Re: THIS IS WRONG Moneydudes topspeed is right. . . . all of you are wrong. . .so very wrong. . . P.S. Ya genetalia...<!-- Signature -->
THIS WAS A MISTAKE. tHE ONLY PEOPLE WHO COULD HAVE OWNED THIS THING MUST HAVE BEEN OIL TYCOONS. . . IT ONLY GOT ABOUT 8 MILES TO THE GALLON AND IT WAS EXTREMELY OVERPRICED. aLTHOUGH IT WAS DIFFRENT, WHICH ATTRACTED MANY OF ITS BUYERS, THIS CAR STILL WAS SHIT ON WHEELS. OH YA, THE TOPS SPEED ON IT IS WRONG, IT WAS ONLY 125 M.P.H.
Re: THIS IS WRONG its top cruising speed was 100 mph. it had the 5.2l quattrovavole engine producing 450hp and 450lb-ft of tourque. its top speed is in excess of 150mph as quoted from the press release when it was first seen in 1986. 300 were sold. and of them almost half were sold in Saudi. who cares how many mpg they get... they hold enough gas to get you as far as a hummer. and this is an hugely more powerfull vehicle
Re: THIS IS WRONG WOW! this car is amazing. Colonel Gadaffi bought about 100 for his army, so he isn't all bad! Its oue of those casr that if you came head on with a line of smaller cars, down a narrow back street, all 7 of the cars that are coming the opposite direction would HAVE to reverse to get out of the way, in fear of being run over <!-- Signature -->
Re: THIS IS WRONG <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from MoneyDudes</i> <b>THIS WAS A MISTAKE. tHE ONLY PEOPLE WHO COULD HAVE OWNED THIS THING MUST HAVE BEEN OIL TYCOONS. . . IT ONLY GOT ABOUT 8 MILES TO THE GALLON AND IT WAS EXTREMELY OVERPRICED. aLTHOUGH IT WAS DIFFRENT, WHICH ATTRACTED MANY OF ITS BUYERS, THIS CAR STILL WAS SHIT ON WHEELS. OH YA, THE TOPS SPEED ON IT IS WRONG, IT WAS ONLY 125 M.P.H.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE --> the speed is right this is one of the best off-road vehicles out ther next to the hummer it is extremely fast, faster then any other SUV out there so just shut up<!-- Signature -->
Re: THIS IS WRONG Its not wrong... You are wrong! This is a luxury sport utility vehicle! It has LOADS of power, since the countach's engine is powering it. Ya, its got bad MPG, and everyone seems to be infactuated with its topspeed. That does'nt matter! The fact that it can tackle pretty much Any terrain is good enough for me... This thing is great!<!-- Signature -->
Re: THIS IS WRONG <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from LamboOwner</i> <b>Exactly what is a "Twat"?</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE --> heh heh heh, ohh, you slay me. A "twat" is another word for a womans... how shall I put it... "genitailia"<!-- Signature -->
Re: THIS IS WRONG this thing has immense hauling power, and it doesn't take an hour and a half to go 10 miles an hour like the hummer which has 150BHP<!-- Signature -->
Re: THIS IS WRONG <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from tiger005</i> <b>this thing has immense hauling power, and it doesn't take an hour and a half to go 10 miles an hour like the hummer which has 150BHP</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE --> I agree with your point about the hummer but in your signiture I have to say that the c4 sucked. I didnt like how it looked at all so I wouldnt exactly call it a beauty.<!-- Signature -->
Re: THIS IS WRONG it is wrong, but porsche are gonna bring out their cayenne and you dont see any one whining about it.<!-- Signature -->
Re: THIS IS WRONG The only time I've seen one of these I was amazed. This sort of 4-wheeled cruiser has been made in 1986 but has anticipated the market's tendences of 13 years. It was a luxury off-road like nowadays could be the Cayenne; I can understand those who said it is a mistake, but at Lambo sre not surely short-sighted
Re: THIS IS WRONG THIS IS SOO WRONG ITS THE MOST HIDEOUS THING IVE EVER SEEN AND Y WOULD THEY EVEN TRY THIS GODDAMIT LAMBORGHINI YOUR RUINING YOURSELF
Re: THIS IS WRONG the speed is not wrong the CAR IS WRONG. sorry Lamborghini but id rather own a Pinto. <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/sad.gif"></A>
Re: THIS IS WRONG your a F***ING #%$ man I bet u have no freinds.. dude! this thing is like the GOD of all off road vehicles u need to understand y u should b put in a mental hospital! i will list 5 reasons 1) Your stupider than a cows S**T 2) You think that miles to the gallon matter when the gas tank is twice the size of your pathetic little cardbord box house. 3) You made me take the time out of my day to reply to your stupid ass 4) This thing could kick the S**T out of a hummer any day, and it should be used by the army instead of the hummer 5) And last but not least your account on this web site should be deleted along with your F***ING stupid message !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (click on the picture and read the caption)
Re: THIS IS WRONG WHat the hell Diablo? This car really does suck...for 450 Hp its slow as hell!!!!Id rather own Hummer anyday! Plus I would like to add that skylines suck! I know its off road , but admit it the top speed an accelertaion suck for its performance.. I mean A common V8 will outperform this v12 As they always DO! thats why V8s Rule!
Re: THIS IS WRONG V8s suck skylines and and lamborghinis are way better than any hummerh2 or corvette.if a lamborghini came across a corvette it would get smoked! lamborghini will aways be a v8 corvette KILLER! and the skyline will aways be a caddy KILLER. Face it there is no corvette out there that looks as good as a lamborghini. the countach still turns head today even if it was made in the 1980s. the corvette on the other hand can,t. The Lambo LM still looks better than any other suv all you need to do to it to make it look better is put 24 inch rims on it. Hummer H2 is a yellow box of crap on wheels. the corvette could never beat a lamborghini in a street race without some mod like a turbo and the skyline is the greatest 4wd car from japan what a matter dont want to get your car dirty?
LM 002 was a cool idea at the time, and it also was very fast for an SUV at the time. It probably broke down all of the time, too, as it was using a countach engine. Which would explain why only a joke military would use them, but at least you would die in style!