Re: C 32 AMG???? NAAAAA

Discussion in '2001 Mercedes-Benz C32 AMG' started by 300CE24_RULE, Aug 10, 2002.

  1. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from 300CE24_RULE</i>
    <b>4.4 ??? hahaha

    And why not 4.0 or 3.8 ???

    it's more like 4.8 to 5.0 .</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->what r u talkin about 4.0 or 3.8?
     
  2. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from Emdec55</i>
    <b>MBUSA has 4.9 sec but it can do it in 4.6 sec i only had the 4.4 if its just right for the car..but the 0 to 60 is really about 4.6 to 4.9</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    110% BS.<!-- Signature -->
     
  3. what 4.9 to 4.6? go 2 the mbusa has the car with 349hp with a 0 to 60 time of 4.9 sec thats 110% BS?
     
  4. I'll take this anyday. My only problem is that all AMGs have autos, so I might reconsider.<!-- Signature -->
     
  5. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from Emdec55</i>
    <b><!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from 300CE24_RULE</i>
    <b>4.4 ??? hahaha

    And why not 4.0 or 3.8 ???

    it's more like 4.8 to 5.0 .</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->what r u talkin about 4.0 or 3.8?</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    I mean there are stat for all these cars. OK the manufacturers stat are a little wrong but not wrong of one sec.
    When I hear someone who says this C32 can do 4.4 , why not 4.0 or 3.8 ???? no end <!-- Signature -->
     
  6. 4.4sec was only if it waz right for the car but the real time for the mbusa with 349hp is 4.9 but really the time for this car is 4.9 or 4.8 to 4.6sec
     
  7. 4.6 OK, maybe but not under.

    It's an auto. So it doesn't depend on the pilot .<!-- Signature -->
     
  8. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from BMW 2002</i>
    <b><!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from Al</i>
    <b>just a shame the bmw is slower than the merc. if the bmw was faster the merc is still a better car.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    i believe the test by MT or one other magazine came up as the M3 0-60 as 4.65s and the C32 as 5.1 therefore making the M3 faster ;)</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    Just cuz it can go to sixty doesnt make it a faster car...duh!
    Try the 1/4 mile, 0-100, top speed, or slamon test.
     
  9. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from Gamer55</i>
    <b><!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from BMW 2002</i>
    <b><!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from Al</i>
    <b>just a shame the bmw is slower than the merc. if the bmw was faster the merc is still a better car.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    i believe the test by MT or one other magazine came up as the M3 0-60 as 4.65s and the C32 as 5.1 therefore making the M3 faster ;)</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    Just cuz it can go to sixty doesnt make it a faster car...duh!
    Try the 1/4 mile, 0-100, top speed, or slamon test.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    I'd be glad to give those figures

    M3:
    Acceleration:
    0-100mph: 11.6 seconds
    1/4mile: 13.3@106.8
    Braking:
    60-0mph: 112 feet

    C32 AMG
    Acceleration:
    0-100mph: 12.2 seconds
    1/4mile: 13.6@105.4
    Braking:
    60-0mph: 118 feet

    Sourced from Road & Track. They don't have handling stats for the M3, so I leave both out of the comparison. So there we have it, it seems the M3 is a faster car<IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif"><!-- Signature -->
     
  10. Sourced from Autocar
    Mercedes C32AMG
    0-60-4.6secs
    0-100-10.8secs

    BMW M3
    0-60-4.8SECS
    0-100-11.2SECS

    The Mercedes C-32 can do a 4.6sec 0-60 run.<!-- Signature -->
     
  11. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from carreraRS</i>
    <b>Sourced from Autocar
    Mercedes C32AMG
    0-60-4.6secs
    0-100-10.8secs

    BMW M3
    0-60-4.8SECS
    0-100-11.2SECS

    The Mercedes C-32 can do a 4.6sec 0-60 run.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    so the official time is 5.2, and they managed to make it go 4.6 ??
    that's amazing :~

    the C32 is much better though, because,
    1)more luxurious
    2)more ocnfortable
    3)4 doors, so definitly more useful
    4)as fast or even faster then the M3<!-- Signature -->
     
  12. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from G1zm0</i>
    <b><!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from carreraRS</i>
    <b>Sourced from Autocar
    Mercedes C32AMG
    0-60-4.6secs
    0-100-10.8secs

    BMW M3
    0-60-4.8SECS
    0-100-11.2SECS

    The Mercedes C-32 can do a 4.6sec 0-60 run.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    so the official time is 5.2, and they managed to make it go 4.6 ??
    that's amazing :~

    the C32 is much better though, because,
    1)more luxurious
    2)more ocnfortable
    3)4 doors, so definitly more useful
    4)as fast or even faster then the M3</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    Its a lot slower than the M3, much much much slower.<!-- Signature -->
     
  13. this is not true AT ALL
    give me some proof.
    the C32 AMG has more power then the M3, its as fast or faster....and for the rest, just better.
    as i said before, not everybody could make that car go 0-60 in 4.9 sec
    the auto, gear box sets the acceleration time at 5.1, this being available for ANYBODY. Especially you could never get it to go 0-60 in even 5.4, since your so dumb.<!-- Signature -->
     
  14. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from G1zm0</i>
    <b>this is not true AT ALL
    give me some proof.
    the C32 AMG has more power then the M3, its as fast or faster....and for the rest, just better.
    as i said before, not everybody could make that car go 0-60 in 4.9 sec
    the auto, gear box sets the acceleration time at 5.1, this being available for ANYBODY. Especially you could never get it to go 0-60 in even 5.4, since your so dumb.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    Yeah, its much much faster, the shitbox automatic doesn't let you shift the gear at the best time, so it slows you down, you want some proof? Well here it is.

    Angus<!-- Signature -->
     
  15. Sorry, having some trouble uploading the image.
    I'll try again.

    Angus<!-- Signature -->
     
  16. Sorry guys, can't upload the pic because it isn't a JPeg, anyone know how to change that?

    Angus<!-- Signature -->
     
  17. #42 Angisio, Aug 10, 2002
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
  18. and so ??
    yeah the M3 has a stick, this is why its faster on a track, but on the stree there would be no diffeence what-so-ever...
     

Share This Page