i like the way it looks.....except those taillights are hideous. the performance specs are pretty retarded, they shouldnt use "computer simulated" if they want to be taken seriously...6sec qtr mile? lmfao......obviously that part is written by some idiot with no concept of what suspension is needed to get the traction necessary for that. and i sure as hell wouldnt want to try going 300mph in a removable hardtop.
Acceleration 0-60 mph under 1.5 seconds (calculated)* new supercar record 1/4 mile ET 6.6 seconds @ 204 mph (calculated)* new supercar record Top Speed 314 mph (calculated)* new supercar record shit.
Looks alright for an American car <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/smile.gif"></A> Let's just hope this isn't another joke like that Project (4 figures) car that never was released.
LOL @ perfomance Acceleration 0-60 mph under 1.5 seconds (calculated)* new supercar record 1/4 mile ET 6.6 seconds @ 204 mph (calculated)* new supercar record Love to see the actual results as a rwd on street tyres... if it ever gets past prototype. However, I do like the design. EDIT: I take that back about liking the design...just saw the rear.
It looks like that one short wheelbase car design that keeps getting ripped off over and over and over and over, every time someone want to create a new low-production high performance vehicle.
Looks alright, specs are so lol. I don't know why companies lie about their stats like that, it just makes them look like they totally don't have their shit together.
typical americans talking shit up and blowing their own trumpets, with nothing to back it up. also looks somehwat like a 458, but ugly