Neon owners... why???

Discussion in 'American Cars' started by AntiPimpage, Apr 29, 2007.

  1. They are J-bodies, Cavaliers and Sunfires.. and its j-body.org not marinewhodied.org. The marine who was killed is very clearly not the main subject of the site, its a feature/news piece on the home page.
     
  2. Yes, a Cavalier owner/member of that forum died.

    Why would I make fun of that.
     
  3. VICIOUS can make fun of whatever the hell he wants, even dead people.
     
  4. The only Neons worth getting are SRT4s and ACRs IMO.
     
  5. Your opinion is worth nothing.
     
  6. I hate driving through that freakin' place! *Knoxville* Such a pain...
     
  7. Haha, tell yourself that if it makes you feel better you big bad e-bully.
     
  8. #433 srsocx, May 3, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
    Somehow, I knew this thread would lead to the SSC Aeroshit.
     
  9. aaHAhaha
     
  10. SRT4 yea. ACR is nothing special.
     
  11. Front wheel drive cars are NOT performance cars, and by the time anyone could make one a performance car it would have so little in common with the original vehicle that it would defeat the purpose of purchasing the damn thing in the first place. Boost does not compensate for flawed traction delivery. Neon door handles and license plate illuminators only accentuate the stagnant reality in which Neon "performance enthusiasts" exist.
     
  12. ITS MY [email protected]
     
  13. Thats what drag cars are..

    Have you been to an IHRA event and seen the upper classes? Those aren't factory cars, those aren't even factory bodies.
     
  14.  
  15. siriusly, what's so hard about buying a cheap RWD car??
     
  16. 44 pages of shit to choose from about a crap car..who the #$%# would defend a crap car such as the Neon anyways?
     
  17. This just in: championship winning Integra teams in Speed World GT have just dropped their cars because some guy on the internet doesn't like fwd. They will be switching to cheaper 240Z platforms.
     
  18. <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/sad.gif"></A><A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/sad.gif"></A> I was going to say almost this exact thing.
     
  19. 240Z>Integra
     
  20. Just as it's silly to dislike a car (just) because it's FWD... it's also silly not to recognize that RWD > FWD.
     
  21. That's subjective though.

    There are plenty of great FWD cars in classes where there is no competent RWD competition.

    Noted: Integra

    Focus or Contour SVT
     
  22. the replica is done. if you want its not to late for me to add the turbo to make it a 917/10 engine. also I have some stuff for the 959 you might be interested in.
     
  23. Why then does a measly Audi TT with only 200hp and front wheel drive outhandle most of it's more powerfull rwd competitors?
    Plus there are lots of great handling hot hatches. Cars like the Renault Megane Sport Trophy, Golf GTI, Mazda 3 MPS, Civic Type-R, Mini Cooper S, Clio 182 etc etc etc.
     
  24. there are plenty of front wheel drive cars that are awesome to drive and sporty enough.
     
  25. Its competitors must not be as light. or it has better suspension. over all RWD>FWD for performance
     

Share This Page