It's a "poor mans" SL?

Discussion in '2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK32 AMG' started by DAN286, Aug 10, 2002.

  1. Face it given the chance u'd much rather have an SL55
     
  2. Re: It's a

    well yeah i like the SL-500 more but this is not a poor mans SL....i don't think a $50k + car is a poor mans sl...more like a car that u want 2 start out with than go up 2 an sl500 or 55. so call it a starters SL
     
  3. Re: It's a

    xactly <IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif"><!-- Signature -->
     
  4. Re: It's a

    yeah sure i like the SL55 10 times more than this one, but the SL is more than twice the price of this one...SO >..
     
  5. Re: It's a

    And the SL is a poor man's SLR raodster <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/smile.gif"></A>
     
  6. Re: It's a "poor man's SL"

    Well...Yes and No. Put it this way.The SLK AMG is a dam good car by all means, just like the SL. But, lets say you crashed this car. Would you rather pay for the damage for an SLK or an SL??? It also depends wether or not your willing to pay 70k for the SLK or 120k for the SL. It all comes down to wether you're a pesimist or an optimist.

    Poor man's SL or wise man's rocket roadster???



     
  7. Re: "Face it u'd rather have an SL given the chance"

    Let me put it this way:

    "Face it, you'd rather pay for and SLK given the chance."

    Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
     
  8. It is a sl for people who like "small cars better than big cars"!!
     

Share This Page