1. This is just a formula, with a new engine and some more mods, the hood, and the inside.
    There were only 25 made
     
  2. Re: Sweet

    bahahaha, 4.6 sec, ya, right! it would be believable to make a fire bird do 4.6 sec TODAY, but highly unlikely in 1992. yes preformance will go as far as the dollar will go, however no matter how much money u spend u cant break the law of physics, i am sorry but a car that acient with only 350hp at 5500rpm is not gonna do 4.6 sec when it weighs close to 4000lbs! thats a joke<!-- Signature -->
     
  3. Re: Sweet

    You underestimate the power of SLP <IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif"><!-- Signature -->
     
  4. Re: Sweet

    Tuned and only 350HP! what a joke a typpically example of an american tuning company who can't tune 'just increase the cubes'.<!-- Signature -->
     
  5. Re: Sweet

    4000ibs? are you blind? or youre just bad in math? its 3400. its closer to 3000 then 4000.

    not that i like this car, but its damn possible to do 4.6 with 350@5500. its ligher then a 2000 mustang cobra R(1628kg/3589lbs) that has not mutch more power(375bhp) and does 0-60 in 4.4<!-- Signature -->
     
  6. Re: Sweet

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from greghourigan</i>
    <b>bahahaha, 4.6 sec, ya, right! it would be believable to make a fire bird do 4.6 sec TODAY, but highly unlikely in 1992. yes preformance will go as far as the dollar will go, however no matter how much money u spend u cant break the law of physics, i am sorry but a car that acient with only 350hp at 5500rpm is not gonna do 4.6 sec when it weighs close to 4000lbs! thats a joke</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    Your post was a joke,

    4.6 was achieved with manual transmission, a skilled driver and a weight to torque ratio of under 9.<!-- Signature -->
     
  7. Re: Sweet

    Is the posted performance of this car that unbelieveable?
     
  8. Re: Sweet

    My friend has a 88 GTA, with all kinds of SLP Shit...suspension,a big 305 with many mods, huge dual exhaust, K&N... all kinds of SLp crap, and it has been dynoed at 350 horse,around 360 torque, its a 4 speed auto, and it went 13.8 Quater mile and 4.9 0-60, and he didnt have too much rubber....so with a stick, and prolly better done car, because this is the actual thing, it easily does the 13.2 and 4.6 times, because my friend can lift his front tires off the ground when hes accelerating....that shits fast as ****..just last night he beat a 308 ferrari by like 6 car lenghts <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/smile.gif"></A> few other victims were older vettes, Cam SSs, mustang GTs, and a few imports...i love that car! this car rules! so dont trah talk this thing, i cant think of too many american cars that wenre made in the 60s that i would want besides this one....Later dudes
     
  9. Re: Sweet

    Dumbass, 3400lbs doesn't even round to 4000lbs. What a #$%#ing loser!
     
  10. Re: Sweet

    Your friends car sound like a total beast, I love the look of those GTA's, and I've seen a few done up that really shook the ground. The really nice thing about the 92 is its total sleeper appeal. Imagine the shattered egos as you leave them at the lights.....especially idiots in their sewing machine sounding, coffee can exhusted, Playstation equipped, sticker covered imports. Ah, the sweet smell of molten rubber.....
     
  11. Re: Sweet

    its faster than your supra, regardless of cubes...and it doesnt have two turbos making 300HP, its N/A asshole. this engine can push out 600 N/A horsepower if they wanted it too, but it would smoke to many imports.
     

Share This Page