Re: 2003 SVT Cobra vs. The BMW M3

Discussion in '2003 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra' started by Cobra Man, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. No, you're a lower class moron, that doesn't work because your still in grade school. And you don't live in a trailer park because that would be to "high class" for you.
    The truth is you're just some ignorant kid who has mommy drive him around in a 1980 rusted out bmw thinking that he's the sh!t. You have no understanding of cars, and you're stupidity and moronic views when it comes to American cars is so horrrible its almost funny.
    Lets do a quick comparision. The mustang svt cobra vs the BMW M3 SMG. The mustang does 0-60 in 4.69 seconds, the quarter mile in 12.84, and is priced around$34,000. The M3 does 0-60 in5.04 seconds, the quarter mile in 13.35 seconds, and is priced at $55,000. Hmmm...for $21,000 you would think that the M3 should be faster, but its not. Sad. And please don't say that the mustang can't handle, because truth is it will probably spank the M3 around a track.
  2. Oh sorry, I should have known that my comment would offend you since it hits so close to home for you. I'm not even going to comment on the price of the M3 compared to the Mustang, because people are willing to pay for the M3. I wonder if this Mustang has less horse power advertised like the last SVT Mustang.

  3. actually it has more then advertised
  4. Where did I say that the Speed 12 was in your Avatar? I said the Speed 12 is TVR's flagship and it's nothing but a big muscle car from Europe! I never said you didn't say Vipers are great cars for their money, I said find me a car under 100grand that's as good as the Viper as far as performance specs go.
    So what if i quoted you from another thread, I didnt' feel like responding to two ingorant remarks, so I'd kill two birds with one stone, deal with it!
    However, you can own an M3 all you want, but I'm just proving you wrong on everything you said about American Muscle such as the 03' Cobra. Your ideas are all based off of opinion, not fact.
    I on the other hand proved you wrong with facts therefor you have been OWNED! Deal with it!
  5. What did I say about that 03' Cobra? The TVR Tuscan Speed Six is faster than the Viper for less, there you go.

  6. Well, sorry, but again you're an idiot and don't know what you are talking about. The 2003 svt mustang cobra has around 425hp, much more than what it is advertised at.
    People are willing to pay for the M3...well people are willing to pay for the 2003 svt cobra...people are willing to pay $71,000 for the second to last camaro off the assembly line...people will pay for anything that they want, and will pay as much as they want to get it. It doesn't mean something is better just because it sells.
    So please next time you're trying to type something intelligent while you're in your trailer, at least try to sound smart. We know that you are not, but come on, try.
  7. No. I have seen dyno sheets. if i remember right 391 HP
  8. No it's not! The TVR is not faster than the Viper and it's not less. So what the **** are you talking about?
  9. He's talking out his ass. Now that you have proved him wrong he will say something like "well I never said the tvr is faster than the viper", even though all you have to do is read acouple of post up to see that he said it. He is a moron I Hate Rustangs.
  10. ANGISO, it's almost admirable how you use other peoples posts. So as to answer them and just pretend that you never saw mine, so you don't respond. But in a way I take it as a compliment. But again everyone, this guy is a troll.
  11. 0-60 in under 4, promised top speed of 180 mph, and its very light, so it brakes fast and turns well, even better than the viper.

  12. You said that the M3 should be better because its more expensive, except when you buy BMW, you buy a name, unlike ford, which is garbage.

  13. No, I won't say that.

  14. What post are you talking about?

  15. If ford is "garbage" how can they produce a $35,000 vehicle that can spank a $55,000 car? All you are getting for the extra $21,000 is the name You prove your lack of knowledge and understanding of vehicles with every post you make moron.
  16. Just how much under 4 second? A million dollar Mclarren with a 600 horse BMW V-12 does it in under 4 also. So how much under 4. Like 3.9? And even so, the Viper isn't THAT much slower. It does 0-60 in 4.1, not what we call sluggish. And thats Motor Trend. And I dont quite understand. Your saying that because it's light, it must brake and handle better than the Viper? Sounds like a firm conclusion. And you didn't address the cost issue so, we can continue to assume that the Viper is still cheaper. When they drove it in their test they seem to think the Viper handles excellent, and is more than capable than achieving 180 mph, what with it's 6-speed and 500 ft/lbs of torque and all.
  17. The Viper is a 200mph car, and the Speed 6 does 0-60 in mid 4's so don't lie, your confusing that with the speed 12. And like I said the speed 6 isn't under 100,000 grand in the US. I may be close to 50k in England but isn't and never will be available in the US and if you could get one here it would cost you well over 100k. So what were you saying? The Viper is faster than the Speed 6 in every category, do some research before you respond ever again.
  18. He's wrong WhiteGT, the Speed 6 does 0-60 in about 4.6 seconds. And it'll cost over 100k just to get one in the States. John travolta is the only person I can think of that has one. He's full of crap the TVR Speed 12 does 0-60 in under 4 there's no way the Speed 6 is just as fast.
  19. Yea, he's just messing around. I think we're all just posting for fun by now. We'll post a bunch of hard facts. He'll respond (if he does) with something like "I didn't say that", "Learn how to type correctly", just to put it off longer in hopes that our hard facts against his false facts will be quickly forgotten. Then we will waste our time responding with more facts, and copying quotes of his to prove he said what he did, and he'll respond with more false facts and something to help completly disregard all of our responses to him, yet again, like, "To have this car I must live in a trailer park." The guys a tool, and I really think he's joking.
  20. well as far as joking goes I think he got proved wrong and put himself in a corner, and now he's too hard headed to admit he's wrong. I'm still waiting for him to find me a European Car that can out-do the Viper for under 100k <A BORDER="0" HREF=""><IMG BORDER="0" SRC=""></A>
  21. I was wondering who the first person was gonna be to figure out that I wasn't even being serious. I quit arguing seriously a long time ago. Oh by the way, I have seen the TVR Speed Six do 0-60 in under 4 seconds, and it is cheaper than the Viper. But it is probably the only European car that would be a competetor for under $100k.

  22. First of all you haven't see anything. If you saw a Speed six do 0-60 in under four it was not factory. Either that or your confusing it with the Speed 12. Second of all, the TVR is not available in the US and if you were to get it here it would cost over 100 grand. I've already pointed all this stuff out earlier. I'm just not going to let you win here. And don't pretend like you were kidding because if you were you wouldn't be responding the way you are.
  23. Yeah, you could be right about the Speed Six, I'll have to find that source again. Until then though I'm going to have to concede that you're right. Don't be so ignorant, it costs under $100k American, just because you can't get it to the United States for that doesn't mean thats what it costs. You can't get the Viper in the UK for less than like $150K, but is that what it costs? No. Thats just classic American statement right there, classic ethnocentrism, the USA isn't the end all be all.

  24. Even if it were available in the US it would still be over 100k becuase of Demand. You can convert UK cash to US cash all you want but a Speed 6 would not cost 50k in the US if it were available. Calling me ignorant shows you don't know much of the US as you think.

Share This Page