Sort of ugly? Only 254HP

Discussion in '1986 Ferrari GTB Turbo' started by Ferrari Dude, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. <!-- Signature -->
     
  2. Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP

    Only 254HP, check displacement, then YOU tell Ferrari how to do it better...right!<!-- Signature -->
     
  3. Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP

    indeed , only a 2L
     
  4. Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP

    Hey, it's better looking than the 308 and more powerful. If you want to insult a Ferrari, do it to that.
     
  5. Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP

    I agree! it should be 354!
     
  6. Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP

    LOOK WHEN IT WAS BUILT MAN. IM SURE IT WAS CUTTING EDGE TECHNOLOGY WHEN IT CAME OUT. JUST LOOK AT IT THAT WAY.
     
  7. Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP

    for ferrari 254BHP is very cheap, they can do better, but this year that error will never happen again...

    ferrari #1<!-- Signature -->
     
  8. Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP

    160 mph is really not bad for that horsepower. Well, maybe it is, I don't know. I know that it will never happen again in a Ferrari.<!-- Signature -->
     
  9. Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP

    At least it looks cool.<!-- Signature -->
     
  10. Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP

    No don't rag on the 308,lol.I like it and would love to own one.
     
  11. Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP

    i think it looks very good, and has quite some performance for a 2.0 liter...150 mph, not bad. I wouldnt mind owning one
     
  12. Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP

    of course this is an 80s car things will only get better at ferrari
     
  13. Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP

    me neither
     
  14. Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP

    You really fit in the indies dont you?
     
  15. Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP

    ferrari screwed up big time here. they work magic with n/a but they shouldnt touch a turbo. sure it's a 2 litre engine that puts out 250 hp? that's crap for a turbo honda can do that w/their engines. and yeah it does go 150...so what my mom's van goes 120 and it's got 200 hp and weighs a hell of a lot more
     
  16. Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP

    You should take greater heed of your 'Three Steps' programme.

    Take another look at the specs, remember this car is from the mid-Eighties, and reconsider your opinion.
     
  17. Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP

    pretty crappy car...
     
  18. Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP

    Looks really nice, but should have a slightly bigger engine...not a bad top speed though.
     
  19. ITS FROM 1986 you @#$%head
     

Share This Page