Re: Gimme a Benz ML 55

Discussion in '2000 BMW X5 Lemans Concept' started by fizzle, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. Gimme a Benz ML 55

    this x5 looks like crap. id take an ML 55 anyday. o-60 in 6.4 secs is crazy. bmw, stick to the Ms
     
  2. Gimme a break. Let's see the ML55 set a record on the nurburgring as the X5 Le Mans did.<!-- Signature -->
     
  3. Why doesn't everyone shut their big pizza filled golden teeth mo

    It's Mercedes versus BMW..........

    Here's what I think......

    If you want engines...MB
    If you want a cool looking coupe....BMW
    If you want a cool looking sedan.......BMW
    If you want nice roadsters...........BMW
    If you want a car that massages your ass...MB
    If you want nice concepts...MB
    If you want motorbikes..BMW (well, duh)
    If you want buses and truck...MB
    If you want SUVs.....BMW

    There it is.
     
  4. you guys seriously think they're gonna build this thing. BMW has aboslutely none, none whatsoever plans to build this concept.<!-- Signature -->
     
  5. this is is jus a motor an a half wat can i say?
     
  6. k i m a Bemmer lover and first thing if u by a $70000(canada dollers) car y would u take it off road (its like takeing a mini van and going drag racing. it defets the perpus) i meen by a jeep grand charakee laredo and if u want more luxuary by a jeep grand charakee limited. then u can go off road and dont have to worry if u brake some thing cuz if u do u can by mopar rart eneywhere, bmw and benz r not as easy to find.

    both ml55 and x5 were made 4 street use not offroad. thow it is a suv (spots utitlity veical meen not offroading but if u have to go over some ruffer groung u can.) its goust to much $ to go offroading and if i had that kind of money to wast i would by a a a vette or a m3 fully modify it and do street racing.

    but still if off roading with $70000 is your thing then i dont care.

    but all and all dont compare a ml55 amg which is a MODIFIED version of the ml 500 to a bmw X.5 4.6 which is a fully perduction not modified suv. but still bmw maniges to beet the ml55 with a perduction car so all u benz lovers pick on a car compeny that is your size not bigger and better and faster
     
  7. Yeah man, ML55, fastest production SUV in da world. Screw the ugly "concept' piece of crap. But I hate SUVs no matter what. But I will choose the ML55 if I HAD to.
     
  8. Ya, BMW's V12 X5 Lemans is so much better than ML55, besides ALL Mercedes SUVs are butt-ugly, BMW SUVs are so much more slick lookin. Its also not always about speed, this would be hella fun off road, and up in the mountains.<!-- Signature -->
     
  9. You guys have got to remember that this car doesn't really compare with the ML55 because it was never intended to make it into production. It was a one off designed to explore the performance envelope on an SUV like the X5.
     
  10. AMG is the best <IMG SRC="http://www.supercarforums.com/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif"><!-- Signature -->
     
  11. yeah I can handle the amg truck. but #$%# you #%$gots praising this peice of turd like its god. its a stupid concept car.<!-- Signature -->
     
  12. I agree, stupid concept car. If I put a CLK-GTR engine into a ML55, let see whose boss. The fact is that the fastest PRODUCTION SUV IS THE ML55
     
  13. im beginning to see a trend here...winner: ML!!!!
     
  14. #14 SurfRat, Aug 9, 2002
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
    Here's a little news for all you retarted Mercedes lovers. Go over to www.bmwusa.com and check out the new BMW X5 4.6is. The rightful owner of the title "Fastes Production SUV in the WORLD." Don't EVER try to argue that Mercedes' are better than Bimmers. You'll just shut yourself down again...and again...and again. Trust me losers...it's not a battle you can win.<!-- Signature -->
     
  15. Just a little info for all of you the man is right the fastest suv prize is currently held by bmw for the x5 4.6 and to add this concept is phat as hell i would be more than happy to have that in my garage the ml55 which i have driven is sadly out done handleing wise by the bmw x5 4.4 sport and i can only assume that the 4.6 not only bests the ml55 in handleing but from what i have read speed and acceleration as well. AMG is a great line of cars and no question compares with the M line of bmw. In some cases beats some M models but unfortunatly this is not one of those cases. Also when BMW comes out with the M version of the X5 it will put the ML55 to shame.
     
