the suction area under the Chaparral 2J was a transverse row of a dozen Lexan plaques. Each of the plaques comprised an individual system, with a plastic hinge to the body. As designed by Chevroletโ€™s Don Gates, each was backed up by two more Lexan plaques which were hinged to it in such a way as to harness both spring and vacuum force to keep its trailing edge firmly against the pavement.

The front skirt had to rub hard against the ground while the 2J was moving. It did this, at acceptable wear rates, because it was composed of a row of 12, thick Lexan plaques. These trailed sharply back from the underbody. Each had its own plastic hinge, backed by two others similarly hinged in a way that used combined spring and vacuum pressure to keep its trailing edge down against the pavement.

The front skirtโ€™s segmented construction allowed it to adjust to road contours. The individual plaques had enough length to accept some wear. A new set was fitted for each race or as required, depending on the measured wear rate. They successfully survived 200 miles of testing at Hallโ€™s Rattlesnake Raceway, showing that they could cope with a race duration.

Based on the suction systemโ€™s parameters an estimate would be that it could hold a 0.020 bar vacuum through the speed range up to 80 mph at which it was designed to perform best. Applied over the approximately 7,400 square inches of skirted chamber, this generated 2,220 pounds of downforce. That was more than the gross weight of the car with its 320 liters of fuel (57 of them in a separate tank, mixed with oil, for the JLO engine) and a driver in the cockpit. So Jim Hall could have unveiled his 2J with it hanging upside down from the ceiling, the JLO shrieking away.

Next to a Porsche 917, considered one of the most advanced conventional racers of 1970, the Chaparral 2J was a startling sight. Measurements conducted by Chaparral showed it to be capable of cornering at least seven percent faster than the dominant Can-Am McLarens.

With its original abbreviated vacuum chamber the 2J had enough downforce to corner at a lateral 1.8 G. Best figures for winged Can-Am cars were in the range of 1.5 G. Hall said that with the extended chamber up to 2.0 cornering G should be attainable. A major difficulty was simply finding a driver who could exploit the extra half-G. Jim did not feel that he was up to it, โ€œIโ€™m driving like I always did but I just donโ€™t seem to be going fast.

โ€œWhen we introduced the 2J we thought who weโ€™d like to do it,โ€ Hall continued, โ€œand we thought of Jackie Stewart.โ€ It helped that both Hall and Stewart were represented by the same talent-management company at the time. โ€œHe agreed to drive it on a one-shot basis at a very reasonable price because he wanted to look at the car and see what it was.โ€

Jim Hall obtained the services of reigning World Champion driver Jackie Stewart as his 2J pilot for the Watkins Glen Can-Am race.

 

Special test days arranged at Watkins Glen were wasted because Stewart discovered all too early that stones sucked up from the recently resurfaced track lodged in the fan sprockets and flipped off the drive belts. A protective guard was made to shield the belts while other problems were diagnosed: overheating of the huge rear brakes and persistent vapor-locking of the JLOโ€™s Tillotson carburetors. Bathed in engine heat from below and trapped under Lexan above, the JLO was complainingโ€”although like the skirt it had kept going through the 200-mile test at Midland.

The early tests helped Stewart meet one of the challenges of the 2J: its left-foot braking, an important advantage of the carโ€™s semi-automatic transmission. โ€œThis called for a new sensitivity in getting things coordinated,โ€ said the Scot, โ€œalmost re-learning how to drive.โ€

Asked about his new carโ€™s attributes, Jim Hall answered, โ€œWith my former car, the 2G, we could get wheelspin and make it violently oversteer by over-controlling the throttle at almost any speed and at almost any place on the race course. But not the 2J. We can go full throttle without wheelspin or uncontrollable oversteer, at a much lower speed, and accelerate out of the corners at a much higher speed than ever before.โ€

The Chaparral crew gave Jackie Stewart a push out of the pits in the 2J at Watkins Glen. After several troubled years Chaparral was again in the limelight, and with good reason. Although powered ground effects were banned, the same principle underpinned the successful use of venturi-generated ground effects toward the end of the 1970s.

Stewart qualified third fastest at Watkins Glen and was chasing the leading McLarens in the same position when various maladies forced the Chaparralโ€™s retirement. Sub-par power from the JLO reduced downforce which, with deterioration of the track, caused unexpected tire wear. Then brakes started acting strange and the JLO vapor-locked itself into silence. Finally, Stewart missed one of the tricky shifts with the โ€œautomaticโ€ box, scrambling its internals, and the day was done.

