Re: BULLCRAP QUARTER MILE

Discussion in '2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S' started by locoako786, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from Killer</i>
    <b>O-60 IN 3.4 AND THE QUARTER MILE IN 10 SECONDS???
    MAKES ME LAFF. BULL
    MCLAREN F1 DOES 60 IN 3.2 , AND QUARTER MILE IS 11.6 SECONDS!
    BASICALLY THIS IS BULLSHIT.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    umm that means mclaren is better and this probably can get more top speed when its in motion
     
  2. the ameritech F1 is "american"<!-- Signature -->
     
  3. Unlike the Jap cars these cars are built of top speed, not acceleration. So the Quarter mile won't be as fast as a Modifided CIvic but will kick its' ass in top speed. <!-- Signature -->
     
  4. uve got to be kidding, u reckon a modified Civic will beat this in the 1/4, what u been smoking???

    this thing will run high 10s for sure (btw a McLaren will run 11 flat, not just 11.6)

    remember this car is both lighter and more powerful than the McLaren, not to mention a lot more torque
     
  5. You're right, It's probably faster, They are known for deflating numbers at Koenigsegg,the car lives in the top end, so it's feasable. My friend, 0-60 doesn't always tell the tale
     
  6. I'm sick of all these people who just cant face the facts! I'M SORRY TO SAY THIS, BUT THERE ARE BETTER CARS THAN A McLAREN F1, yes I know it's sad, but its the truth so dont go BSing everything that's better than a Mclaren.<!-- Signature -->
     
  7. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from Killer</i>
    <b>O-60 IN 3.4 AND THE QUARTER MILE IN 10 SECONDS???
    MAKES ME LAFF. BULL
    MCLAREN F1 DOES 60 IN 3.2 , AND QUARTER MILE IS 11.6 SECONDS!
    BASICALLY THIS IS BULLSHIT.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    First of all Sc.net is WRONG about the 0-60 time of this car as it does it 3.2 seconds not 3.4, and second of all the CC has a higher top speed than the F1 at 390 km/hour and it has more torque giving it a faster quarter mile time. I'm sorry if your sore that the CC can kill the F1 in performance at a third the price but that's life. If you don't like it, whine to yourself and don't wet your diaper online.<!-- Signature -->
     
  8. Its all about the torque baby<!-- Signature -->
     
  9. Probably better than your crappy car's. why don't you go check on a railroad track with a train coming.<!-- Signature -->
     
  10. People, look at the G this is pulling. 1.14? that is a ton of thrust. I believe it can do 10 sec.<!-- Signature -->
     
  11. hrmm bull crap quater mile? well if u want to get technical, if u can get 400hp into a light weight car u can do flat 10 quater miles and this sucker has a little bit more then 400hp and isnt all that heavy so u work it out<!-- Signature -->
     
  12. doesn't this beast pull more than a g when accelerating? That's gotta account for something when it comes to a 1/4 time. And where are all these numbers coming from? Last I read (Evo # 42) this car has not been officially tested, just rated/estimated based on math
     
  13. Re: Good car

    This car is great, It is very pausible to have a 10s 1.4 mile and a 3.2 second 0-60. The car has a lot of wheelspin in the initial start, there is a traction problem. But once the car gets going quickly, it has better traction and can accelerate quicker
     
  14. "This car is great, It is very pausible to have a 10s 1.4 mile and a 3.2 second 0-60. The car has a lot of wheelspin in the initial start, there is a traction problem. But once the car gets going quickly, it has better traction and can accelerate quicker "

    actually i have seen a test result someone has posted on this forum, you may have seen it. anyway it states 0-100 in like 4 flat and 0-160 in 8 seconds. personally i would love it if the car was faster than the mclaren but looks like its only gonna be top speed wise.<!-- Signature -->
     
  15. i dont know how you americans will take this but, i think this car is faster than your precious McLaren F1 and your much overdesired Mustangs... yeah well....never mind eh.... Shit happens.

    Koenigsegg CC Rules!!!!!!!!!<!-- Signature -->
     
  16. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from ConnaGT1</i>
    <b>i dont know how you americans will take this but, i think this car is faster than your precious McLaren F1 and your much overdesired Mustangs... yeah well....never mind eh.... Shit happens.

    Koenigsegg CC Rules!!!!!!!!!</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    One small problem, the F1 is made in England. It is definitely NOT American!
     
  17. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from ConnaGT1</i>
    <b>i dont know how you americans will take this but, i think this car is faster than your precious McLaren F1 and your much overdesired Mustangs... yeah well....never mind eh.... Shit happens.

    Koenigsegg CC Rules!!!!!!!!!</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    Here we go again. Bash on Americans. What do us Americans care about the McLaren F1? We didn't make it. I'm guessing you're Canadian eh? Just because a car isn't American it doesn't mean that I'm not going to like it. I like McLarens, Buggati's, Ferrari's etc... even though they aren't American. I don't see what you have against Mustangs. I'm sure you hate Corvettes and Vipers as well. I don't understand what all this international war crap on this site is all about. O my god! it's American, i'd better bash it with insults! Give me a break. It gets old. It's not like we're comming in here and saying "A Mustang can waste this." We don't because they aren't in the same class. Mustangs, Corvettes, Vipers are all low cost, high performance, high production sports cars. They aren't exotics. America isn't big on the exotic buisness. All I can think of off the top of my head is the Saleen S7. I hope you learned something. Sorry for all you people who don't want to hear this but sometimes it just gets to me and I have to say something. I'm not looking for a verbal fight or anything.
     
