Re: Supra Owns SS

Discussion in '1998 Chevrolet Camaro SS Coupe' started by Mistertwo, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. Supra Owns SS

    these things are pretty fast but come on, no competition for a supra, or a skyline, besides Ive heard these things break pretty easily,
     
  2. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from Mistertwo</i>
    <b>these things are pretty fast but come on, no competition for a supra, or a skyline, besides Ive heard these things break pretty easily,</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->
    ummm...okay you can't comapre a twin turbo supra to a stock SS.Your stupid!!!
     
  3. yeah the supra might be able to take a stock camaro SS, but with the 10,000 or so dollars you saved by buying a camaro, you get get 400 hp out of the engine and then kick the shit out of any stock supra. (but thats not a fair comparison, stock vs mod.) Any ways i think the camaro looks better and no they don't break down easily i knew someone who had one and it lasted him way over 100,000 miles. (it was a '95 i think)<!-- Signature -->
     
  4. God! Why is it always I heard or I think! SHow us real proof that american cars break down! ugh so ignorant!<!-- Signature -->
     
  5. The supra is not that much quicker to sixty than this. By the way this site says that this car does sixty in 5.5 but i think that i conservative. i have read in a couple of magazines that this car does sixty in 4.9 to 5.1 and one of the magazines was a mustang magazine!<!-- Signature -->
     
  6. A supra also costs 10 grand more then this.
     
  7. <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from ilovefastcars</i>
    <b>A supra also costs 10 grand more then this.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->Well not anymore, theyre all used.<!-- Signature -->
     
  8. Well my moms 91 accord has 240k kilometers on it, which is like 150 or so miles, and I practically redline it every time I change gears (slight exageration). Im not trying to say this car isnt fast, especially if you dump money into them, it will haul ass, no argument there, but I just am trying to say that as far as looks go, I dont think this can compare with a supra, especially if it has a nice body kit, and I just think that the supra would probably be an all round better racecar, (around the curves), as for drag racing goes, its probably cheaper to mod up a camaro, since its domestic, but if we were in japan it would be cheaper to mod up a supra, so basically, its all opinion, and I just gave mine. no disrespect to f-body fans, btw did you know their made in canada.
     
  9. as far as power goes...a stock camaro more than likely beats a stock supra...

    as far as looks...i absolutely HATE the camaro look since it was changed from the 80's-early 90's model...the 93 model supra and newer models is my favorite car body ever...
     
  10. OK, the SS is a #$%#ing tight ass car. Lots and lots of power. But the Supra's engine is by far one of the if not the most advanced stock engine ever built. The 2JZ-GTE STOCK, can take boost upwards of 25psi, producing about 800rwhp. The SS is a very awsome car, but still cannont and will not ever be able to compete with the reliablity of a Japanese car. The LS1 engine has stupid amounts of pushrod and rear axle problems. They are both ingineous cars, but the Supra is untouchable.
     
  11. A supra does not own this car and american cars do not break down easy.

    Also if you think no camaro will ever be able to beat a supra you need to look at the zl1.<!-- Signature -->
     
  12. And why? I'm not saying that american cars breakdown easily, I have a WS6 myself. I have beat Supras, and Supras have beat me. But the LS1 can't compete with a 2jz-gte.
     
  13. The Supra?...how about an R32 GTR?<A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/smile.gif"></A> Or, if that's too fast for you, you can opt for a Stagea RS260. Exact same engine, exact same drivetrain, Station Wagon body (400lbs heavier)....and that runs a 12.9 quarter<A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/smile.gif"></A>.
     
  14. what are you alking about? the ss does a 12.9 int he quater...maybe not the 98's but the newer ones do. and plus the supra was more expensive so id rather have the camaro
     
  15. Are you #$%#ing insane!!!!!!! I havent seen a more stupid argument! A stock SS would ***** slap the supra's ass any day!!!!! So you think if you put Quad Turbos in youre supra and reach 1000+ HP on it then Its the best car!!!?? FUK YOU!! Put a supercharger on a SS and kiss its ass at the starting line becuase you wont be able to see it after that! Im dead serious too. Fuk the Supra, Camaro ALL THE WAY.
     
  16. Y do these ignorant people think supras are the sh*t. I don't get it. They ARE nothing without a turbo. Does an SS have a charger??? NO!!!!!!!!!!!! it doesn't. go back to an import forum and talk about ur dream of turning that pos into a 3000 hp car that u never will. As, for skylines, well their large quantity in america sure puts them into competition with american cars dont they?
     
  17. i tottaly agree the ZL1 and the SS will beat the hell outta supras!!
     
  18. i wouldn't say the break down alot i have a camaro z28 and i haven't had anything go wrong with it and i run the piss out of it. and i have a freind that has a supra and its always in the shop.i drove it once and it was leaking oil after i got done with it. so much for depeadablity.
     
  19. yes the supra is fast but man come on no stock supra and skyline stands a chance. when it is put up to a camaro ss or trans am!
     
  20. i don't know where you get that at an r34 only runs a 13.9 stock so like my salty balls
     
  21. ARE YOU IN A MENTAL INSTITUTION, THE TOYOTA SUPRA COST MORE,
    IS OLDER THAN A 1998 CAMARO SS, AND IT HAS T-TURBO, WITHOUT THOSE
    HOOTERS, THE SUPRA IS NOTHING, MY BROTHER OWNS A 1999 CAMARO SS, AND
    EVERYTIME WE SEE A SUPRA, THEY'RE AFRAID OF THE CAR, EVEN THOUGH WITH
    OR WITH OUT T-TURBO ,THE SS WILL MOP ALL OVER A SUPRA.


    "PISS ON IMPORTS"

    CAMFREAK

    MUSCLE CARS 4-EVER

    IF YOU WANT TO SEE THE 5TH GEN CAM CHECK THE LAST PIC.
     
  22. Sorry kid, but that's where you are wrong. 160 MPH beats 155 MPH, and their acceleration time is just about the same.
     
  23. Sorry, but it's true. I think Camaro engines are better than Supra engines. I mean come on. The Supra needs a turbo, while the Camaro SS is a naturally aspirated engine. As much as I like the Supra, the Camaro kills the Supra, straight up.
     
  24.  

Share This Page