Separate names with a comma.
UGGH!! <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0"...
It is cheap! For the price of the 1.25mil McLaren F1, you could buy this plus you can throw in a Maybach and still have some cash left over! Nor...
Now it's more than 5 tons and makes 100 in 7.7! Now that's fast for somethin this big, even with 500 hp. It is pretty cool, too.
Freaky man! Imagine driving this down a road and when the driver in the car up front sees you in his mirror and you're revving as hell, it's as if...
It deserves better..
Woah, wait a sec before you post. I don't hate Jap cars, and really, I drool for them, but this looks just like one of the few Crappy designs some...
Man i could imagine the scream of that V12. It musta been some form of an F1 engine.. Why didn't they put that in the Enzo?
50 hp/L and 230 hp from a 4.7 is sooo pathetic and typical of american gas-guzzlers.
Man, the retro cues turn a potential killer into a pile of damn_shit. ;p
At last! The first SUBSTANTIAL car worth looking at from Ford. The V12's still bad, though, with quad-turbos and just 700+ hp. They shoulda given...
MAN! I expect a quad-turbo V12 to make some 1300++ hp if the Veilside Supra makes 1040 hp from a 3 liter V6!
God, this has more power. Only made me wish Lambo put more power into their flagship.
155 hp is pretty big for an NA 1.0
This is a 1-seater isn't it? Then why is the driver's seat off-center?
This Camaro was developed merely for the "unmotorsportlike" sport of straight-line drag racing, I'm pretty sure.
I'll take instead the 911GT2, or maybe even a Boxster. For Performance, I'll take the Mclaren, and for value, the Skyline R34 GT-R
I'll take instead the 911GT2, or maybe even a Boxster. For Performance, I'll take the Mclaren, and for value, the Skyline R34
I've been pondering on this a long time- the C12 doesn't look like a 'Vette. Why then did they call it the Callaway Corvette?
This Caddy is definitely worth a look.