  18. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from ConnaGT1</i>
    <b>i dont know how you americans will take this but, i think this car is faster than your precious McLaren F1 and your much overdesired Mustangs... yeah well....never mind eh.... Shit happens.

    Koenigsegg CC Rules!!!!!!!!!</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE --


    Here we go again. Bash on Americans. What do us Americans care about the McLaren F1? We didn't make it. I'm guessing you're Canadian eh? Just because a car isn't American it doesn't mean that I'm not going to like it. I like McLarens, Buggati's, Ferrari's etc... even though they aren't American. I don't see what you have against Mustangs. I'm sure you hate Corvettes and Vipers as well. I don't understand what all this international war crap on this site is all about. O my god! it's American, i'd better bash it with insults! Give me a break. It gets old. It's not like we're comming in here and saying "A Mustang can waste this." We don't because they aren't in the same class. Mustangs, Corvettes, Vipers are all low cost, high performance, high production sports cars. They aren't exotics. America isn't big on the exotic buisness. All I can think of off the top of my head is the Saleen S7. I hope you learned something. Sorry for all you people who don't want to hear this but sometimes it just gets to me and I have to say something. I'm not looking for a verbal fight or anything.<!-- Signature -->
     
  19. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from ConnaGT1</i>
    <b>i dont know how you americans will take this but, i think this car is faster than your precious McLaren F1 and your much overdesired Mustangs... yeah well....never mind eh.... Shit happens.

    Koenigsegg CC Rules!!!!!!!!!</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    Here we go again. Bash on Americans. What do us Americans care about the McLaren F1? We didn't make it. I'm guessing you're Canadian eh? Just because a car isn't American it doesn't mean that I'm not going to like it. I like McLarens, Buggati's, Ferrari's etc... even though they aren't American. I don't see what you have against Mustangs. I'm sure you hate Corvettes and Vipers as well. I don't understand what all this international war crap on this site is all about. O my god! it's American, i'd better bash it with insults! Give me a break. It gets old. It's not like we're comming in here and saying "A Mustang can waste this." We don't because they aren't in the same class. Mustangs, Corvettes, Vipers are all low cost, high performance, high production sports cars. They aren't exotics. America isn't big on the exotic buisness. All I can think of off the top of my head is the Saleen S7. I hope you learned something. Sorry for all you people who don't want to hear this but sometimes it just gets to me and I have to say something. I'm not looking for a verbal fight or anything.<!-- Signature -->
     
  20. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from 50year old Vette</i>
    <b><!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from ConnaGT1</i>
    <b>i dont know how you americans will take this but, i think this car is faster than your precious McLaren F1 and your much overdesired Mustangs... yeah well....never mind eh.... Shit happens.

    Koenigsegg CC Rules!!!!!!!!!</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    Here we go again. Bash on Americans. What do us Americans care about the McLaren F1? We didn't make it. I'm guessing you're Canadian eh? Just because a car isn't American it doesn't mean that I'm not going to like it. I like McLarens, Buggati's, Ferrari's etc... even though they aren't American. I don't see what you have against Mustangs. I'm sure you hate Corvettes and Vipers as well. I don't understand what all this international war crap on this site is all about. O my god! it's American, i'd better bash it with insults! Give me a break. It gets old. It's not like we're comming in here and saying "A Mustang can waste this." We don't because they aren't in the same class. Mustangs, Corvettes, Vipers are all low cost, high performance, high production sports cars. They aren't exotics. America isn't big on the exotic buisness. All I can think of off the top of my head is the Saleen S7. I hope you learned something. Sorry for all you people who don't want to hear this but sometimes it just gets to me and I have to say something. I'm not looking for a verbal fight or anything.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->


    not u personalyy but i hacve seen many and i mean many americans trying to put the point their vipers and vettes are better thann ferrari, lambo and ect...<!-- Signature -->
     
  21. Take the 2000 mustang Boss. Go look at it's stats. 0-60 in 1.97 seconds, that would kill this car!
     
  22. Yeah quarter mile times. But the Boss' broke ass literally broke! <IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif"> Besides it doesn't look anywhere near as sexy as this car! f uck the Boss when it comes down to it, it's still a ruststang, and I Hate RustStangs!<!-- Signature -->
     
  23. MENTIONING THAT PIECE OF SHIT NAME IN THE KOENIGSEGG FORUM SHOULD BE A MORTAL SIN.


    Rustang VS Koenigsegg. Looks like rustang burgers for supper.<!-- Signature -->
     
  24. on the koenigsegg website it shows the performance figures from car and driver got when they tested last years models so the 3.2 0-60 is true the 1.15 gs it pulls is right and the 10 second 1/4 mile time is completely true
    so boo ya! id either want this or the f60 or the bugatti
     
  25. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from SSfearSS</i>
    <b>People, look at the G this is pulling. 1.14? that is a ton of thrust. I believe it can do 10 sec.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    hahaha, you ppl give me something to chuckle at sometimes, you really do! those "g's" you speak of have nothing to do with thrust or acceleration! those are LATERAL g-forces! aka, the force you feel "pushing" you to the side as you skreetch your tires around a skidpad, not when putting the pedal to the metal! LOL yeah, i think it can do the 1320 in the 10's, but those 1.14g's have nothing to do with it!<!-- Signature -->
     

Share This Page