Re: Overrated Yes, it "must" be Honda insiders. Considering a HONDA PUBLICATION said exactly what I said earlier, and numerous REPUTABLE sources said something much different from what you just claimed, I'm inclined to believe them. LOL, you should probably stop referring to Wheels, I'm beginning to get the impression they're much like Muscle Mustangs Fast Fords magazine: incredibly misinformed, heavily opinionated, very biased, and little information based on actual fact. I mean, first they get suspiciously SLOW acceleration times from an STi while another Australian (who ACTUALLY happens to have their articles available online) publication had no trouble whatsoever getting closer-to-reality figures out of the STi, while getting the same acceleration out of the HSV. THEN they produce an article on the NSX (of which they apparently make up every bit of knowledge they have), with extremely inaccurate production plan figures (the NSX was intended to be exclusive, 6000 is hardly exclusive), with 100% sold, it's hardly "negligible sales" so I dunno what they were sniffing when they wrote that, and considering it decimated EVERY car in its class when it first came out (leaving Ferrari scrambling to come up with something that could compare), and has had a fair turnout in LeMans, and has had countless other victories, it HARDLY had no impact other than "faultless reliability and good fuel economy", so again. I guess then that according to "Wheels" any supercar worthy of the title, must perform like the Dauer 962 LeMans. LOL, they seem VERY untrustworthy. "Honda insiders must be bullshit artists then........" No, Wheels magazine must be bullshit artists when they say that "Honda executives said so". "The Gt2 is a version of the 911, therefore the 911 beats the Nsx." Fair enough, but you're forgetting ONE thing: THE GT2 IS IN A DIFFERENT CLASS!!!!!! Gawd, do you have ANY sense of reality?