Re: Edonis VS Murcielago the edonis can kick a murcielago butt, styling not as nice, though, and it costs 500,000 pounds+. it comes out June-July 2002<!-- Signature -->
Re: Edonis VS Murcielago <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from RCChris</i> <b>They are planning to bulid 21 because they only have 21 EB110 tubs...</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE --> What ????? 21 cars for 21 centuries (gregorian calendar). The last frames of the Bugatti EB 110 are used by Dauer with the Dauer EB 110.
Re: Edonis VS Murcielago what is the gregorian calendar? i think this would defintely win. actually this just started production i think because i checked it out in the motor trend thing and personally i think the top speed of this wil be much higher considering it has more hp than this
Re: Edonis VS Murcielago <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from blaze4eva</i> <b>what is the gregorian calendar? i think this would defintely win. actually this just started production i think because i checked it out in the motor trend thing and personally i think the top speed of this wil be much higher considering it has more hp than this</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE --> It's the calendar we have (at the opposite of the muslim one) , established by the Pope grégoire (French translation of his name). I hope I'm not mistaken about the name.
Re: Edonis VS Murcielago I do believe that I don't care. If someone had one and started whining about the other one being better, I'd smack him until he was permanently brain damaged.<!-- Signature -->
Re: Edonis VS Murcielago hmm, thugz, ur so passionat for other peoples feelings.the merc would rock this thing.at first when i say this car i was quite excited, but as i look closer,this car really isnt that pleasing to the eye.its lines are marred and look unorganized.it may have performance, but without style, whats the point?<!-- Signature -->
Re: Edonis VS Murcielago This thing would truly rape the Murcielago, In its final production version with 720hp. I'm not very big on the styling myself but i can over look that for the performance, maybe!
Re: Edonis VS Murcielago didn't they start production already? it was shown in 2001<!-- Signature -->
Re: Edonis VS Murcielago They are planning to bulid 21 because they only have 21 EB110 tubs...So what's the point in comparing a car which has a quad-turbo engine to a lovely car which has none and the fact that the Edonis costs 4 times as much as the Murcielago....Bang for the buck..I'd take the Murcielago..Styling wise, I'd also take the the Murcielago.<!-- Signature -->
Re: Edonis VS Murcielago Yes, only 21 chassis avaliable for use so only 21 cars will be built to a very exclusive buyer
Re: Edonis VS Murcielago not a good comparison try mclaren f1 and edonis or bugatti 16/4 veyron and this or the koenisegg
Re: Edonis VS Murcielago Edonis will kick Lambo's ass not good for 0-60mph still can pick up speed do beat lambo
Re: Edonis VS Murcielago murcialago both performance and style wise the murc is the best lookin car out there!
Re: Edonis VS Murcielago Edonis any time, even if it would cost 10 times a murcielago... <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/smile.gif"></A>
Re: Edonis VS Murcielago i would take murcielago. i'm not a turbo fan and this thing is ugly. from an unknown brand i would be sus on the build quality too. evo also rates this car as only 4 stars when murcielago gets 5.
Re: Edonis VS Murcielago This thing has 100 hp more than the Murcielago and weighs less than half; if this info is correct. I would take the Edonis in a second. But I agree with Zerallamvuut, bad comparison.
Re: Edonis VS Murcielago question? it says 1400 something pounds and 680 horses, but only does 4.2 60 time??????? based on these stats(even though they may be wrong) im going with the murc which also plus it looks better.
Re: Edonis VS Murcielago MrPopo is right. How can a car having pretty much 1 hp per kilogram have such poor performance? If you compare such a ratio with other cars, this car should be doing 0-60, for example in around 2.5 seconds, or 0-100 in around 4-5