TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

Discussion in '2001 Honda NSX-R Concept' started by Davut, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    will938: you fokking dipshit!!! american cars DO NOT, WILL NOT, and absolutley will NEVER be cars that can corner!!! I don't know about you Fokk ups but acceleration and pulling mad G's in the corners is TONS better than going 200 MPH<!-- Signature -->
     
  2. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    Grizz2K4: I guess that makes you a real "fokking" idiot. Lets see here.....it takes a $80,000 import to even come close to the performance of a ZO6, which gets a G on the corners...you're retarded if you think that's bad for a stock car. Maybe you should look around and research your stuff before you open your mouth.
     
  3. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from Will938</i>
    <b>Lets see here.....it takes a $80,000 import to even come close to the performance of a ZO6b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->
    seems that you are mistaken, I'm not denying this test nor am I denying that my spelling sucks, but I have seen a Z06 go in2 a course with alot of turns a be overcome by a civic, my eyes don't lie to me this was one of the funniest moments I've seen of import dominance over the popular domestic supercars, and last time I checked Civics cost a low I think like 15 Grand? and as far as the Z06 V the NSX it's the same price range they are expected to preform closely, I really don't care witch handles better it doesn't matter as long as you know the limits of your car I just prefer imports because they are more efficent and the look alot better.

    PS I've been a Toyota fan from day 1<!-- Signature -->
     
  4. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    All of you are stupid! Did you expect the 150 thousand dollar supra to beat the 1 million dollar+ mclaren?! Of course not!!! The mClaren isnt that great! Most car manufacturers (except the big american three) could produce a car that fast if the were given the budget to make a 1 million dollar car!! The question is... would you rather have 1 mclaren or over 10 slower supras, and probably your own racetrack for that matter, with which you could race all of your friends!!<!-- Signature -->
     
  5. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    Its not about the price. Its about the performance. No car stock can match the mclaren. McLaren has an extensive F1 Racing history. Toyota doesnt. Neither does Honda. The McLaren is flat out, one of the best cars ever made. It will outhandle anything on the road, and out accelerate most anything thats not a top fuel dragster(or any of the dragsters) Its just a damn good car. Supras Look nice. But could never handle on par with the F1. Just wouldnt happen
     
  6. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    How about a Lamborghini? I know it's still out matched, but it shoul be a close race. rite? <!-- Signature -->
     
  7. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    Voices: A Civic couldn't pull a G to save Jesus, just because some guy in a Civic overtook a REALLY bad driver in a ZO-6 doesn't mean anything. I really don't believe that unless the Civic was heavily modded or had a pro. driver, and then that wouldn't qualify as from the factory ready. A Civic is an economy car and is absolutely outperformed in every aspect by the ZO-6 minus mpg and price.

    BTW - How did this even start, I never said anything about American cars being able to corner well until Grizz said something :Þ.
     
  8. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    it would take a lot of work, but fifth and sixth gen civics could maybe get close to a G. certainly not the new ones, because they have shocks and struts. ugh.
     
  9. Mclaren aint all that

    Dude it is about price. You know why every manufacturer doesnt make a car this fast? Because it is very pricey. Mclaren couldnt have made it this great if it was a half a million dollar car. It all comes down to production budget. And it isnt mclarens f1 racing experience that makes it fast because an f50 is more akin to an F1 car, and ferrari does better in f1 racing.
     
  10. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    If Pontiac had a million dollar budget, they would still churn out the biggest piece of crap known to man. It would probably come out looking like an Aztec and a Firebird had a baby. Heck, you could give Pontiac a 1 million dollar budget, and McLaren a 500K budget, i guarentee that the McLaren would kill whatever Pontiac came out with. Its all about who knows how to make a good all around race car, not just a go in a straight line car
     
  11. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    I would give warren mosler a 1 million dollar budget. That would be fast.<!-- Signature -->
     
  12. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    hey i gave trans am man's mom a million dollar budget, and it was really awesome... jk. where'd that crackhead go anyway. it was kind of fun making him look like an idiot.
     
