Jota set to replace Murcielago in 2011

Discussion in 'European Cars' started by lucky strike, Apr 8, 2010.

  1. oh you
     
  2. That's just unrivaled perfection, nothing more needs to be said.
     
  3. Is it just me, or does it have some resemblance to a 512 in profile? I'm sure it will be awesome either way.
     
  4. Jota is a funny name
     
  5. NOT A PRODUCTION CAR NOT PRODUCTION STYLING IT WILL LOOK DIFFERENT!
     
  6. relax member or you will be punished.
     
  7. I AM #$%#ING FREAKING OUT!!!!!!
     
  8. Can't wait to hear the engine.
     

  9. The term is 'test mule' a fake body with new goodies underneath.
     
  10. I beat it bunners rubber
     
  11. I'll bunner a rubber up your arse
     
  12. Good, the 512 is one of the hottest cars ever made.
     
  13. OKAY. REMEMBER TO TURN YOUR HEARING AID OFF WHEN YOU GO TO BED!
     
  14. the jotta how be will????? the motor???? and the body how will be?
     
  15. HOW IS BABBY FORMED
     
  16. hablas espaƱol?
     
  17. Why the <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/disappointed.gif"></A> ? You do know those are two differnt things. It could also just be a typo.
     
  18. Nice avatar btw, that's a series II GTO right? Beautiful car, could you post the fullsize image?
     
  19. No one would care if you were never interested in cars. You are useless. You are insignificant. You are NOTHING!

    Same goes for Lam#%[email protected] and PandaBeatMeat.

    Corvette beats Lamborghini's ass on the track. Hahahaha!

    ...

    ...

    The End.
     
  20. lol!
     
  21. they also look better!!!






































































    or maybe not
     
  22. Lamborghini's always looked better than Corvettes, Ferrari's, Porches, etc. I will not deny that. I speak the honest truth when I post. Many think I'm blinded by bias. Nope. If it's true in my mind, I will admit it.

    Lambo's win hands down in the aesthetics department. Too bad their performance doesn't match their looks, however. <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/sad.gif"></A>

    Cheap Corvettes beating them in performance? Sad day, indeed.
     
  23. because an lp670 is slow? probably most of us would do a better laptime with one instead of a zr1
     
  24. #50 thebarron1989, May 1, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
    their performance does not match their looks?
    lp670- 0-60 in 2.8sec
    quarter mile time 10.9

    lp560- 0-60 in 3.2sec
    quarter mile 11.2sec

    http://www.roadandtrack.com/tests/car/2009-lamborghini-gallardo-lp560-4/page_2_-_road_test-3a_2009_lamborghini_gallardo_lp560-4_page_2

    http://www.roadandtrack.com/tests/car/2010-lamborghini-murcielago-lp670-4-super-veloce/page_2_-_2010_lamborghini_murcielago_lp670-4_super_veloce_page_2

    how many production cars post identical numbers or better?
     

Share This Page