Palestinian islamists burn christian buildings

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by lizardmech, Sep 11, 2006.

  1. You're never going to be a mod.
  2. Crap, so I was right about you not being dead. <A BORDER="0" HREF=""><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/sad.gif"></A>
  3. Enjoy it. How does it feel? Since you're wrong 90% of the time.
  4. Meh, maybe I'll get lucky and two meteorites will fall from the sky: one on you and one on the Ferrari factory.
  5. Such unmitigated hatred.

    For shame.
  6. <A BORDER="0" HREF=""><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/disappointed.gif"></A>
  7. !!!

    Check your PMs!
  8. Prey, pray or wahtever for it. I'm feeling lucky.
  9. Was that a joke, or were you being serious?
  10. Their Formula One factory, of course.
  11. I'll see you in hell.
  12. That entire notion makes no sense at all.
  13. thats cuz u retarded
  14. This would constitute an ad hominem argument. See, I don't care about his sexuality. We were having a discussion about religion, god, and the nature of the universe. Not if he digs dudes. Don't care if he digs dudes. Not even an issue. So what you're bringing up is entirely meaningless, perhaps even more so than the crap you've posted for the last couple of pages - but that would be quite a stretch now, wouldn't it. You've threatened him, now you're getting personal. Keyboard commandos the world over would be proud.

    You are terrible at arguing, could suggest some literature if you'd like to improve...
  15. pretty much
  16. I'm liking you more and more with each post. <A BORDER="0" HREF=""><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/smile.gif"></A>
  17. Same here!

    It's just so rare to find a mature member here on (unfortunately).
  18. You've missed the point:

    "Conflict of interest".

    Leviticus 20:13

    You also failed to notice that I said "I'd Like to" not "I'm going to" when referencing removing teeth from mouth.

    The latter would constitute threatening, the prior is simply an inward reflection that I "Posted out loud"

    In summary, this is not an arguement, there is nothing to argue here, all my posts have been personal beliefs on the subject and simply my opinion, arguements are based on facts, opinions are formed by the individual who may have interpreted facts or may not have them at all. You're welcome to be taken aback by my attitute, but to imply that "I cannot argue" is not relevant in this thread.
  19. You are such a stupid dumb#$%#. Seriously stop being a jackass.
  20. Very good! You've made so much progress, maybe we can continue this so that you'll become a productive forum member in the near future. Anyway, back to business.

    Mark 16:16 - He who believeth and is baptized shall be saved, but he that believeth not shall be damned.

    Conflict of interest? Not if salvation is by faith and faith alone. Christianity builds in some room for error - they know that humans are frail and weak and not able to follow the tenets at all times. People argue the Jewish laws in the old testament as being black and white often forgetting that the only black and white issue in the Christian faith is do you believe or not. Everything else is gray, so he's still able to argue from a logical position. And even that is besides the point - this constitutes a straw man argument. His sexuality has not a damn thing to do with whether or not God exists, nor the level of his Christianity. You're arguing something completely different.

    Threat or not, you continually use aggression to try to get your point across. Calling him a dumbfvck and telling him to shut the fvck up don't help your case. Minor discrepancy between 'I'd like to' and 'I'm going to' - either way, it constitutes the argumentum ad baculum (appeal to force), thus discrediting your case even further.

    Your arguments are still weak at best, but making improvements. And don't argue your opinions unless you have empirical evidence to back it up. Everyone has an opinion, so logically you fail if we're supposed to believe it just because you do.

    I appreciate your civility, sarcastic or not. Way to make progress.
  21. #171 bucknutz, Sep 13, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
    See my previous post. This is incredibly easy to explain and I honestly don't know what it is that you disagree with.

    "If you're a Christian and you love god, accept Jesus, ask for forgiveness, and whatever else, you go to heaven. If you don't love god, accept Jesus, ask for forgiveness, and everything else, you go to hell. You've said the same thing to us a thousand times. So like he said, you either love god, or 'the alternative is dire.' What exactly do you disagree with there?"
  22. ahh, the joys of a six page thread...posts get longer, more comprehensive and violent.
  23. No idea what you're talking about.

Share This Page