  16. what's this crap about ML55 being better than the X5??? you're comparing a 5.5 liter engine with 4.4 liter...i don't think that's fair. let's see, the BMW X5 4.6HP, that's like 0.9 liters less than the ML 55 will be enough to kick its butt on the straights and corners. if BMW were to make 5.5 liter engine for the X5 you're probably only going to see dust left behind by it...oh sorry, did i make you cry??? may those tears you're pouring out is enough to wash the dust of your ML55.

    mercedes benz makes a nice line of luxury cars, so please, stick to your day job of manufacturing luxury cars and stop trying to compete with BMW on performance 'cause i'm starting to feel sorry for you!
     
  17. Oh yeah DAVUT. Wait till they make an M version of the X5. Then we will see what's the fastest SUV in production. By the way, why are you comparing a tuned AMG ML 55 to a un-tuned Bimmer X5.

    ML 500 vs. BMW X5 4.0 BMW will kick mercedes' ass.

    ML 320 VS. BMW X5 3.0 BMW will again kick ass.

    So stop comparing models in different categories.



     
  18. haha ML55 man this is obviously that fastest SUV on the planet....BMW is so sick
     
  19. Unfortunately, you haven't made me cry yet. X5 4.6 is faster than a ML55? Okay, maybe that's true, but you know why? Cuz the stupid Bimmer SUV can't even go off road, it's a SUV designed for the streets (ironically), which defeats the whole purpose of a SUV (go read the "Why do ppl like SUVs" forum).

    You want performance, then why the FU@K would you buy an SUV.
    Okay, but the X5 4.6 is faster. Fine. I take that.

    But Bimmers always faster than Mercedes? Haha, go check out the specs of a M3 and the new AMG C32, and see for urself who's faster.
     
  20. ML55 looks stupid and crap, anyway, a Pajero EVO is better than a fu@king MB SUV.
     
  21. Alright Davut, you asked for it.

    Okay, moron. I don't know if you have read my last two posts, because you are acting like a complete idiot by all this crap you are spewing out of your mouth. So guess what? It's time to shut you down again fool.

    'M3 faster than C32? Haha, just want magazine do you guys read?'

    Well, loser...the stats I obtained came directly from mbusa.com. No magazine at all actually.

    'C32's 0-60 time is 0.2 seconds faster than M3 with an automatic transmission.'

    Um...I'm not sure where you learned math, but the M3 has a 0-60 time of 4.6 seconds. It is not available with a automatic transmission, unlike the C32, the M3 is a sports car. The C32 AMG has a 0-60 of 4.9. And, I don't know about you with your messed up Mercedes-Loving mind, but that gives the M3 a .3 second FASTER 0-60 time. Get it right, loser.

    'Why doens't the C32 come with a manual?'

    I'll tell you why. Cause Mercedes is not focused on sports cars at all. They are purely in a market for "Over-The-Hill" snooty rich people who don't know the difference between an automatic and a manual. Not to mention almost every other aspect of a car.

    'Personally I think that's stupid too, but hey, if it did come with a manual, then the M3 couldn't eat its dust cuz it will be so far ahead of it.'

    What the heck is the matter with you loser? Stop living in a dream land. "IF"!?!?! Oh, well yeah, and if BMW made a car with a rocket strapped to the back of it, nothing could beat that either. Retard.

    'There was the 8 series which was a total failure. Basically nobody liked it and nobody bought it.'

    Don't EVEN get me started on how many cars Mercedes has had to discontinue or completely remodel due to low sales. You think you would at least know a little about the company you love so much before you attempt to shut another company down for something Mercedes is so well known for.

    'Cuz it's so ugly compared with the Mercedes SL class.'

    If you think BMW had lost sales of the 8 Series to the SL class, you are more retarded then I orginally thought you were.

    'When BMW said the Z8 is suppose to compete in the luxury sport market, I almost choked, cuz it's less luxury, less sporty, and much uglier than the new SL class to come.'

