Recent Content by TheRedWasp

  1. TheRedWasp
    Post

    $70,000 for a V6? STUPID!!!!!

    Neither the Z06 nor this car are anything but awesome. The Z06 is a $65,000 car that has been clocked at 3.4 seconds to 60. And this car is a...
    Post by: TheRedWasp, Oct 28, 2007 in forum: 2008 Nissan GT-R
  2. TheRedWasp
    Post

    400 bhp per liter.

    Is there an engine that develops more than that? 2.0L I-4 with 800 bhp...
    Post by: TheRedWasp, Mar 9, 2007 in forum: 2005 So-Cal HHR Bonneville
  3. TheRedWasp
    Post

    Nice Looking and Quite Fast

    Sub 3 seconds to 60, Top Speed over 220 mph, and an original, very nice design.
    Post by: TheRedWasp, Feb 28, 2007 in forum: 2007 Gumpert Apollo Sport
  4. TheRedWasp
    Post

    Holy Shit

    There's no way this thing takes 3.8 seconds to get to 60. 252 bhp and 1477 lbs... the 243 bhp Exige (weighing like 2000 lbs) does it in 3.9...
    Post by: TheRedWasp, Feb 28, 2007 in forum: 2007 Lotus Sport 2-Eleven
  5. TheRedWasp
    Post

    Faster but not as good looking.

    Even though the former model's look was older, I think it was better. Though I believe the past 3.2 pulled 0-60 in 6.3 seconds and this one can do...
    Post by: TheRedWasp, Feb 20, 2007 in forum: 2007 Audi TT 3.2 S-Line
  6. TheRedWasp
    Post

    Everyone is ignorant. This is a great car.

    Post by: TheRedWasp, Oct 28, 2006 in forum: 1956 AC Ace-Bristol
  7. TheRedWasp
    Post

    The only good oldsmobile

    Wow. I've owned three oldsmobiles. I have to disagree.
    Post by: TheRedWasp, Oct 22, 2006 in forum: 1966 Oldsmobile 442 W30
  8. TheRedWasp
    Post

    what the hecks an inline-4????

    I can't believe it has 4.1 liters per cylinder. That's bigger than the average engine today.
    Post by: TheRedWasp, Oct 22, 2006 in forum: 1907 Renault 130HP Grand Prix
  9. TheRedWasp
    Thread

    RX-8 performance for $220g

    Thank goodness for the GT/luxury quality.
    Thread by: TheRedWasp, Oct 20, 2006, 1 replies, in forum: 1996 Aston Martin V8 Coupe
  10. TheRedWasp
    Post

    POS Cars

    This is a great car! Any car that can get you from 0-60: 5.6 seconds for under $20,000 is exceptional. Its one of the best bang-for-the-buck...
    Post by: TheRedWasp, Aug 15, 2006 in forum: 1956 Chevrolet Corvette
  11. TheRedWasp
    Post

    3.5 seconds?

    It only surprises me because it also has 780 lb/ft of torque.
    Post by: TheRedWasp, Aug 15, 2006 in forum: 2006 Pagani Zonda F Roadster
  12. TheRedWasp
    Post

    doesn't look like a saturn

    I'd say its an improvement.
    Post by: TheRedWasp, Aug 15, 2006 in forum: 2007 Saturn Sky Roadster
  13. TheRedWasp
    Post

    Re: It,s not a nice car...

    It was quite a bit more than the Careera GT of it's time... they both can do 0-60: 3.6 seconds. One is 18 years newer. The 959 was the best...
    Post by: TheRedWasp, Jul 11, 2006 in forum: 1998 Porsche 911 GT1 ’98
  14. TheRedWasp
    Post

    MCKAREN KICKS THE PIECE OF SHIT'S ASS

    And that clearly explains why the GT1 is 0.5 seconds quicker to 100 mph and at that point would have the lead in the race. I don't think your...
    Post by: TheRedWasp, Jul 11, 2006 in forum: 1998 Porsche 911 GT1 ’98 Straßenversion