Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Car Comparisons' started by amenasce, Oct 29, 2004.
New time -> Lotus Exige S: 1.25.1
This week the stig is going for the lap record in the CCX<A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/smile.gif"></A>
anyone else doubt it will happen?
With a wing its capable of posting a lap no other car would be able to touch.
how much downforce does these "wing" make?
update the list you tard
Why dont people just see the obvious.. BLAME THE BRIDGESTONE TIRES!!!
revised koenigsegg CCX (with rear spoiler):
so, a wing made it 7 seconds faster!
only .8 faster than the less powerful zonda F though <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/tongue.gif"></A>
is the wing gonna be an option for CCX customers now? cause that was pretty much the perfect lap, and it didn't break down....amazing
I knew you'd get here first <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?displayFAQ=y"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="pitlane/emoticons/tongue.gif"></A>
OMG...I knew it would rape everything
I think its time for someone to take this list over and start updating it. WHose in charge of this?
is there a video?
0.8 seconds better with over 160hp more is hardly raping
CCX = 683hp/tonne
Zonda F = 510hp/tonne
i'd be disappointed if it wasn't faster
if i wasnt downloading 14 seperate links at 99MB each i might have got here first!
That's still a pretty big difference for a small track
after many attempts and over 800 bhp
What about the Z4M??
True considering the Z06 and Enzo are only 3.4 seconds apart.
1 min 26.0secs
it has at least 166hp more (i say at least as it could be as much as 204hp more depending on trim. not sure which F they tested)
EDIT: and weighs less
faster than the M5. crazy
Raging Bull, thank you.