Re: A supercar? I think not! Piece of shit? LOL...it's a piece of BMW history, hardly shit.<!-- Signature -->
Re: A supercar? I think not! <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from Speedster</i> <b>13 horsepower? 1 cyl. top speed of 52 holy crap why is this peice of SHIT on here?</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->it's a classic. Give it some respect.<!-- Signature -->
Re: A supercar? I think not! This car is gay. Its only remembered cuz its the gayest car ever. lol. I don't think this qualifies as a supercar, explicit or implied.
Re: A supercar? I think not! <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from mangustapimp</i> <b>it was #$%#ing made to be light retard! you dont put a #$%#ing 2988 hp engine in what you want to be the lightest cr in the world</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE --> I don't think the mission was to make the lightest car in the world, otherwise it would have an aluminum body and Lexan glass (they probably didn't even have that back then, though) and it would be a convertible. But you have to give credit to the three wheels. It's like a backwards tricycle that drives itself. Pretty cool.<!-- Signature -->
This should be proof that just because a car has that famous Break My Wallet badge doesn't mean it warrants a place here. I consider a Fiat 500 an icon despite its many shortcomings but it shouldn't be on a website called supercars.net, and as far as I know, it isn't.