16/4 =?

Discussion in '2002 Bugatti 16/4 Veyron Preproduction' started by ilovevipers, Aug 20, 2002.

  1. Re: 16/4 =?

    In typical ghetto fashion(even though I'm not ghetto)I would just like to say,WORD.
     
  2. Re: 16/4 =?

    Its just My opinion, i dont thin theyre cool, there are better cars for the price.
     
  3. Re: 16/4 =?

    see guys. thas fare enough. people that don't like a car should say that it sucks. They should say stuff more like wot supramans said.
     
  4. Re: 16/4 =?

    I soppose though CRXs are rather cheap.So I guess for the price of a CRX one could get an Eclipse GSX(early 90's) or Nissan 240SX(late 80's/early 90's) I too would consider either one a better car so yeah.But I still think CRXs are cool atleast in my opinion.
     
  5. Re: 16/4 =?

    i would get the eclipse, seen as i've never seen 1 before, cos they don't ship them to NZ
     
  6. Re: 16/4 =?

    Same here, they dont ship them to OZ either.
     
  7. Re: 16/4 =?

    NZ,OZ? Where the freak are you guys from?

    (Boy Do I feel stupid..sigh..)
     
  8. Re: 16/4 =?

    NZ = New Zealand
    OZ = Australia (mate<A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/wink.gif"></A>)
     
  9. Re: 16/4 =?

    I see now,k thnx...since we are discussing where abouts we are from,I'm from AZ,USA. (just in case,AZ=Arizona)heh
     
  10. Re: 16/4 =?

    yep, i know that 1
     
  11. Re: 16/4 =?

    SENTENCE
     
  12. Re: 16/4 =?

    What about the sentence?
     
  13. Re:

    hey everybody,16/4 means 16 cylinders and 4 turbos hence the 16/4 that's it bottomline,end of story.
     
  14. Re: Re:

    i thought it was 16 cylinders, and 4 valves per cylinder
     
  15. Re: 16/4 =?

    no, u said word, i say sentence
     
  16. Re: Re:

    Naw the way I look at it is,turbos are more important than the valves so
    I'm assuming the number 4 stands for how many turbos it has.
    Makes sense right,because it is a 16 cylinder,quad(4)turbo charged engine
    after all.
     
  17. Re: 16/4 =?

    lol
     
  18. Re: Re:

    Then why would they call the previous concepts for this 16/4 when they didnt even have turbos!(some of them). The valves per cylinder is the only other thing it could mean, and trust me, a 72 valve engine is important!
     
  19. Re: 16/4 =?

    supraman i think your right becuase you cant call something somthing it isnt eg. GTO twin turbo.. when it doesnt ahve a twin turbo it would make no sence at all.
     
  20. Re: Re:

    Thats the other thing i had stuck in the back on my head. Thanks for getting it out Supraman
     
  21. Re: 16/4 =?

    No problem fellas.
     
  22. Re: 16/4 =?

    the other thing is the 18/3 chiron. 18 cylinders. 3 valves per cylinder. 18/4 Veyron 18 cylinders, 4 valves per cylinder (no turbos)
     
  23. Re: 16/4 =?

    Thats exactly my arguement! Read the first few pages of this thread, and thats what i was trying to say.
     
  24. Re:

    Well that was just my assumption,that it stood for 16 cylinder,quad turbo
    (16/4).I had no idea that there were some 16/4s with no turbos,I'm not the biggest fan of this car.Also 'SupraMan' I never said that the valves aren't important,I said that they probably aren't as important as having
    quad turbos,or as noteworthy if you will.that's why I thought it stood for four turbos,but I think you might be right so I'm done now.

     
  25. Re: 16/4 =?

    we think very alike supraman
     

Share This Page