mach 1 vs 300zx?

Discussion in '2003 Ford Mustang Mach 1' started by pb123, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. Re: mach 1 vs 300zx?

    ide have to say the mustang. ford does and excelent job of getting the hp to the rear wheel.
     
  2. who would win in a race between a mustang mach 1 (300hp) and a nissan
    300zx(300hp)? they both weight about the same, and they are both
    5-Speed manual. ?????<!-- Signature -->
     
  3. Re: mach 1 vs 300zx?

    I want to say the Stang but I am not sure. The hood is Carbon Fibre on the Stang, And It is A bit more responsive. I own one. (I know I say I own every car and I really do, I am a Lawyer but I live in a verry small house and built a Garage away from my house) <!-- Signature -->
     
  4. Re: mach 1 vs 300zx?

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from LamboOwner</i>
    <b>I want to say the Stang but I am not sure. The hood is Carbon Fibre on the Stang, And It is A bit more responsive. I own one. (I know I say I own every car and I really do, I am a Lawyer but I live in a verry small house and built a Garage away from my house) </b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->
    Your signature, a bit vulgar, but dead on. I saw a car, liked the look of it, wanted to see what someone else said about it, so here I am. It's all about the cars people. Not who's got the bigger dick.
    I don't have all the answers, but I do know that everybody makes some good cars, and everybody makes some crap cars. Well, mabey not lada. I guess their off roaders aren't too bad. Point is this is an automotive fellowship, not jsut another internet crap shoot.
    By the way people, if you're trying to make a point, do your best to use good spelling and grammar, because to me it all reflects how stupid it makes your comments sound.
    I'm glad ford's getting the performance picture with these newer mustangs. For years, they didn't have much to compete with. This is an O.K. car, but the gt40 is the only way to realy compete with the Z06 and Viper. The Vette needs something more too.
    IT'S ALL ABOUT THE CARS.
     
  5. Re: mach 1 vs 300zx?

    So does Nissan though, I dunno, it would be fun to watch (or participate<IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif"> ) I would bet on the Z. I've seen a Z with little modification, bought used, with bad turbos, smoke brand new Cobras. The drag is lower, the car sits lower for the turns, not to mention its great handling anyway. The torque given the 3 litre z with the TT setup allows it to deal with the torque of the 4.6 quite handily.<!-- Signature -->
     
  6. Re: mach 1 vs 300zx?

    300ZX is the best.
    It looks better as well
    even that is was designed in 1991 it still looks better than the Stang!!
     
  7. Re: mach 1 vs 300zx?

    yea its deffinetly all about the cars...and im willing to be this thing will have a considerable amount more horsepower than 300...after all it is a mach 1! i would deffinetly go with the stang of the nissan though..a good nible little car compared to the aging nissan ZXs
     

Share This Page