Re: 16/4 =? see guys. thas fare enough. people that don't like a car should say that it sucks. They should say stuff more like wot supramans said.
Re: 16/4 =? I soppose though CRXs are rather cheap.So I guess for the price of a CRX one could get an Eclipse GSX(early 90's) or Nissan 240SX(late 80's/early 90's) I too would consider either one a better car so yeah.But I still think CRXs are cool atleast in my opinion.
Re: 16/4 =? i would get the eclipse, seen as i've never seen 1 before, cos they don't ship them to NZ
Re: 16/4 =? NZ = New Zealand OZ = Australia (mate<A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/wink.gif"></A>)
Re: 16/4 =? I see now,k thnx...since we are discussing where abouts we are from,I'm from AZ,USA. (just in case,AZ=Arizona)heh
Re: hey everybody,16/4 means 16 cylinders and 4 turbos hence the 16/4 that's it bottomline,end of story.
Re: Re: Naw the way I look at it is,turbos are more important than the valves so I'm assuming the number 4 stands for how many turbos it has. Makes sense right,because it is a 16 cylinder,quad(4)turbo charged engine after all.
Re: Re: Then why would they call the previous concepts for this 16/4 when they didnt even have turbos!(some of them). The valves per cylinder is the only other thing it could mean, and trust me, a 72 valve engine is important!
Re: 16/4 =? supraman i think your right becuase you cant call something somthing it isnt eg. GTO twin turbo.. when it doesnt ahve a twin turbo it would make no sence at all.
Re: 16/4 =? the other thing is the 18/3 chiron. 18 cylinders. 3 valves per cylinder. 18/4 Veyron 18 cylinders, 4 valves per cylinder (no turbos)
Re: 16/4 =? Thats exactly my arguement! Read the first few pages of this thread, and thats what i was trying to say.
Re: Well that was just my assumption,that it stood for 16 cylinder,quad turbo (16/4).I had no idea that there were some 16/4s with no turbos,I'm not the biggest fan of this car.Also 'SupraMan' I never said that the valves aren't important,I said that they probably aren't as important as having quad turbos,or as noteworthy if you will.that's why I thought it stood for four turbos,but I think you might be right so I'm done now.