It doesn't matter how big the price is, it's still shit. CCXR would be lucky enough to even pass the Zonda. The Gumpert costs less, looks better, And kicks ass. It's a 4.7 mil difference. You have to be drunk/high/retarded as fvck to actually price it that high. I bet it only costs like $200,000 to make it.
The Zonda can't even be mentioned in the same sentence as CCXR, especially the Trevita and Edition variants. As far as Gumpert is concerned, the car is a pos and they would be lucky to sell 20 examples, not to mention it would get shat on by Trevita/Edition/Agera. Oh and that pos is pretty much invisible next to a CCXR.
Let me know when the Zonda first manages to best the old CCR around Hockenheim, or the prototype CCX on the TopGear track.
What about the 11 other cars that are faster than the CCR around Hockenheim and all significantly cheaper? Some of which are also much heavier and all of which are less powerful. http://www.fastestlaps.com/track7.html
I'm never gotta stop, waiting to see what he'll post in response is like waiting for Christmas morning.
I'm sure the CCR's lap could be further improved with some suspension adjustments and better track conditions, but it doesn't really matter now. Koenigsegg have now released the Agera, their most track focused car yet, and one that will destroy just about anything that's streetable.
I don't care, even if it is really fast, its not worth 5 fvcking million. Just get over the fact that the Koenigsegg isn't the fastest car in the world, theres always something out there that can take it. If you like the car that much, you can continue your orgasms over on youtube. The rest of us will be talking about OTHER supercars.
No doubt, if I had a ton of money I wouldn't even consider something else. Zonda has mad swagger, which really is the most important thing when buying a supercar.
I do actually think Raging Balls has major mental problems. No troll would go this far for this long surely...