i sat in this

Discussion in '1994 Lamborghini Diablo VT' started by Lambo Freak, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. Re: VT performances

    Great car period.
  2. Re: VT performances

    Ths is my favorite car, not for its spees or acceleration, because there are a lot of faster cheaper cars out there, but the awesome Vicious Traction AWD system it has, and because its one of the few real exotic cars out there.

    If you want to see the potential of the VT AWD system play Need for Speed 1 for PLAY STATION and look for the videos of the car showcase, you won't regret it.
  3. Re: VT performances

    i like the name of the 4wd system, Visious Traction, sounds awesome<!-- Signature -->
  4. Re: VT performances

    pretty good for its age<!-- Signature -->
  5. i dont like lambos...

    I dont like the look of lambos but i defedently respect the performance.
  6. Re: i dont like lambos...

    lamborghini Diablo is definatelythe best car ever.
  7. The real performances of VT

    Diablo vt tested by quattroruote (Italy) 4/1993
    top speed 325.2kmh
    0-100kmh 4.6s
    0-200 13.33s
    0-400m 12.29s (191.7kmh)
    0-1000m 21.96s (249.2kmh)
    0-1mile 30.35s (271.6kmh)
  8. Re: The real performances of VT

    so the stats are pretty acurate<!-- Signature -->
  9. Re: The real performances of VT

    wow. 1/4 mile was faster than I thought. 12.3 seconds at 119 mph. The Diablo 6.0 tested only 0.4 seconds faster on the 1/4 mile, at 2 mph faster. that's not much.
  10. Re: The real performances of VT

    By the way, The stats on this site are actually not right. The site says 0-60 mph in 4.6 seconds, but that is 0-100 km/h (62 mph). The Diablo has to change gears after 60 mph, so the last half second is used just changing gears. 0-60 mph would actually be around 3.9 seconds or something. and 0-100 mph is actually around 9.2 seconds.
  11. Re: The real performances of VT

    I just need to say 2 things 1. this car is damn good.... 2.THE LIFE IS SHORT IF YOU DONT HAVE A LAMBORGHINI <!-- Signature -->
  12. Real performances

    "Mafalda" has already posted the correct figures for the 1993 DIablo VT, 492 hp.

    0-62 mph: 4.6 seconds (but 0-60 mph approx 3.9 seconds)*
    0-100 mph: approx. 9.2 seconds
    1/4 mile: 12.29 seconds @ 119.0 mph
    1 km standing: 21.96 seconds
    Top speed: 202 mph

    *The DIablo can do 60 mph in 1st gear, but needs to be in 2nd gear to arrive at 62 mph. Because the Diablo uses the metal shift gate and it takes a long time to get from 1st to 2nd gear, there exists a big differnce in time between 0-60 mph and 0-62 mph (100 kmh).
  13. VT performances

    0-200 km/h 13,7s
    0-1km standing start 22,4s

    <!-- Signature -->
  14. Re: VT performances

    I'll take two please <IMG SRC="http://www.supercarforums.com/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif">

    keep the faith<!-- Signature -->
  15. Re: VT performances

    This car is nice i wish i cud have one like this it looks beter than any viper <IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif"><!-- Signature -->
  16. No Subject

    yo i think your right it does look like an sv
  17. at the wide world of cars in spring valley..it was black n very hot..go to the topic on the new mucielago "i saw one" to hear details n s**t.. ight? peace
  18. Re: i sat in this

    I sit in this car every day if I want - though I know that this car is for poor people only... but I try to be understanding.
    <!-- Signature -->
  19. Re: i sat in this

    This thread smell like bull...<!-- Signature -->
  20. Is that pic of a VT ?..it looks like an SV to me!?? what do u th

    Is that pic of a VT.. it looks like an SV to me!?? what do u think ?
    Its the front..the dark section I thought was the trademark of the SV?
    tell me if im wrong ?<!-- Signature -->
  21. Re: Is that pic of a VT ?..it looks like an SV to me!?? what do

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from Sean</i>
    <b>yes, it is its a SV, looks like a 1996-1998 year one</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->No, you gotta look at the little aspects - very discrete details, such as the vents, rims, etc. Its very evident that the SV and the VT are two totally different cars.<!-- Signature -->
  22. No Subject

    yo i think your right it does look like an sv
  23. #23 bentley, Aug 16, 2002
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
  24. Re: i sat in this

    1 you can't prove thats you in the picture
    2 nobody cares
    3 everyone does this because they're all FAGS

Share This Page