nice car but...

Discussion in '1993 Isdera Commendatore 112i' started by onwheels, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. I think the rear is a little weird looking. I`ve seen it in other pics
     
  2. Re: nice car but...

    It needz a wing on the back
     
  3. Re: nice car but...

    Well I don't think it needs a wing, but i think MORE horse powers!!!
     
  4. Re: nice car but...

    It needs more power. a v12 with 400hp sux!! i saw a toyota supera with v6 and 1038hp!!and the back is ugly
     
  5. Re: nice car but...

    You`re right KDSR34. The rear is ugly.
     
  6. Re: nice car but...

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from Thugz</i>
    <b>It needz a wing on the back</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->
    It has a wing similar to the McLaren F1-it pops up whan the car brakes. But I think it should have one more like a XJ220.
     
  7. Re: nice car but...

    the rear is longer than on any other car coz they use the extra space for downforce, so no need for a wing...<!-- Signature -->
     
  8. Re: nice car but...

    nice car.... but the body is ugly as my ass!!!!! ha ha mmmuusssn
     
  9. Re: nice car but...

    u are stupid. It's a great looking car, a billion times better looking than anything you'll ever own. More powerful too.
     
  10. Re: nice car but...

    It looks better than any Chevy,lol.
     
  11. Re: nice car but...

    You're #$%#ing stupid you twat,this car is beautiful,the only thing I would change on it is,the damn rearveiw mirror on top of the car and add some proper side rear view mirrors,lolOther then that this car looks damn good,way better then anything you'll ever own loser,lol.
     
  12. Re: nice car but...

    Yeah right!
    Very nice car and iz made in Germany!!!!Well done!!!
     
  13. Re: nice car but...

    wierd
     
  14. Re: nice car but...

    I love the design of this car. I think that the paroscope on the roof is a bit over the top, but that can be fixed...
     
  15. Re: nice car but...

    it needs nothing...the problem is the price, it is expensive <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/sad.gif"></A>
     
  16. Re: nice car but...

    All cars have flaws... I like the back, but I hate the pariscope!
     
  17. Re: nice car but...

    i think having enough hp to go 212mph and 0-60 in 4.2 seconds is enough even if, in some magical world that blah blah blah(u get the point), 2hp is enough then thats fine with me.
     
  18. Re: nice car but...

    but what it looks awsome and it's got the power to back it up.
     
  19. Re: nice car but...

    TOYOTA SUPRA THIS TOYOTA SUPRA THAT! FU.CK TOYOTA SUPRAS THEY SUCK THATS WHY THEY NEED TURBO MODS AND SUCH. EVERYONE TALKS HOW BAD THEY ARE 'MY 1200HP SUPRA CAN KICK YOU AZZ'. I BET YOU TAKE ALL THE MODS FROM A SUPRA AND PUT THEM UP AGAINST REAL CARS LIKE LAMBORGHINIS FERRARIS MCLREAN F1 YOU WOULD SEE A TOYOTA SUPRA IS NOT SO BADDASS AFTER ALL. PLUS SUPRAS ARE UGLY TO THEY SOUND LIKE LAWNMORE WHEN PLAYD WITH. YOU TUNNER GUYS DONT KNOW WHAT THE HELL PERFORMANCE IS. ALL YOU KNOW IS LETS PUT SOME TURBO IN IT. A CAR LIKE THIS ONE IS WORTH EVERY PENNY BECAUSE IN 20 OR SO YEARS PEOPLE WILL KNOW WHAT A LAMBORGHINI IS AND WHAT A FERRARI IS PEOPLE WONT KNOW WHAT A 1200HP SUPRA IS BECAUSE THIS IS JUST A FAD RIGHT NOW. VIPER=SUPRA KILLER
    VIPER=SUPRA KILLER VIPER=SUPRA KILLER........................................... GO AHEAD PUT SOME TURBO IN YOUR SUPRA TRY AND MESS WITH A VIPER YOU CAN MESS WITH THIS ONE. MADE BUY HENNSEY 1000TT PURE MECHANICAL AGGRESSION IM TALKIN CURRENT WORLD RECORD HOLDER HERE NOT SOME LAWNMORE THAT THINK THAT THEY CAN HOOK UP SUPRAS AND RACE BONE STOCK FERRARIS. 8>[email protected] 1501/4 THERE NO SUPRA OUT THERE THAT FAST 0 TO 60 2.2 SEC AND A TOP SPEED OF 245MPH AND GOING FOR 149,500.GO ON CHECK THEM OUT AT HENNESSEYPERFORMANCE.COM IN THINK ITS A BETTER DEAL THEN TRYING TO MAKE SOME THATS NOT FAST IN A SO CALLED SUPERCAR. SUPRA WITH MORE THAN 1200HP COST MORE THAN A NEW FERRARI 360 MODENA AND YOU BUILD IT MEANING UPGRADING THE HOLE SYSTEM. THIS CAR OTHER HAND STILL WILL OUT RUN A SUPRA WITH 1000HP. ON THE TRACK SUPRA CANT TURN WELL THEY ARE DRAG CARS MEANING THEY ANIT SHIT AT THE TRACK YOU CANT BEAT A FERRARI 360 AFTER ALL IN YOUR SUPRA. BECAUSE HE WILL CORNNER BETTER THAN THAT BOAT OF YOURS.
     
  20. Re: nice car but...

    really like the car but don't you think the front looks like a 911 GT1?
     
  21. Re: nice car but...

    If I'm not mistaken the Hennessy Venom 1000TT (oh there it is!!!) 1000TT = AFTERMARKET TWIN TURBO.
    And if you want to talk about the Viper and Supra from an engineering standpoint the supra is a far superior vehicle.

    Supra is 3.0 liters + Twin Turbos = 1200HP
    Viper is 8.0 liters + Twin Turbos = 1000HP
    Is something wrong here? Shouldn't that Viper be making about 700-750HP in stock form? The Japs can get 100HP per liter easy, what's Chryslers problem... oh yeah, THEY CAN'T BUILD AN ENGINE FOR SHIT!!!

    Read a little bit of history about the Viper before mouthing off about how good of a car it is, and then maybe you'll find out that Chrysler couldn't even figure out how to make a V-10 so they asked Lamborghini to design the crankshaft.

    Hmmm, if I recall correctly, Porsche had an experimental V-10 in 1938, ya that's right 1938. So what's Chryslers problem that they still can't figure it out 50 years later?
    By the way, that 2.2sec 0-60 for the 1000TT was on slicks, 3 months later Lingenfelter built a C5 that had about 850-900hp and they pulled 1.98 0-60, so again I ask, what's Chryslers problem?
     
  22. Re: nice car but...

    I went on their website and they seem like they're all about new technologies and the like, so what I'm wondering is why can't they use the same cameras as Formula 1 does on the helmets... just put those in a spot on the car with good blindspot views and link em' to lcd screens inside the car.

    HEY LOOK MA' NO WIND DRAG FROM SOME GOOFY LOOKING MIRROR ON THE ROOF!
     
  23. Re: nice car but...

    need for speed II se
     
  24. It's very nice and powerful supercar!
    Definitelly one of the best of 90s!
     
  25. Very nice car. If someone even dares to compare this with a supra then hes a real dork.
     

Share This Page