Well, here it is... http://www.ferrarifour.com/Start.aspx?lang=en I for one think didn't think it would turn out nearly as well as this.
Nothing z3ish about its performance... 6.2l V12 660 HP, 680 NM, 335km/h, 3.7 0-100 km/h.... Edit: It also has ferrari's 4x4 drivetrain which is supposed to be 50% lighter than a conventional 4wheel drive system.
yeah, i just edited that when you replied <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/tongue.gif"></A>
quite cool <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/smile.gif"></A> not sure about the side view but the rest are gorgeous
Is this for real? Because it looks like some photoshops. edit: so yes it is. It has those same horrible headlights as the F458.
The pictures are off of the official website so yes, its the real deal. The into video is awesome, btw.
<A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/amazed.gif"></A>
I was expecting a sleeker looking car. It has some of the bad parts of the California. The back is interesting though.
and they did so well with the 458. who the hell let the asshole who designed the california near the front of this thing.
why do all the front engined modern Ferraris have to look like smiling gremlins? Its not an attractive design theme. I know old Ferraris had large eggcrate grills, but the execution here is all wrong.
last pretty front engined Ferrari was the 550 (the 575 had to much fiddily crap and the 456 was released before the 550).
Front: Perfect Rear: Nice But it's going to take a while to get used to a Ferrari hatchback. I have a feeling when seeing it IRL it's going to be very cool. Maybe not pretty but relly cool. Maybe even badass (front)
I swear to christ I'm going to carve every stupid thing you say into a bat and pay someone to beat you with it until your idiocy shows up permenently indented in your flesh.