NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

Discussion in '2002 Honda NSX Coupe' started by Chii, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    You should say in the aluminum.<IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif"><!-- Signature -->
     
  2. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    Honda 2005 wil be just like Kia, Daewoo and skoda, they really are leting them selves down. the sprocket concept looked promising but then they made the Unibox and now this! they should kill the NSX now or at least make it good with a good engine. i hardly use the word supercar to describe it.

    I bet i could do a better Honda Supercar.<!-- Signature -->
     
  3. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    Why?
    Honda is just thinking abit more to the future, unlike the American companies.<!-- Signature -->
     
  4. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from Chii</i>
    <b>Why?
    Honda is just thinking abit more to the future, unlike the American companies.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    I totally agree with Chili. American car companies are just bringing back cars from the past like the T-Brid and making them gay. Atleast import car companies have new and fresh ideas. And also this car isnt ugly. I actually like it. An ugly car is that Ford 49 concept, that thing has to be the size of an aircraft carrier.
     
  5. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    It looks like the last generation NSX, only the headlights are altered(they remind me of the new Camry.) But, it is a little bit more powerful than its predocessor.
     
  6. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    they changed only the the front and that's the uglyest part on this new nsx... too bad!
     
  7. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    don't you think honda is kind of copying ferrari? as regarding to the changes. ferrari did almost the same thing for the 512 series...from TR to M...only the head light changed too. and in fact, the head light looks pretty simular to the ferrari's too...

     
  8. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from BMWMPower1</i>
    <b><!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from Chii</i>
    <b>Why?
    Honda is just thinking abit more to the future, unlike the American companies.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    I totally agree with Chili. American car companies are just bringing back cars from the past like the T-Brid and making them gay. Atleast import car companies have new and fresh ideas. And also this car isnt ugly. I actually like it. An ugly car is that Ford 49 concept, that thing has to be the size of an aircraft carrier.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->you think the 49 and the t-bird are ugly? have you seen sum of the honda concepts? like the unibox wtf? or the bulldog or how about the or the dualnote thats a box on wheels the reason that the american companies are bring back the old models be becuz they sold so well and we like the way they looked as with the new t-bird you do see the resembalance and also with the PT its not that we dont have new ideals if you look the cars are redesigned its just we liked the old ones so much were bring them back for another round and how about pontiac they made the vibe they must be doing sumthing right if toyota is using the same thing under the name of matrix? <!-- Signature -->
     
  9. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    it looksless expensive....less like a supercar...its still nice and all and u dont notice what it looks like when i drivin it, but whatever appeals to honda i guess...<!-- Signature -->
     
  10. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    yes, the 49 and t-bird are gly...damn ugly. Actually,two of the ugliest cars i've seen. Comming from a ford fan that must say something. When the new WRX came out it was a similar move as this NSX. Everyone thought it was dead ugly, including me. Similar are he AU falcons over here in australia. After adjusting to the modern designs of these cars, i have actually come to like both shapes very much. I think once ppl see more of this NSX shape, they will coime to love it as much, or more as the previous one. And there is a good reason why they didnt change it much. Ever heard of
    "if it aint broke dont fix it"?
    I see an NSX every week parked at the local harvey norman shopping centre, and everytime i see it i think "what a beautiful car". These things look great in the metal.
     
  11. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    I couldn't be less impressed with this. I like the NSX, but it just doesn't seem to compare anymore. I'd still love one, but this new one doesn't really offer anything new, does it?<!-- Signature -->
     
  12. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    The Viper guy is right. It always was uggly and they made it worse!<!-- Signature -->
     
  13. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    I think the best model of the Honda NSX is probably the NSX-R model otherwise they r rubbish. NISSAN SKYLINE GTR V-SPEC WOULD RIP IT APART!!
     
  14. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    If you really look at the design, there is more than just some changed headlights. I am not saying that this car is nice looking because it is not. But there is a big backwards scoop that drains out from the front. I can definitely see this car being very aero dynamic. It really needs some more power, but you ahve to see, it is Honda. Honda can't make fast cars. But I did hear that Honda is coming out with a new NSX concept that will be a V8 with over 500hp! That is pretty sick, but it won't hit until like 2005. I think this car had its day in 93-95, but not anymore. They need a serious body change and a much more powerful engine. No wonder this POS doesn't sell.
     
