Jota set to replace Murcielago in 2011

Discussion in 'European Cars' started by lucky strike, Apr 8, 2010.

Page 2 of 3
  1. #26 ScoRpFerrari, Apr 8, 2010
    oh you
     
  2. #27 ANP, Apr 8, 2010
    That's just unrivaled perfection, nothing more needs to be said.
     
  3. #28 daisho13, Apr 9, 2010
    Is it just me, or does it have some resemblance to a 512 in profile? I'm sure it will be awesome either way.
     
  4. #29 CMG, Apr 9, 2010
    Jota is a funny name
     
  5. #30 Tipo F130A, Apr 9, 2010
    NOT A PRODUCTION CAR NOT PRODUCTION STYLING IT WILL LOOK DIFFERENT!
     
  6. #31 Atomic2, Apr 9, 2010
    relax member or you will be punished.
     
  7. #32 Tipo F130A, Apr 9, 2010
    I AM #$%#ING FREAKING OUT!!!!!!
     
  8. #33 F50Fanatic, Apr 9, 2010
    Can't wait to hear the engine.
     
  9. #34 Walperstyle, Apr 9, 2010

    The term is 'test mule' a fake body with new goodies underneath.
     
  10. #35 lambosam, Apr 9, 2010
    !
     
  11. #36 WhiteChocolateWorld, Apr 9, 2010
    I beat it bunners rubber
     
  12. #37 numbers, Apr 9, 2010
    I'll bunner a rubber up your arse
     
  13. #38 maserati, Apr 9, 2010
    Good, the 512 is one of the hottest cars ever made.
     
  14. #39 daisho13, Apr 10, 2010
    OKAY. REMEMBER TO TURN YOUR HEARING AID OFF WHEN YOU GO TO BED!
     
  15. #40 andresito51807, Apr 29, 2010
    the jotta how be will????? the motor???? and the body how will be?
     
  16. #41 Phanofmuzik, Apr 29, 2010
    HOW IS BABBY FORMED
     
  17. #42 PandaBeat, Apr 30, 2010
    hablas español?
     
  18. #43 EliseS2, Apr 30, 2010
    Why the <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/disappointed.gif"></A> ? You do know those are two differnt things. It could also just be a typo.
     
  19. #44 Toine, Apr 30, 2010
    Nice avatar btw, that's a series II GTO right? Beautiful car, could you post the fullsize image?
     
  20. #45 Northalius, Apr 30, 2010
    No one would care if you were never interested in cars. You are useless. You are insignificant. You are NOTHING!

    Same goes for Lam#%[email protected] and PandaBeatMeat.

    Corvette beats Lamborghini's ass on the track. Hahahaha!

    ...

    ...

    The End.
     
  21. #46 lambornima, Apr 30, 2010
    lol!
     
  22. #47 LamBoy, Apr 30, 2010
    they also look better!!!






































































    or maybe not
     
  23. #48 Northalius, May 1, 2010
    Lamborghini's always looked better than Corvettes, Ferrari's, Porches, etc. I will not deny that. I speak the honest truth when I post. Many think I'm blinded by bias. Nope. If it's true in my mind, I will admit it.

    Lambo's win hands down in the aesthetics department. Too bad their performance doesn't match their looks, however. <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/sad.gif"></A>

    Cheap Corvettes beating them in performance? Sad day, indeed.
     
  24. #49 LamBoy, May 1, 2010
    because an lp670 is slow? probably most of us would do a better laptime with one instead of a zr1
     
  25. #50 thebarron1989, May 1, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
    their performance does not match their looks?
    lp670- 0-60 in 2.8sec
    quarter mile time 10.9

    lp560- 0-60 in 3.2sec
    quarter mile 11.2sec

    http://www.roadandtrack.com/tests/car/2009-lamborghini-gallardo-lp560-4/page_2_-_road_test-3a_2009_lamborghini_gallardo_lp560-4_page_2

    http://www.roadandtrack.com/tests/car/2010-lamborghini-murcielago-lp670-4-super-veloce/page_2_-_2010_lamborghini_murcielago_lp670-4_super_veloce_page_2

    how many production cars post identical numbers or better?
     
Page 2 of 3

Share This Page