SSC news? THIS is SSC news

Discussion in 'American Cars' started by Atomic2, May 18, 2007.

  1. Um, what else would it have? It looks like shit inside and out and is based on a kitcar.
  2. #27 Northalius, May 19, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
    Nah, it doesn't look like shit inside, nor out. You're just an ass that likes to hype up BS like the others, simply because it's an American car.

    If it had a Ferrari symbol on it, or Bugatti, you'd most likely say it's a good car.

    Stop the BS. <A BORDER="0" HREF=""><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/smile.gif"></A>

    Nice interior:

    Not original exterior, but not bad looking:

    Be honest, and give credit where credit is due, without the negative hype, as the other following sheep out there. <A BORDER="0" HREF=""><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/smile.gif"></A>
  3. #28 944turb0, May 19, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
    You're the one whos retarded for thinking the only thing anyone could possibly see wrong in this steaming turd is the fact that it's American. There's no difference between this and any other supercar to you? You're #$%#ing dumb as a brick. Ironiclly, dumbasses like you also ruin the reputation of American cars by blindly defending any turd made here just because it's made in the USA.
  4. Yes, I didn't expect you to actually point anything out that is backing YOUR ignorant statements. I don't have to worry about your baseless words against me, since the facts are on my side of the argument. You're just an ignoramus.

    I don't defend any American car; you can see me trash the new Ford Taurus in another thread recently.

    I only defend the good ones that others BLINDLY (the irony how you say I blindly defend, yet you blindly!) judge, because of their ignorant bias.

    Get a brain, stop being a sheep. <A BORDER="0" HREF=""><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/smile.gif"></A>
  5. It has nothing
  6. #31 GTRFreak, May 19, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
    You claimed to post a picture of a nice interior but I didnt see one...
  7. watch out for 944turbo, hes very stuborn as a MOFO.
  8. The facts are not on your side since pretty much anyone with half a brain agrees with me.
  9. Northax vs. Rocka lol
  11. "The facts are not on your side since pretty much anyone with half a brain agrees with me."

    Yes, you're right. Anyone with only half a brain would agree with you. If they had a whole brain, they'd agree with me. <A BORDER="0" HREF=""><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/smile.gif"></A>

    <A BORDER="0" HREF=""><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/wink.gif"></A>
  12. The SSC is a car with potentiall

    unfortunately, the company is spending too much time making claims then actually working on making the car more appealling.

    still, its performance is spectacular, but untill they either actually go 273 MPH, or make it look better, most people here wont respect it
  13. I stand by the fact that people wouldn't be nearly as anti SSC if they didn't talk so much shit. It's not an original looking car for sure, but it's not that horrible looking either.

    If they'd just actually beat the top speed record and kicked ass at the other stuff(which it does from what I've read) and not talked shit about it so much before hand I bet people be like "Sweet! Kinda boring looking though." instead of bashing it endlessly.
  14. I can't believe Northax thinks the interior looks nice
  15. #40 Archaeopteryx, May 20, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
    It's not "simply because it's an American car." The reason is that it makes outrageous claims of performance before the car is tested, and uses these theoretical claims to say that "WE'VE CREATED THE FASTEST CAR IN THE WORLD" when they've not done any tests to prove they have.

    If this had a Ferrari symbol on it, a lot of people here would lose a tremendous amount of respect for Ferrari.

    Now, the interior. It looks amazingly shitty. Whoever designed it has no imagination, taste, and is probably better of designing coffee tables and footstools. It looks horrible.

    The exterior? Apart from ripping off several supercars (90s ones, that is), it manages to look badly proportioned, awkward, and awful, despite the fact that its profile is very similar to awesome-looking cars such as the Lamborghini Diablo. And dude, it uses Ford Focus headlights that don't even fit the car.

    Here's what you should do. STFU, and get some sense into you.
  16. It's utter garbage.
  17. Translation: "I have nothing to contribute nor do I have any idea what people are talking about."
  18. ur sh1t
  19. Northax is a raging moron
  20. pretty much

    i mean it seems the performance is excellent [better then the enzo] but if theyre gonna be making such big claims, they better have backed them up first

    cause even if it IS the fastest, we dont know that and it just falls under the same catagory as the Barabus and all the other wannabe supercars
  21. Ferrari
    A: wouldnt make these kinda claims
    B: would have some possible credibilty to said claims due to past history.

    This is why the car is bashed.

    Its ugly/generic, makes wild claims, and has no prior history of awesomeness to back them up.
  22. Exactly.
  23. Also ferrari never states a top speed, and when they do they understate it
  24. Yes, it was in Monaco because SSC sent one for display at the "Top Marques Monaco" event.

    Not even the monegasque with the worst case of Down's Syndrome would ever buy one.

Share This Page