Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Other Countries' started by GTHOPHASE3 4 eva, Oct 11, 2010.
Is a kinda good looking car, embarrassingly.
Did Mike Simcoe(sp?) have anything to do with it?
I'd rather have a Kia Cerato/Forte.
My brother just bought one. It is a nice looking car.
Pretty gutless though.
yeah i wouldn't expect it to have a decent engine or be dynamic to drive. just looks alright and its decent value too i suppose. a crappier passat if you will.
Get the diesel!
Pretty nice interiors.
The diesels are actually quite gutsy by small car standards. There are a lot worse in the category.
Also ... Cruze = 100000000000000 times better than the Epica was.
The Insignia would be nice though.
Yeah, I have to admit it is a good looking thing. Stupid name though.
in USA it has like 260hp and 6spd or something and handles better than a 328i
by the time you put an average american in it with its cup holders full of bug gulps and 20kgs worth of mcdonalds for the ride home from work it doesnt handle better
Better than a Cobalt.
americans are fat
that's why they need bigger engines
I can get by with only 1700cc. It even spins the tires like mad in the wet.
that's because your engine is cheating with vtec
I have the non-VTEC version, I think. <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/sad.gif"></A>
I had one of these as a rental car and it had the most gutless engine I've ever driven. But the most puzzling thing is why even with a 6 speed auto gearbox the first two gears are so long. It makes having so many gears pointless.
a nice car... rather have a Kia Forte
thats pretty unfortunate <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/sad.gif"></A>
But thats what they say about the petrol version. The diesel is meant to be much better.
This one right? We only get the 2.0 diesel and I really like it, 150hp isn't gutless, at least not by Indian standards.
I've only seen a 138hp version. :s