Re: 575M Maranello is better Hey guys, how about we just say that both cars are great, and would be great to have? End of story.
Re: 575M Maranello is better Well first off, the 575M is lighter than the 550M Mafalda not heavier and Maranello is a racingtrack and who the f*ck cares about their names when u're contesting superiority in performance???? Anyhows, the Murcielago is fantastic, a dreamcar in every way. It will pleasure u until the end of time or until u crash it, wichever one comes first <IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif"> Performance wise I believe the Murcielago will stick it to the 575M everytime. I guess us Ferrari-lovers whill have to rely on the F60 to beat the Murcielago but until that day Lamborghini is king of the road. Well c u and Ferrari Forever! PEACE
575M Maranello is better This car can be described in a few several ways: -Good looking -Too expensive -Crappy name (What the #$%# is Murcielago, i live in America not #$%#ing italy!) -Weak compared to the 575M Maranello Think about this logically (if you idiots can). The 575M has more upgrade potential, is FR drivetrained, allowing for more power output to be produced and is way cheaper than this overpriced ugly yellow piece of crap. Sure it looks nice but yellow? I want to think of power and destruction when driving a car in the color red, not beautiful little daffodils when driving this yellow ugly shit color. I'll take the 575M over this anyday. For a lower price, you can buy that car, put some extra cash in it to surpass this car, and still have money left over to buy a nice Corvette, knowing that you've still spent less money than you normally would have purchasing little Ms. Pretty Daffodil.
Re: 575M Maranello is better 550Koenig, good for you, buy a 575 M Marabello and have fun. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.<!-- Signature -->
Re: 575M Maranello is better I just read a magazine comparing the 575 marenello,murcielago,mercedes 55 amg and the porsche 911 gt2. the lambo shat on the ferrari in excelleration. it beat it from 0-300km by about 8seconds!! It is mid engine and 4wheel drive so it is better balanced for handling and has kick as acceleration + it is one of the best looking cars on the road today!!! but when the F60 comes out ...well well well....<IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif"><!-- Signature -->
Re: 575M Maranello is better How is the 575M better than this car? Cause it comes in red?? Jeez is there better excuse than that? People buy these cars cause they need little or NO mods at all, i mean how much more quicker do want a street legal monster like this to go? You my friend are an idiot. I live in Australia and I like the name of this car (weired that u complained about it having an italian name, but u like ferrari), i could say i don't like the sound of american cars but i am not stupid. Grow up and stop being immature, this car was engineered with the help of Audi, who made vast improvements to the car (ride, seats and a host of other things). So you go and dream about buying ur ferrari but don't come in here bagging this beast unless u have something better to complain about other than its color.<!-- Signature -->
Re: 575M Maranello is better this car is faster and in my opinion is better looking, but it is all up to the individual taste, my personal taste is that of mid-engine cars, i like the look, but the facts show that when both are in stock form the Mrc hammers the Ferrari, even with its upgrade in bhp and torque, there is nothing but facts to show the Lambo is better!!! but u like the Ferrari and i must say that is no bad choice in itself, it is an incredible machine, but that is ur choice and this is mine, peace<!-- Signature -->
Re: 575M Maranello is better You cannot compare Maranello an Murciélago, are too different!!! p.S. Lambo ia too heavy, 1850kg with fuel...
Re: 575M Maranello is better wow it weighs more with fuel...ya don't say!!! you must of studied physics or something!! next thing ya know your gonna tell me the ferrari weighs more with fuel in it aswell.<!-- Signature -->
Re: 575M Maranello is better I still would rather take a Lamborghini than 575M Maranello.... <!-- Signature -->
Re: 575M Maranello is better Ok, some of you are literally killing me with your stupidity. Every Ferrari that has a name is named after a town in Italy. The factory is in Modena, hence the 360 Modena. Maranello is a town, etc. Lamborghini has chosen some odd names. The word countach translates into "wow" in english, stupid name. The word Diablo means devil obviously, if you don't know tht you should be put to sleep. The name Murcielago was the name of a famous bull so they named the car after the bull considering Lamborghini's symbol is a charging bull. As far as quality goes, throughout the years I have been reading about how Ferrari has been unparalleled with their attention to detail and craftmanship. This theme appears in articles about every single model, except for a few in the 1980's when sports cars sucked. Go look up some historical reviews of Ferraris and I'm sure you'll notice this trend. The Maranello is a great car. I've never driven one but the idea I get from reading so much about it is that it has the refinement of a luxury car yet it can run like a race car. I think one british writer from CAR magazine put it best -"The Maranello is like a body builder poured into an Armani suit"
