This is wrong.....so very very wrong.

Discussion in '1986 Lamborghini LM002' started by barefoot driver, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. Re: This is wrong.....so very very wrong.

    All things aside though, this car was completely crap in STUNTS.
     
  2. Re: This is wrong.....so very very wrong.

    Who are you to decide if Lamborghini should be making SUVs or not. Are you an engineer?<!-- Signature -->
     
  3. Re: This is wrong.....so very very wrong.

    its not wrong its grear its GREAT! like the others said lambo made tactors and this is just a step up. Its a sweet SUV thats fast and safe isnt that what everyone whants....thats real people
     
  4. Re: This is wrong.....so very very wrong.

    THere reason you see them all the time is because those are the only two states where people have them.
     
  5. Re: This is wrong.....so very very wrong.

    well at least they were really good SUVs. it raced in the Paris-Dakar race and won.<!-- Signature -->
     
  6. Re: This is wrong.....so very very wrong.

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from Mclaren</i>
    <b>you are so right, this discraces the name of lamborghini</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE --
    great way to make your first post dumbass. lamborghini is the bull in spirit and in form. its cars exeplify, if anything else two things power and presence. this is not really was never designed to compete in the same market as ferrari but to pose a sort of supercar alternative. ferrari is the prancing hoarse and lamborghini is the bull. amerithech (the f-1) is not either of them. it is a monstrosity that unless suited up for le mans or in gtr form could not do anything but go in a straight line very fast. the f1's succes i accredit to an exceptional bmw engine. if you want to talk about a discrace to lambos name look at the bravo concept. but this...this more than many other lambo vehicles exemplifys the spirit of the bull. if you dont understand that piss off and go post somewhwere else
     
  7. Re: This is wrong.....so very very wrong.

    Here are some quotes from Car & Driver's Brock Yates & Autocar.

    Brock Yates:
    "Once the tach needle sweeps past 5000 rpm, the LM002 sheds its street clothes and begins to operate like something out of DC Comics. The big engine howls unearthly tones through its dual exhaust and suddenly one is seeking out 3-series Bimmers, 300E Mercs, and unready Z28 Camaros. To shock and humiliate their hapless drivers is one of the more civilized urges one gets behind the wheel of this leviathan."

    As for handling and stick, it did surprisingly - no, astonishingly -well on curvy roads, and braking power was amazingly high. Off road, "the surprisingly supple Lambo suspension soaked up the impacts like a sprinting tiger. The brute is pure feline when it comes to rapid off-road transit - truly the best such machine we have ever encountered."

    Autocar:
    "With the works driver, something of a Kamikazi pilot, we drove up a hill with an angle of 30 degrees, which the LM took with great ease. It was followed by a 50-degree hill. In either case the car just climbed. One has to depend very much on the car since the only thing you can see in that situation is the hood. Now on to a 70-degree hill. We aren't sure if we would like it but, once again the car just climbed upward. Bystanders reported the front wheels coming off the ground. We should be in the Guinness Book of World REcords by Now."

    I think you are right, this wrong....so very much wrong. ARE YOU COMPLETELY NUTS!!
     
  8. Re: This is wrong.....so very very wrong.

    It definetely doesn't make sense but that doesn't make it crap! It's a friggin' Lamborghini!
     
  9. Re: This is wrong.....so very very wrong.

    This thing is quite amazing. It has the same engine as the Diablo, costs £350 to fill the tank, each tyre costs £1,500 (side walls reinfored with carbon fibre), and for a pub quiz answer General Khandfi has a few of them..lol.But yeah Id rather have this than a Hummer..jsut to be filthy rich really.<!-- Signature -->
     
  10. #35 Welle, Aug 10, 2002
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
    Re: This is wrong.....so very very wrong.

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from Bartman3322</i>
    <b>What is so wrong about a lamborghini suv? Porsche is making one. Who cares? It looks phat too. There is no way that I would turn one of these down. And it must have had a production higher than 300 because I see them all the time in California and Florida.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    http://www.lamborghiniregistry.com/LM002/LM002Registry.html <!-- Signature -->
     
  11. Re: This is wrong.....so very very wrong.

    Do you know something MegaFan.Lamborghini started making trakters and makes also now trakters
     
  12. Re: This is wrong.....so very very wrong.

    No, its not wrong. it was designed for the military but the design from AM general won out. its offroad performance wasn't that great, it had a independent suspension that didn't give much wheel travel for real rough terrain. the lm002 was made for fast desert/baja type transport. Lamborghini should do a remake of this animal but 1000lbs lighter.
     
