2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

Discussion in '2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S' started by love of cars, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    Ok, you're done. You just did it, you are done speaking.
    ............ ............. .............
    That's what I thought.
     
  2. #77 SpOnkey21, Feb 19, 2003
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
    Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    if youre not actually going to say anything SHUT THE HELL UP DUMBA$$!!!
    Check their web site if you don't believe me dip$hit. www.koenigsegg.com and while youre at it go learn a thing or two from the debate club at your local junior high or something. learn to use facts to back up your arguments, thats why youve got the grey matter between your ears.
     
  3. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    dude, ur a #$%#!n babe, shut the hell up and stop criticizing and ordering people. Your not a car designer and ur not worth ne more space on this website, go away.

    I beleive the McLaren is a wonderful car. I beleive its performance in all aspects is greater than almost any car in the world. But the CC8s has the advantage of almost 10 years in advancements in technology. The CC8S is faster in the quarter, achieves a higher degree of grip, and in my opinion, looks a lot better. It is a true drivers car. The removable hardtop and luxurious interior w/ AC and Cd player are just examples. It uses new alloys and fibers that where not available at the prices they are now when the Mac was first made. The mac was a revolution, this is an evolution. nuff said
     
  4. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    dude, ur a #$%#!n babe, shut the hell up and stop criticizing and ordering people. Your not a car designer and ur not worth ne more space on this website, go away.

    I beleive the McLaren is a wonderful car. I beleive its performance in all aspects is greater than almost any car in the world. But the CC8s has the advantage of almost 10 years in advancements in technology. The CC8S is faster in the quarter, achieves a higher degree of grip, and in my opinion, looks a lot better. It is a true drivers car. The removable hardtop and luxurious interior w/ AC and Cd player are just examples. It uses new alloys and fibers that where not available at the prices they are now when the Mac was first made. The mac was a revolution, this is an evolution. nuff said
     
  5. #80 carguy8007, Feb 22, 2003
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
    Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    Why do you post completely in capital letters?
    If you're trying to get attention, you certainly have succeeded, everyone who views this page can see a real dumba--
    I would take the Koenigsegg. Ok, its not obvious who is faster, there hasn't been an SCCA certified test on the 2002 CC yet, don't ask me why. It will be posted on www.koenigsegg.com when it does happen. The calculation is 240 mph, but anything could happen. I would take the Koenigsegg regardless of the topspeed, though.
    Here's why:
    Superior torque characteristics to that of the Mclaren
    Better looking
    Cheaper
    A lot nicer and quieter interior
     
  6. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    ok....YOU SHUT THE **** UP
     
  7. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    and.......YOU SHUT THE **** UP
     
  8. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    rrright
     
  9. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    Mclaren F1.
     
  10. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    Koenigsegg.
     
  11. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    Hard to say 4 me.....facing facts, I guess I have to go with
    CC8S
     
  12. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    Koenigsegg no competition, cheaper, faster, it looks nicer too.
     
  13. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    Mclaren F1 wins by performance claims by independent media test and Le Mans winner by their first try. Can Koenigsegg do so???
     
  14. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    have koenigsegg tried to?

     
  15. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    k. this is what we are talking about. 2 cars with a few years between them.
    straight out of the block. the cc has better down force and therefor handling. the only reason the mac has a higher top spd is because it has less down force and therefore less drag.
    but i mean the mac is older so it isnt a fair comparison anyway.

    like my name heh lol. cyaz
     
  16. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    Ok, first of all, I'm confused here..........you said "this is what we are talking about" and you said "it isnt a fair comparison".
    Which do you go with????
    Second of all, IT IS A FAIR COMPARISON!!! Anyone that posts crap like that needs a catscan. Just because a car is older than a car that it's being compared to, it doesnt mean that it is not fair. The Mac is still in its time and still reigns. There are old Comaros & Mustangs from the 60s and 70s that are matched/compared with new ones, tuned or not tuned, and make it fair comparison. Just because someone doesnt like a car over another, they should never use their opinion over facts for comparison! Is that really so hard to understand?! No. It's not.
     
  17. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    A much faster 1/4 mile. 10.0 vs 11.6 seconds. I think a bit of 0-60 performance would have been sacrafice to give this car better mid-speed acceleration
     
  18. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    Possibly,.......
     
  19. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    sorry guys, the Koeniggseg is faster than the mac, I saw a head to haed tset, and the only thing the mac was faster at was 0-60, and even then only by about.2 seconds

    Plus, the koeniggseg sticks better, has better handling, and is more luxurious. Also, speaking to what some of you dick faces said about the mclaren being a revolution, and how it came out so long ago..... well that's just mot reason to not want it, the koeniggseg has newer technology, and is over a better car.....plus it looks a lot better
     
  20. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    Where did you get that information??
    Not that I dont believe you, but I want to know where you got it.
     
  21. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    Koenigsegg CC8S because:
    It is better looking IMO
    It is faster for cheaper
    The targa rooftop
    Its newer
    the list could go on...
     
  22. Re: My ass looks better than this car

    yearh... and when you have bought a Koenigsegg in stead of a McLaren you have about half a million to make it faster.
    Therefore i stick wiith the Koenigsegg... but also because i only got 75 minutes of driving to their factory ;o)
    (It's only a matter of time before i own one of theese cars <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/amazed.gif"></A>)

    And if your ass looks better than this car... why don't you become an ass-model?

     
  23. Re: My ass looks better than this car

    Because the model companies told me he wouldnt have a chance
    against you.
     
  24. Re: My ass looks better than this car

    That's an old post and he's gone back on what
    he's said.
    ....
    He agrees now that the CC8S is
    the winner here.
    He's been convinced, and still a great fan of both, and same for me.
     
  25. Re: 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S vs 1997 McLaren F1

    Numbers and tech data are all fine and good but it finally comes down to which flavor do you fancy most. With similar performance it's hard to decide whether the koenigsegg is better than the f1. The F1 uses a less organic approach to its fascia to portray a race car in civilized attire, while the koenigsegg has a very softened shape and at the same time retains an aggressive stance and grin. Personally, I would go with the f1, mostly because I've been in love with it for all these years. But what does it matter? If Halley Berry and Carmen Electra were presented before you, could you really choose that quickly?


    In a perfect world, we would have both.
     

Share This Page