i beat one

Discussion in '1994 Ford Mustang GT' started by 2000v6, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. Re: i beat one

    "Otherwise you are pulling numbers out of your vagina."
    No, I'm pulling my penis out of your girlfriends vagina, the numbers are coming from a respectable magazine.
     
  2. Re: i beat one

    It`s a process known as "baiting". Can`t claim their Mach 1 is a 13.1 machine, if the faster SS is running 13.3`s now can they?

    Wake up. Pull your head out of your Mustang`s ass.
     
  3. Re: i beat one

    Hey retard, that article was written way before anybody even knew the mach 1 was going to be built. Why don't you get SuperMoronOnes dick out of your mouth.
     
  4. Re: i beat one

    Big words for a guy with a car that runs a 14.7 mile quarter mile. <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/smile.gif"></A>
     
  5. Re: i beat one

    Low 14's to high 13's, but then I don't expect anything else from somebody who drives an imaginary car.
     
  6. Re: i beat one

    Hes not lying, i have that magazine around somewhere.
     
  7. Re: i beat one

    I have the car and driver mag right in front of me.

    0-60 in 6 flat
    1/4 mile in 14.7 seconds.


    read it and weep, your car is pretty slow.
     
  8. Re: i beat one

    You don`t need the magazine...its on MM&FF`s website.

    It doesn`t mean sh*t. They are the only ones to pull those numbers. Every other magazine calls the Mach 1 a high 13 car. Even Ford doesn`t claim such ridiculousness......
     
  9. Re: i beat one

    Your car must be a high 15 second car then, since they ran a HIGHLY MODDED 300zx to a mid 14 second 1/4 mile. I'm tired of this debate, the newer GT's are high 13 second cars, your a dumbass if you believe otherwise.
    Boredup...well same goes for you...
     
  10. Re: i beat one

    "highly modded"? So a body kit, carbon fiber interior kit, wheels, intake, exhaust and jets makes it highly modded? I have the car and driver issue where a STOCK 300zx ran a 13.8 with a 5 flat 0-60 time.

    They ran the SMZ which is running 12PSI on 17inch front and 18inch back wheels to a 14.1, is a 14.1 a MID 14 second car or a low 14 second car?

    Car and Driver also ran the Kenny Brown 320X Mustang GT which has a "claimed" 320HP to a 14.1 second quartermile. So you think your less powerful mustang is faster? Expalin that for me if you can.

    You are pathetic <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/smile.gif"></A>
     
  11. Re: i beat one

    Highly modded 300zx meaning over 400hp running a low 14 second quarter mile...lol...and yet your stock one can run it faster...lol.

     
  12. Re: i beat one

    The SMZ does not have over 400HP. The GTZ does but they only managed to get that into the low 11's.

    Get you're facts stright.
     
  13. Re: i beat one

    if Superlative can say that he ran a 13.8 with his car STOCK, which is what the best Magainze ran with it, then why cant i use the best magazine time for the car im comparing?
     
  14. Re: i beat one

    Because him and SuperMoronOne are bed buddies.
     
  15. Re: i beat one

    brimming with intellect
     
  16. Re: i beat one

    If it was the same magazine, you can't.

    If anyone else besides MMFF ran high 13's with the GT, I would buy it. But seems like everyone else is running low 14's.

    MM&FF amazingly runs about .5 a second faster than EVERYONE else. But it couldn't be them.....
     
  17. Re: i beat one

    Because I did. and I only use C&D numbers. There is a euro mag. that took the 300zx to a 13.5 second quarter mile. I don't quote that because I do not live in Europe.

     
  18. Re: i beat one

    Bullshit.
     
  19. Re: i beat one

    Keep on thinking that if it makes your car feel faster.
     
  20. Re: i beat one

    It's faster then what you think they are, almost a full second faster.
     
  21. Re: i beat one

    not according to Car and Driver the most realistic car magazine out there. Your ass is not a good place to pull numbers out of, they are a little murkey.
     
  22. Re: i beat one

    Car and Driver sucks when it comes to quarter mile times kid. It seems if it has more then 200hp they can't handle it.
     
  23. Re: i beat one

    I said they are realistic. R&T got a 2.6 second 0-60 time with an 800HP viper on a wet track, making them less than realistic compared to an average Joe.

    Lucky for them the Mustang has just a hair over 200HP so I guess they did as best as they could.


    Quit making excuses, just absorb the truth that you car is slow.
     
  24. Re: i beat one

    Abosrb what truth, taht you are wrong about 99% of everything you post?
    The mustang GT (for the 100th time) will run the quarter mile in high 13s. If that's slow then fine my car is slow, but then your car is also slow, and 95% of cars on the road are slow...

    "Lucky for them the Mustang has just a hair over 200HP so I guess they did as best as they could."
    60hp is more then a hair over 200hp, and having over 300lb-ft of torque is quit nice.
     
  25. Re: i beat one

    umm the 1994 mustang Gt has 215HP.

    As soon as you pull FACTUAL numbers from an unbiased realistic source, I will believe you. Until than, for the hundredth time the mustang runs a 14.7 second quarter mile according to the may 2001 issue of car and driver, which just so happens to be an unbias realistic source.


    Torque means nothing in 3rd gear, go race a stock 300zxTT and find out for yourself.
     

Share This Page