Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP Only 254HP, check displacement, then YOU tell Ferrari how to do it better...right!<!-- Signature -->
Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP Hey, it's better looking than the 308 and more powerful. If you want to insult a Ferrari, do it to that.
Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP LOOK WHEN IT WAS BUILT MAN. IM SURE IT WAS CUTTING EDGE TECHNOLOGY WHEN IT CAME OUT. JUST LOOK AT IT THAT WAY.
Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP for ferrari 254BHP is very cheap, they can do better, but this year that error will never happen again... ferrari #1<!-- Signature -->
Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP 160 mph is really not bad for that horsepower. Well, maybe it is, I don't know. I know that it will never happen again in a Ferrari.<!-- Signature -->
Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP i think it looks very good, and has quite some performance for a 2.0 liter...150 mph, not bad. I wouldnt mind owning one
Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP ferrari screwed up big time here. they work magic with n/a but they shouldnt touch a turbo. sure it's a 2 litre engine that puts out 250 hp? that's crap for a turbo honda can do that w/their engines. and yeah it does go 150...so what my mom's van goes 120 and it's got 200 hp and weighs a hell of a lot more
Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP You should take greater heed of your 'Three Steps' programme. Take another look at the specs, remember this car is from the mid-Eighties, and reconsider your opinion.
Re: Sort of ugly? Only 254HP Looks really nice, but should have a slightly bigger engine...not a bad top speed though.