    Live in the now fool. Compare cars that are in production with cars that are in production. You'll find every aspect of the current SL class can not EVEN come close to competeing with the Z8. If you don't believe me. Say so...I will prove it.

    'And oh yea, the M-powered Z3 coupe? again, no one bought it cuz the SLK looks far too much better...'

    "...far too much better..." Wow, I didn't even know it was possible to write with such grace. Where the hell did you learn to write, moron. And you are comparing two sports cars (well the bimmer is a sports car, I don't know if I can say the same about the SLK) purely on looks?! Wow, you have really reached a new low. Looks are 100% opinion. You can NOT judge anything by looks my friend. Haven't you been through Jr. High? I think Mercedes are ugly as crap. But if they could outperform a BMW in every aspect, as the MRoadster does to the SLK, then the best performing car would be the better car. Hands down, no questions.

    '...who cares if it was faster?'

    Um...are you an ididot? The MRoadster could not only outperform the SLK in 0-60 times, but in slalom, braking, and 0-100-0 as well. Get your facts straight loser.

    'It seems that the 3 series is the only line of BMW cars that are relatively successful, that is before this generation of C-class came out.'

    Um...excuse me? But where the hell have you been for the last 10 years? Go and check caranddriver.com and remind me...how many times has Mercedes been on the Top Ten Cars list? Oh...yeah...that's what I thought.



    Hey alright! What'da ya know folks. That about wraps up another session of an MB pansy shut down. Davut...thanks for being an easy target. Maybe next time you'll research your facts a little harder with that slow-working brain of yours. And like I said before, "Don't EVER try to argue that Mercedes' are better than Bimmers. You'll just shut yourself down again...and again...and again. Trust me losers...it's not a battle you can win."<!-- Signature -->
     
  22. you gotta be kiddin me, any of you guys that dis this SAV. This is the best friggin SUV ive ever seen!!!! Damn guys get some taste! O don't see any ML55 with 700 bhp, nor any with a top speed of 173 mph! This thing is faster than most of the cars BMW makes. If they really turn this concept into the real thing, then the ML55 would be gettin screwed up the exhaust pipe by this!!!
     
  23. #23 Magnus, Aug 9, 2002
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
    Ok... a few things I noticed in this thread:

    Someone mentioned that "bmw gets V8 power out of V6 engines"...well, you're kinda right, except BMW doesn't make V6s. They avoid them like the plague. Check out http://www.bmw850csi.de/engines_e.html as to why.

    Someone else said "but AMG has a new engine ready to roll, a 457hp monster... The X5 4.6i won't be holding the title for too long". But what they forgot to mention is that this 457BHP engine will probably have huge displacement. BMW could get 150 more horsepower out of an engine of that size, I'd wager. So that fact alone sorta cripples your claim (or your hope).

    And I saw mention of a "Z3M"? are they talking about the M Roadster?<!-- Signature -->
     
  24. #24 MAB062183, Aug 9, 2002
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from Magnus</i>
    <b>Ok... a few things I noticed in this thread:

    Someone mentioned that "bmw gets V8 power out of V6 engines"...well, you're kinda right, except BMW doesn't make V6s. They avoid them like the plague. Check out http://www.bmw850csi.de/engines_e.html as to why.

    Someone else said "but AMG has a new engine ready to roll, a 457hp monster... The X5 4.6i won't be holding the title for too long". But what they forgot to mention is that this 457BHP engine will probably have huge displacement. BMW could get 150 more horsepower out of an engine of that size, I'd wager. So that fact alone sorta cripples your claim (or your hope).

    And I saw mention of a "Z3M"? are they talking about the M Roadster?</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->
    It depends. The M Roadster is the M (for Motorsport) version of the Z3 Roadster. The M Coupe is the M version of the Z3 coupe. I would imagine that the one he is talking about is the M Roadster, since the Z3 Roadster is the version most commonly associated with "Z3." Good question.
     
  25. that page about the engines was very enlightening, i knew bmw focused mainly on inline 6s but i didnt know why...
     

Share This Page