Re: 575M Maranello is better Murciélago is tested by Auto 1/01: Auto tested 550 Maranello too,12/1996: weight was 1700kg, with fuel or if you prefere, 1850kg with fuel, driver and Correvit (Quattroruote, 5/2000). http://www.supercars.net/Pic?s=6&y=1997&m=Ferrari&o=550%20Maranello&t=9&msg=1&pn=a.jpg I donÂt know 575MÂs weight, but Ferrari declairs +40kg than 550, I think the effective weight is app. 1750kg. 550 is a very handler, I suppose 575M is better http://www.supercars.net/Pic?s=6&y=1999&m=Lamborghini&o=Diablo%20GT&t=17&msg=79&pn=a.jpg http://www.supercars.net/Pic?s=6&y=1999&m=Lamborghini&o=Diablo%20GT&t=17&msg=79&pn=b.jpg http://www.supercars.net/Pic?s=6&y=1999&m=Lamborghini&o=Diablo%20GT&t=17&msg=79&pn=c.jpg Mafalda
Re: 575M Maranello is better is there any real compairison here. stop bickering. Murcielago rules. and stop insulting the lambo's name. if you dont know what it means atleast be proffesional and find out what it means before your critisize. you americans like everything simple. its an italian car, not american keep that in mind. <!-- Signature -->
Re: 575M Maranello is better There's not a real compairision, cause anyone have not tested 575M. But, I repeat, are too different (Exp, 575M has front engine...).I don't want insulting Lamborghini, I like it!! I say only Murciélago is too heavy to be a perfect sport car.. but I like it, VERY MUCH!! Mafalda
Re: 575M Maranello is better this car is better than the 575 if you dont belive me check the numbers. And no one better say anything about a road race because with being mid engine and an awd system from its new parrent company audi (who by the way is the best in the world at awd) it becomes even more in the lambos favor. The only problem with this car is that it is too heavy, not as heavy as the ferrari, but the added weight from the awd system is well worth it
Re: 575M Maranello is better Uh hey stupid shit, diablo means from hell not satin. and just because it is named after a town doesn't mean it is a better name i have been to those towns you go first then come back and tell me how great the name is. plus i don't know about you but when i see a #$%#ing countach driving down the road i say "wow!!!" yet i love ferraris but i would rather a lamborgini
Re: 575M Maranello is better 550Koenig... your an ASS... 1) you wish you would live in Italy.... 2) "more upgrade potential" ?? lol! you cant afford the rims.... if you want to say your opinion... say it without all of the shit... maybe if you would ask a normal question... you would get normal answers...<!-- Signature -->
Re: 575M Maranello is better koenig ur the biggest retard in the world #%$got this car is amazing and murcielago is a great name it comes the name of a bull from the 1800s that fought for its freedom check out lamborghini.com
Re: 575M Maranello is better Maybe you guys should know more then one language! You guys don't know shit about what any of the words means and where they come from! first of all 72stingray should be killed! you don't know shit about what diablo means! the word means Devil! i know beucase my dad knows italian and i knwom spanish which is very similar! also the name murcielago means bat! if you guys don't know what they are, their the little flying animals that live in caves and stuff! and yes it was named becuase of that guy in the 1800's! but the word means bat! so is that clear! if you guys are gonna say shit i suggest that you jump off a bridge! <!-- Signature -->
Re: 575M Maranello is better lol ..just cuz a car is yello and don't have a name u don't know! don't make it bad! i think this car mayb the better out of the 2! it looks good its faster! and don't make fun of its name! i think the name Murceilago is a fightin bull?right or wrong? i love the ferrari 550 or 575m but u don't need 2 say crap about this thing! this a beautiful car!
Re: 575M Maranello is better yeah i think the word diablo means devil.....Lamborghini Diablo or Devil
Re: 575M Maranello is better yeah bat! the name of the bull waz.....bat? bat is the name of a fighting bull?
Re: 575M Maranello is better <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from mpritz</i> <b>Ok, some of you are literally killing me with your stupidity. Every Ferrari that has a name is named after a town in Italy. The factory is in Modena, hence the 360 Modena. Maranello is a town, etc. Lamborghini has chosen some odd names. The word countach translates into "wow" in english, stupid name. The word Diablo means devil obviously, if you don't know tht you should be put to sleep. The name Murcielago was the name of a famous bull so they named the car after the bull considering Lamborghini's symbol is a charging bull. As far as quality goes, throughout the years I have been reading about how Ferrari has been unparalleled with their attention to detail and craftmanship. This theme appears in articles about every single model, except for a few in the 1980's when sports cars sucked. Go look up some historical reviews of Ferraris and I'm sure you'll notice this trend. The Maranello is a great car. I've never driven one but the idea I get from reading so much about it is that it has the refinement of a luxury car yet it can run like a race car. I think one british writer from CAR magazine put it best -"The Maranello is like a body builder poured into an Armani suit"</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->hey there you really think the ferrari is better???lets see.... first we look at the present and the future we dont look at the past.... second of all u cant find anything wrong with lambo so u gimme shits about its name?? i mean who gives a #$%#....