  13. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    yea retardsearch i agree<!-- Signature -->
     
  14. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    ok, hahaha, let me tell you guys alittle something about great race cars. the C5R corvette, built by the same people who build the trans am (GM = Genius Mechanics), took first and 4th OVERALL (1, chevy...2, audi...3, audi...4, chevy...where's the mclaren?) in the 24 hours of daytona in the le manns series, above the paltry mclarens, above the audis, above the BMWs, above the Porsches, above everything! well shit, a low tech "not supposed to turn" push-rod V8 powered chevy whipped up on all those oh so technologically advanced european car makers. i'm not saying the mclaren or those other car makers mentioned above are shitty, i'm just rebutting the fact that you people think domestic car makers can't make a good race car. well that shit just proved you wrong didn't it! go back to school.<!-- Signature -->
     
  15. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    back to the TransAm.
    TRANSAM- The official car of white trash and rednecks in the U.S.<!-- Signature -->
     
  16. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    Oh great, nice to know racial stereotyping is still going on strong...<!-- Signature -->
     
  17. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    Why the **** would you guys compare McLaren with toyota or honda? It is in a totally different class. It's pretty much a F1 car with a body on it. I'm an import fan, but this is a riduculous argument. Like comparing dynamite with a firecracker. Jesus, look at the price difference. Come on.
     
  18. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    retardsearch, let's hear the paint hp thing<!-- Signature -->
     
  19. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    You dont know what the #$%# you are talking about!
     
  20. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    <IMG SRC="http://www.supercars.net/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif"> lol. thats a good point. hes back you know. i saw that clown in another forum. im surprised he hasnt come back here. he was a funny one.<!-- Signature -->
     
  21. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from dog4life691</i>
    <b><!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from BigWillman</i>
    <b>ok, hahaha, let me tell you guys alittle something about great race cars. the C5R corvette, built by the same people who build the trans am (GM = Genius Mechanics), took first and 4th OVERALL (1, chevy...2, audi...3, audi...4, chevy...where's the mclaren?) in the 24 hours of daytona in the le manns series, above the paltry mclarens, above the audis, above the BMWs, above the Porsches, above everything! well shit, a low tech "not supposed to turn" push-rod V8 powered chevy whipped up on all those oh so technologically advanced european car makers. i'm not saying the mclaren or those other car makers mentioned above are shitty, i'm just rebutting the fact that you people think domestic car makers can't make a good race car. well that shit just proved you wrong didn't it! go back to school.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->

    GM = Genius Mechanics eh? Generic Motors (heard that somewhere else) sounds more appropriate. Did you know those V8 powered Chevy's have all those dynamic breaking thingies on them (one wheel at a time or something like that)? It HELPS them turn, without them, hah... I'd like to see that race again. Question, was Mclaren even running in that race in the first place? As for going back to school, looks to me like there were some well educated drivers in that race. Any car company can strap a rocket to a piece of metal with wheels, call it a car and make it go, but it all falls on the driver in the end. No amount of technology from heaven could get a baby around a track in any car without it driving on rails. And don't give Transamman's mommy a million dollar budget, if she cranked out another Transmman cuz of you, damn you to hell, we only need one idiot, though two would be an even better laugh.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->


    yeah the chevy's have a high tech braking system, so what? why would you compare the 'vette without it? it's just a part of the car. that's like saying, yeah the mclaren is fast, but i'd like to see it try to race without tires!<!-- Signature -->
     
  22. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    as high tech as BMW and Mercedes?

    just put in some Brembo or Baer brakes and you get the power<!-- Signature -->
     
  23. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    But please, don't put it on a vette.^^<!-- Signature -->
     
  24. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from Chii</i>
    <b>But please, don't put it on a vette.^^</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE -->
    yea :p
    just let them crash and..hm...?<!-- Signature -->
     
  25. Re: TransAm Sucks SOOOO bad

    put on fire?<!-- Signature -->
     

Share This Page