I hope Ferrari adds a driver add so the car can drive it self. Because the only thing that matters in cars are NUMBERS and a computer will necessarily be faster around a track than some #$%#ing dirty human. So Ferrari please make the car drive it self and set AWESOME numbers around tracks so all the boring Ferrari buyers/fans will have something to circle jerk around.
The more powerful car with AWD that also benefits from 10 more years of performance car development is the fastest of the two? shock.
why don't people understand that there is such a thing as "progression"? Only when a truly ground-breaking car comes out (McLaren F1 springs to mind) can it continually be up for comparison against much newer cars because nothing managed to beat it for 13 years. At the end of the day the Enzo is just another supercar, so of course after 10 years you'd expect the latest breed to be faster.
enzo's laptime ios almost ten years old, the track surely'd be not exactly the same, surely Stig is not the same (the latest Stig seems really fast).
why talking about Hock (Enzo never tested)? Why I cannot find any mention about 'Ring? <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/wink.gif"></A>
obligatory post mentioning FNAF could still be posting and we would all hate ferraris like we do k'seggs
REALLY?? Maybe i wrote this because someone said that the enzo can beat any actual lambo? My nickname is lamboy not blindboy, and i don't cry when a car is faster than another one, personally i think that a car wich after 10 years is still used as benchmark for performances really says it all about ferrari hypercars, but hey, keep it up
still a top member because of when he said the man flipped his corvette into a bus stop because of the shitty interior