209 ft-lbs of torque?!

Discussion in '2000 Porsche 911 GT3 R' started by freshnate, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. Wat is up with this, the low torque makes me sick, but i love the car.
     
  2. Re: 209 ft-lbs of torque?!

    race cars do not have a whole lot of torque you idiot. they only have alot of hp.
     
  3. Re: 209 ft-lbs of torque?!

    You idiot race cars DO have a lot of torque it just depends on the car. F1 cars have nearly "non-existant" (of course not literally) torque, the higher revving the engine the lower the torque number. You shouldn't call someone an idiot if you don't have the facts (you should period, but I was trying to make a point).
     
  4. Re: 209 ft-lbs of torque?!

    hum...tell me if i'm wrong, but where do you see 209FT-lb's of torque in "Torque 380 nm / 280.3 ft lbs @ 7000 rpm?" cuz to me that says 280.3FT lb's
     
  5. Re: 209 ft-lbs of torque?!

    Exactly!

    You guys know the 0-60?

    ..... 3.2 seconds.

    0-100?

    ..... 6.8 seconds.

    there you have it.
     
  6. Re: 209 ft-lbs of torque?!
     
  7. Re: 209 ft-lbs of torque?!

    Oh almost forgot to meantion...in case you wonder, I am unsure about the top speed...I'll find that out as soon as I can.



    If you want to find me in the forums, I'm always in the Koenigsegg and McLaren forums.

     
  8. Re: 209 ft-lbs of torque?!

    Keep in mind, that this engine is naturally aspired. so the torque is pretty good for an engine this size.
     
  9. Re: y does EVERYONE hate American Cars?

    ?
    Try the Mclaren Forums mate.
     
  10. Re: y does EVERYONE hate American Cars?

    GT3 is a nomal aspirated race car, sure it doesn't has too much torque..
     

Share This Page