โ€œI was impressed with Stewart,โ€ Hall recalled. โ€œJackie was fantastic. I was just astounded at his ability. We didnโ€™t have enough brakes, we had some other problems with the fans and skirts but he didnโ€™t complain about it. He soldiered on and did a hell of a job for us. He drove the bottom off that car.โ€

Hall was extremely satisfied with the services provided by Stewart at Watkins Glen, who extracted all of the carโ€™s considerable performance. In spite of a number of problems during practice he qualified it in third place behind the factory-team McLarens of Dan Gurney and Denny Hulme. Photo: Jim Hall Collection

Jackie was impressed as well, finding the 2J โ€œextraordinary, almost unbelievable. The car has remarkably good adhesion and itโ€™s certainly very easy to drive. Notwithstanding the difficulties weโ€™ve had with the fans pulling in dirt and fouling the belt drives, the carโ€™s traction, its ability to brake and go deeply into the corners, is something Iโ€™ve never experienced before in a car this size or bulk.โ€

Before the race was over the white trucks were headed back to Texas with the asphalt-splattered 2J. โ€œHall was disgusted,โ€ Paul Van Valkenburgh related. โ€œHe refused to put more of his own money into the project and because of its poor showing at the Glen sponsorship was unlikely. The 2J was disassembled and put into crates to be sent to the warehouse.โ€

But the makers of Lexan had been present at Watkins Glen to observe this car that used so much of their wonder material so effectively. In fact, the car carried small GE decals. When prompted by Don Gates, General Electric came to the party. GE put up sponsorship โ€œin the low five figuresโ€ to fund three more race appearances. Their support not extending to Jackie Stewartโ€™s fee, Hall installed Vic Elford, a driver of his Trans-Am Camaros, in the 2J. One of historyโ€™s most versatile drivers, โ€œQuick Vicโ€ quickly got the hang of this new-fangled racing car.

Briton Vic Elford drove the 2J in the three more Can-Am races it contested after Watkins Glen. Its speed was undeniable; Elford was on pole in all three races. At Road Atlanta the auxiliary engineโ€™s problems demoted him to sixth. A Chevrolet engine failure kept him from starting at Laguna Seca and at Riverside the auxiliary engine broke its crankshaft.

Skipping races at Mid-Ohio, Edmonton and Elkhart Lake, the 2J next appeared at Road Atlanta for the 189-mile Can-Am race on September 13th, 1970. This gave the Midland team a break to reassemble the โ€œsucker carโ€โ€”as it became knownโ€”and make some improvements. To help its JLO fight vapor-locking Gary Knutson converted it to fuel injection. Drive belts to the fans were moved out of the carโ€™s interior to an external position, shrouded by what its creators called a โ€œMartian braโ€.

Originally the cogged-rubber drive belts from the auxiliary engine to the two extractor fans were located inboard of the fans. This arrangement proved vulnerable to debris sucked up from the road, which dislodged the drive belts. During the season the belts were relocated outboard of the fans and enclosed by an exotic cover nicknamed by one crew member the โ€œMartian braโ€. The 2J’s engine exhaust emerged on both sides of its fans.

In early practice at the hilly Georgia track, the 2J was an astonishing three seconds a lap faster than the all-conquering McLarens using similar Chevrolet V-8 engines. In spite of their best efforts, Elford retained pole position by a 1.2-second margin. But in the first lap a fatigued ignition wire caused the JLO to start missing. A lengthy pit stop to diagnose and fix the problem kept Elford from finishing better than sixth place, six laps in arrears. However, at least the 2J had finished a race.

The next Can-Am was missed to concentrate on the two popular Californian events that concluded the championship. At Laguna Seca for the October 18th race, the 2J and Elford were in dominant form, breaking the one-minute mark while qualifying 1.8 seconds ahead of both McLarens. All was set for a dominant display when the 2Jโ€™s Chevrolet engine broke a connecting rod during the warm-up session on race-day morning.

Jim Hall leaned across Vic Elford into the cockpit of the 2J at Riverside in the radical carโ€™s last race appearance. Keeping the lap chart, Sandy Hall was protecting her eardrums. Although unsuccessful as a racing car, the 2J made history as the first automobile capable of generating so much suction downforce that it could be driven on the ceiling.

Regrouping for the race at Riverside near Los Angeles on November 1, Jim Hallโ€™s outfit had its 2J ready. On this longer circuit the margin of superiority in qualifying was the largest yet, 2.2 seconds over the fastest McLaren. An easy runaway was obviously on the cards. But soon after the start the JLO twin decided to break its crankshaft. With various pit stops the 2J struggled on, retiring after only five laps.

In spite of these profound disappointments GEโ€™s modest investment paid off, said the company. So sensational was the Chaparral 2J that more than 200 million press โ€œimpressionsโ€ were totted up by the unique racing car. However, there would be no more because the SCCA, convinced that a developed 2J would wipe the field in 1971, finally implemented the FIAโ€™s prohibition of โ€œmovable aerodynamic devices.โ€ The 2J had plenty of theseโ€”the blades of its twin fans and the suspension-linked rear skirts. It entered legislatively enforced retirement.

Vic Elford reunited with the Chaparral 2J at the Goodwood Festival in 2007.

A bizarre postscript to the 2J story was Gordon Murrayโ€™s use of fan-generated downforce for his Brabham BT46B of the 1978 Grand Prix season. After winning one race it was swiftly banned on the same basis as the Chaparral. By then modern underbody downforce was widely used after its efficacy was convincingly demonstrated by the Lotus 78 and Mario Andretti in 1977. Fathered by both Chevrolet and Chaparral, the 2J had been dramatically ahead of its time.