  15. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    Hey Audi_guy!

    Honda's CAN in fact make fast cars. By looking at different classes, you can pick out a Honda that is considered fast (very fast) compared with others with similar specs. And if you want to just look at plain straight out fast, then look at the Jordan, and British American Racing teams F1 cars. They both use Honda engines.

    And yes (to everyone), eventhough Honda does make lawnmower engines, they aren't that stupid to be using them in their cars.
     
  16. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    yeah, i have to agree, the 2002 NSX isnt the prettiest thing ive seen outta the Honda shop, but...this is only to tide us over until the 2004 NSX makes its debut in a year or so, it will have a 4liter I-VTEC V8. it also looks very similar to a ferarri or lamborghini.
    just wait boys, the best is yet to come.
     
  17. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    NISSAN SKYLINE GTR V-SPEC definetion- BULLSHIT........ a car with a 4Wd system with an engine of 276...... can't beat a RWD NSX with the same power rating...... The skyline is doing 0- 60 in 5.4 seconds whit 4WD...... but the RWD NSX is doing 0- 60 in 4.7...... almost a whole second shoter...... just face the facts the Nissan ( Piss an) skyline is a peice of crap... it can beat it on a short run neither a long run...... OH did i mention the NSX is the fastest production car out of japan...... get straight......... so your facts can be straight.

    hondamanfromhondaland
     
  18. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    Round a track, rather than the much quoted and obviously all important American straight line test, the Skyline would crush the NSX, particularly if both engines were given the free reign after market retro-fitting allows - the Skyline can be tuned to 1000BHP and more.<!-- Signature -->
     
  19. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    Hmmmm..Yes..The R34 is king of handling around tracks as proven around the world..

    But I have to agree, this is the best looking NSX Yet..but still looks like a Lotus ESPRIT!! ARRRGH!! Nothing wrong with the Esprit..one of my favourite cars to drive =P
    Integrated lights are a nice touch..they made it more aerodynamic, but we need the HP!! 290 is simply not enough!!
    400+ would be nice.

    Also..a lil more sound deadening material like the IS300 would be nice..you can go deaf in this car if you ever driven. Also a little more consideration be taken into better suspension so lil tar strips on da road dun feel like damned potholes!!
    Those are basically my 2 main technical complaints besides HP.
    But I do hope they do a redesign =)

    DA PUN

    <!-- Signature -->
     
  20. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    THE HONDA NSX HANDLES LIEK A DOG SO THE SKYLINE WINS IN HANDLING!!
     
  21. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    nothing changed what a joke. Just got real ugly. Honda sucks and so does Nissan. GM , Dodge is were all the power is.
     
  22. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    Well... Honda stylists never could do anything with the midengine layout not then and not now (In terms of styling anyways). This design was passable in 94 but not now. I can't see many of these being sold. All and all id say its a fales.
     
  23. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    Well remember, Honda is based on practicality over style.
    This car is made as practical as they could =P

    DA PUN<!-- Signature -->
     
  24. Re: NO DIFFERENCE,IN FACT ITS MORE UGLY!!

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from fenix4116 </i>
    <b>you think the 49 and the t-bird are ugly? have you seen sum of the honda concepts? like the unibox wtf? or the bulldog or how about the or the dualnote thats a box on wheels the reason that the american companies are bring back the old models be becuz they sold so well and we like the way they looked as with the new t-bird you do see the resembalance and also with the PT its not that we dont have new ideals if you look the cars are redesigned its just we liked the old ones so much were bring them back for another round and how about pontiac they made the vibe they must be doing sumthing right if toyota is using the same thing under the name of matrix?BR>
    </b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    Concepts aren't always made to be sold. They are made to prove a point also or just so see if something can be done. The Unibox wasn't made to be sold. Also you calling the Dualnote a box on wheels shows you haven't looked at it. The UniBOX is a box on wheel. The dualnote is a hybrid car that has more power than a lot of v8 cars.. so it also get's good gas milelage which is a good thing since gas will never be at prices like it was 10 years ago. More and more laws for emissions are coming out so by having a hybrid like that they already have the technology to have a very clean and fuel efficient car with lots of horsepower when new laws are put in place that are much much tought than the ones japan has today. These may one day get to the US too. Cali already has tough laws just wait for the rest of the US to catch up.
     

Share This Page