Re: For all you Skyline enthusiasts! Here's an F-body to go aga

Discussion in '2000 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 Concept' started by bigvic, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. There's an lt1 z28, however with a forged up motor with a thumper turbo running 230 mph in the 1/4.

    Go click on the picture under my sig, don't know why they put the pic there but that's the car I'm talking about.



    For those of you that don't know anything about these things, they run anywhere between 106mm and 130mm turbos that can be found on in the big turbo 18-wheeler engines.


    If anyone can build the blizt skyline then anyone can build on of these, just takes guts and money, however there isn't a dyno made for cars on this planet that can measure the hp from this car.


     
  2. that Buick GN still had a big displacement for a v6. and whats the deal with the v6, couldn't they make an inline six like new Ford XR6 turbo (Twin Turbocharged 4L inline six)?
     
  3. LOL, i couldn't agree more!
     
  4. I couldn't have said it better myself,That POs camaro is no match
    for a tuned SKYLINE GTR V-SPEC.
    Ummm anyways Imports Rule !!!!!!!
    Domestics=shit!
     
  5. I am getting annoyed by your constant insults. We talk cars here, not the IQ of people.
     
  6. The post just before you posted this was about cars. And if you don't think "You = Stupid!" is not an insult, some wires are not connected right in your brain. Insult cars you don't like and not peoples intelligence that post against the cars you like.
     
  7. The post just before you posted this was about cars. And if you don't think "You = Stupid!" is not an insult, some wires are not connected right in your brain. Insult cars you don't like and not peoples intelligence that post against the cars you like.

    Peace!

    BTW I am done in this forum because I don't like the way in which you corect people that know less about F-Bodies than you.
     
  8. I thought we were making fun of Skylines here not other fellow American muscle machines.
     
  9. How can you make fun of SKYLINES you shit for brains,**** YOU!!!!!!!
    IMPORTS RULE
     
  10. MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA TRUE,SO TRUE,LOL
    P.S. IMPORTS RULE!!!
     
  11. With big slicks, and with big slicks many of these cars could do so, big slicks arnt street legal, and i doubt whatever power it has its smog legal, other cars with slicks, entirely stripped interior, and a 7000 hp engin run fives, id look at it but the site doesnt work so until then ill just doubt your not bullshitting
     
  12. Are you replying to someone or are you just stupid.
     
  13. What crack are YOU smoking? or are you just a glue victim. You seem to have a misguided inferiority complex about the misdeeds your "honourable" country has comitted.
     
  14. u damn americans, u did not win WWII!!!! please let me remind u that the british actually done a lot more damage in world war 2. and there is a little song which goes like this about u americans in WWII:
    "we fly our flying fortress at 20,000 fett, 20,000 fett, at 20,000 feet. we fly our flying fortress at 20,000 feet but we've only got a tiny little bomb." u damn americans flew your b-17s and b-21s at stupidly high altitudes, and sometimes bombed your own men!! the avro lancaster crews carried 22,000lbs of explosives compared to your americans sub 10,000lb bomb load, and the lancaster often flew at sub 1000ft! i know, this has nothin to do with cars, but i dont care. and as for nukin japan into the stone age, i think u will find that they are years ahead af the world in technology. peace.
     
  15. u damn americans, u did not win WWII!!!! please let me remind u that the british actually done a lot more damage in world war 2. and there is a little song which goes like this about u americans in WWII:
    "we fly our flying fortress at 20,000 fett, 20,000 fett, at 20,000 feet. we fly our flying fortress at 20,000 feet but we've only got a tiny little bomb." u damn americans flew your b-17s and b-21s at stupidly high altitudes, and sometimes bombed your own men!! the avro lancaster crews carried 22,000lbs of explosives compared to your americans sub 10,000lb bomb load, and the lancaster often flew at sub 1000ft! i know, this has nothin to do with cars, but i dont care. and as for nukin japan into the stone age, i think u will find that they are years ahead af the world in technology. peace.
     
  16. Well, despite what Hollywood, American war films, and action films would have you believe, that's not actually true.
     
  17. World economics has little to do with how technologically advanced a country is, really only marketing strategies, and who can plan how to make the most profit. That doesn't mean America is more advanced, just good at affiliating themselves with major income sources.

    I think I'm beginning to see why you didn't see anything wrong with what Seansvette wrote.

    Back to the topic.

    On the track, I think the N1 Skyline could easily take this. Even if it is designed to handle fairly well for a Camaro, it pales in comparison to the Skyline.
     
  18. well you obvioulsy wouldn`t compare this ith a normal Skyline so lets be fair and use the Skyline Blitz.
     
  19. Have ANY American cars broken the gas mileage record of 76mpg on a production car? not even close, there's just one example. What about a concept car with 400hp, 450lbft torque that gets 40mpg? there's another example, but I think I'll end it there.

    Well, if you're going to look at space engineering and technology, the CANADA Arm is widely considered by NASA engineers to be the most advanced piece of technology used on the space shuttle, just because Canadian engineers developed something that NASA engineers were unable to, doesn't mean that Canada is more advanced than the US, so why should the fact that Japan hasn't bothered to create a space flight program really have anything to do with it?

    I'd consider the ZL1 vs. the N1 Skyline a more reasonable comparison, the ZL1 would more than likely dominate the GT-R, whereas the N1 Skyline (despite having approximately 1/2 the power) would likely be a fair comparison on a track, though likely not in acceleration.


    LOL, I like the way you broke down "ASSUME"
     
  20. well your the one who compared it with a Skyline. "For all you Skyline enthusiasts! Here's an F-body to go against". Obviously you didn`t do your homework. you dont compare a Skyline to a Camaro ZL1!thats why I said use the Blitz to make it half fair. Plus the Blitz has amazing handling. I bet this car hasn`t go any handling. Please go to the BMW M3 CSL page and go to the forum called M3 CSL vs Ferrari Enzo vs Toyota Landcruiser
     
  21. but only in the 1/4
     
  22. Sure twin turbos all ou need is two turbos new ecu new injectors and dual overhead cams. hmm zr1 vette 350 and there we go
     
  23. Re:

    **** you the record 1/4 mile ever is like 5 so screw you your street legal shit.
     
  24. Uh yeah, that 5 second 1/4 raises many 'BS' flags...

    Top fuel runs mid-4's. Funny cars run high 4's. Pro stock runs 6's.This is with 6000+hp, and you think this "street legal" 2000hp car can run 5's? Try again.

    Beeeeeeeee Essssssssss........
     
  25. i hav a vid. of this car runnin 9.55...2 bad i cant post it <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/sad.gif"></A> they should change it
     

Share This Page