C63!! First there was the C32, which was pretty cool, then the C55 (without Kompressor) which is a little bigger and now the 63 ! Notice its not the 510bhp of the ML 63 <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/sad.gif"></A>
its the same 481 bhp 6.2-litres engine as the CLK 63 AMH: >>> www.supercars.net/PitLane?viewThread=y&gID=3&fID=0&tID=95216
It would take a fool to not realise they'd be using the 63 in the C-class, just as they will be in all the AMG models.
no, because the RS4 can handle it's 4.2 V8, which is about right for a car this size, the M3's gonna have a 4.0 V8 isn't it? thats probably right for that, but a 6.3 V8 in a car this size, just no
I never said that they weren't whoring the engine, and atleast they have enough brains to use the engine in theyr most expensive sedans. So next time shut up pretty boy
Mercedes doesn't know how to build sports cars. SportAuto tested the CL63 AMG.It was only a few tens of a second faster than the Quattroporte which is heavier(more than 100kg) and less powerful (60hp).
why is anyone surprised by this? they designed the "63" engine to be small enough to fit into a C-class...
It just seems like overkill. It might be compact for an engine its size, but I'm sure it's heavy as all f*ck.