these suck ass

Discussion in '1998 Chevrolet Camaro SS Coupe' started by SupraMan77, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. who ever said that the camaro is a poor mans corvette is absoutly right. the comaro has the corvette engine, but the rest of the car is total crap. the interior looks like trash, and its all cheap ass plastic, and it handles no where near the supra or a corvette. as for the engines i dont care what you say, the supra engine is a way nicer engine than the one in the camaro. you can easily get over 1000hp out of the supra engine and use it as a daily driver. you would be able to get more out of the chevy engine but it will be in the shop more than it will be on the road. also you are lucky to get 100,000 miles out of a camaro, but 100,000 miles on any toyota is just broken in. the cockpit of the supra in way better, the stereo is nice, the dash looks clean and the plastics do not look like total cheap crap, like the chevy's. the supra does 0-60 in 4.8 seconds and the comaro is 5.5. you get what you pay for; a supra costed 40-50 because it was fast, handles, is dependable, has nice materiels in the cockpit, and is a altogether well engeneered vehicle. the chevy is cheap because it is basically an engine first and a car second. the engine is nice, but the rest of the car is total junk. no one can deny that chevy fit and finish, and quality control is trash, plus the cockpit is full of tons of left over gm junk. the car is poorly designed, and always had recalls no matter what model. (the supra had none by the way). for what the chevy is it is not that fast either. i actually saw a 99' for 9 grand yesterday. when you can hardly find a 99 honda accord for 9 grand you know that the comaro is crap.
     

Share This Page