HP/L

Discussion in '1966 Dino 206 S' started by bodaciousbob, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. How many other cars in 1966 had 109 HP/l?
    Not too many thats for damn sure.... gotta hand it to Ferrari<!-- Signature -->
     
  2. Re: HP/L

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from bodaciousbob</i>
    <b>How many other cars in 1966 had 109 HP/l?
    Not too many thats for damn sure.... gotta hand it to Ferrari</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->i couldnt agree more! look at the benz too, i dont think there are very many n/a engines today that can get those kinda figures<!-- Signature -->
     
  3. Re: HP/L

    In 1966 lots of cars had these figures. No emissions laws anywhere. Besides, on a small engine, that's easy. Give me an "inneficient" 454 pumping 450 horses. I'll outrun you're more expensive, more "efficient" Ferrari.
     
  4. Re: HP/L

    who said a damn thing about that?!<!-- Signature -->
     
  5. Re: HP/L

    The post is about Specific Output, I was pointing out that it's not anything. You can go ahead and believe you're rice rockets are better, buzz bomber. I like this car a lot. But it's Specific Output doesn't mean anything.
     

Share This Page