  13. Re: This is wrong.....so very very wrong.

    Damn Nice car. I would Love to have one. <!-- Signature -->
     
  14. Re: This is wrong.....so very very wrong.

    More than two people in the states have them. Read the Dupont registry of automobiles and you will see at least 6 for sale, so obviously more than two people have one. <!-- Signature -->
     
  15. Re: This is wrong.....so very very wrong.

    The design may be a little boring,but IT'S A LAMBORGHINI!!!!!! It's all about performance u dumbasses. Having a lambo would be sweet, but having a lombo that posseses the rarity of this, would be downright hype!! It's a sick ass SUV!!! does hummer have performance like this baby? no!! so just shut up. THIS IS COOLER THAN THE PORSCHE CAYENNE!!!
     
  16. THIS IS WRONG

    THIS WAS A MISTAKE. tHE ONLY PEOPLE WHO COULD HAVE OWNED THIS THING MUST HAVE BEEN OIL TYCOONS. . . IT ONLY GOT ABOUT 8 MILES TO THE GALLON AND IT WAS EXTREMELY OVERPRICED. aLTHOUGH IT WAS DIFFRENT, WHICH ATTRACTED MANY OF ITS BUYERS, THIS CAR STILL WAS SHIT ON WHEELS. OH YA, THE TOPS SPEED ON IT IS WRONG, IT WAS ONLY 125 M.P.H.
     
  17. Re: THIS IS WRONG

    its top cruising speed was 100 mph. it had the 5.2l quattrovavole engine producing 450hp and 450lb-ft of tourque. its top speed is in excess of 150mph as quoted from the press release when it was first seen in 1986. 300 were sold. and of them almost half were sold in Saudi. who cares how many mpg they get... they hold enough gas to get you as far as a hummer. and this is an hugely more powerfull vehicle
     
  18. Re: THIS IS WRONG

    Id rahter own this than a Hummer<!-- Signature -->
     
  19. Re: THIS IS WRONG

    WOW! this car is amazing. Colonel Gadaffi bought about 100 for his army, so he isn't all bad!

    Its oue of those casr that if you came head on with a line of smaller cars, down a narrow back street, all 7 of the cars that are coming the opposite direction would HAVE to reverse to get out of the way, in fear of being run over
    <!-- Signature -->
     
  20. Re: THIS IS WRONG

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from MoneyDudes</i>
    <b>THIS WAS A MISTAKE. tHE ONLY PEOPLE WHO COULD HAVE OWNED THIS THING MUST HAVE BEEN OIL TYCOONS. . . IT ONLY GOT ABOUT 8 MILES TO THE GALLON AND IT WAS EXTREMELY OVERPRICED. aLTHOUGH IT WAS DIFFRENT, WHICH ATTRACTED MANY OF ITS BUYERS, THIS CAR STILL WAS SHIT ON WHEELS. OH YA, THE TOPS SPEED ON IT IS WRONG, IT WAS ONLY 125 M.P.H.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    the speed is right this is one of the best off-road vehicles out ther next to the hummer it is extremely fast, faster then any other SUV out there so just shut up<!-- Signature -->
     
  21. Re: THIS IS WRONG

    Its not wrong... You are wrong! This is a luxury sport utility vehicle! It has LOADS of power, since the countach's engine is
    powering it. Ya, its got bad MPG, and everyone seems to be infactuated
    with its topspeed. That does'nt matter! The fact that it can tackle
    pretty much Any terrain is good enough for me... This thing is great!<!-- Signature -->
     
  22. Re: THIS IS WRONG

    Exactly what is a "Twat"?<!-- Signature -->
     
  23. Re: THIS IS WRONG

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from LamboOwner</i>
    <b>Exactly what is a "Twat"?</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->
    heh heh heh, ohh, you slay me. A "twat" is another word for a womans... how shall I put it... "genitailia"<!-- Signature -->
     
  24. Re: THIS IS WRONG

    Moneydudes topspeed is right. . . . all of you are wrong. . .so very wrong. . .

    P.S. Ya genetalia...<!-- Signature -->
     
  25. Re: THIS IS WRONG

    this thing has immense hauling power, and it doesn't take an hour and a half to go 10 miles an hour like the hummer which has 150BHP<!-- Signature -->
     

Share This Page