ugly stupid and dumb

Discussion in '2000 Saker SV1' started by Mclaren4ever, Aug 9, 2002.

  1. this is just a copycat of other cars!
  2. Re: ugly stupid and dumb

    Once upon a time, Saker said...

    "i know, lets make an cheap immitation of the McLaren F1, except this time lets make it realy SH#T"

    ...And no one lived happily ever after.<!-- Signature -->
  3. Re: ugly stupid and dumb

    you're both morons! if this thing is a copy of a Maclearen f-1 then i'm a damn green homphpobic tomato! it looks more like a Porsche 962 then it does a F-1, or even a Ferrari! you guys really need to get your eyes checked!
  4. Re: ugly stupid and dumb

    Looks like this is the special ed stomping grounds. Sorry I entered.
  5. Re: ugly stupid and dumb

    hey Mclarenking...... how bout you lick my balls fa.ggot ass!!
  6. Re: ugly stupid and dumb

    you are the most ignorant, retarded fool I've ever seen in my life.
  7. Re: ugly stupid and dumb

  8. Re: ugly stupid and dumb

    shut up you idiots, and get a life...for the price this car is as good as it gets, f*cknuts.
  9. Re: ugly stupid and dumb

    This thing looks nothing like a McLaren. You would have to be clueless about supercars to agree that it does!!
  10. Re: ugly stupid and dumb

    design is too edgy, and could be a little smoother, perhaps...other than that, not a bad attempt at an original design.
  11. #11 jackdaniels34, Nov 29, 2002
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
    Re: ugly stupid and dumb

    As far as I know this car is a race car with subaru impreza engine and suspension. (740kg. and 220bhp.)

    Buying cost are around US$30.000,-- WOW!!!!

    Sorry guys I like this car a lot (to race). (in dutch)
  12. Re: ugly stupid and dumb
  13. Re: ugly stupid and dumb

  14. Re: ugly stupid and dumb

    this is a track car....

    it also represents a true race car, with emphasis on being lightweight, powerful, aerodynamic, having large downforce, handling, etc i could go on...

    the car this should be compared to is a turn key ultima (not the kit form)...

    that is its direct competition as i see it...even so, this is more of a race car

    going by looks, the ultima looks more modern, but this has that old school group C racer sort of feel to looks faster and better from all angles except the back...

    put a twin turbo v8 in there you have yourself a car that will outpower and handle any road car full stop...
  15. Re: ugly stupid and dumb

    agree this is more of a sucker then a saker
  16. #16 redragon, Jul 17, 2003
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
    Re: ugly stupid and dumb

    This car is not intentionally a copy of anything, it was designed with being as minimal as possible in mind, whilst having ultimate handling and aerodynamic properties as was possible. Just because some other cars have also used the same good ideas doesn't mean that it is a copy, and at approx. $10,000 American Dollars, I know of nothing comparable, including motorbikes.

    It was designed in New Zealand (the same country that took the Americas cup which is probably why it is getting all this bad feedback) by Bruce Turnbull who has been consistently engineering extremely competitive race machines throughout the last few decades.

    It comes without an engine, and is completely customised by each purchaser and is designed to fit a V8. I personally reckon that the perfect setup for this car would be a modified Mitsubishi GTO (3000GT) 3Litre V6 Twin Turbo Setup as there is plenty of room and lots of air ducts for intercoolers, air intakes and the like.

    For more info to prevent more ignorance, maybe check out
  17. Re:

    your not a king your a ripoff.copycat my a** this doesn't look anything like a mclaren you gotta stop staring at the Mclaren F1 for 24/7
    and start seeing what other cars are there.i cant beleave they vote for a moron for a king but kings dont act like spoil brats.your a ripoff.outside wouldnt do you bad you spend too much time in your garage staring at the Mclaren F1 instead of going out side and get fresh air.but hey i dont feel sorry for moron.ummm i think that Mclaren F1 has brainwash him since he was staring at it for 24/7.
  18. Re: ugly stupid and dumb

    i gess ur a damn green homphpobic tomato
  19. Re: ugly stupid and dumb


    Some points.

    If it looks like anything, its a Dauer, Porsche, 787b, Schauppan... LE MANS type car.

    It looks nothing like a MacLaren

    Its Road Legal

    The example I've seen does a certified 200mph with an NA V8

    An open top version is availible for track racing.

    The whole car, built, running supersonic speeds wouldn't cost more than 10-15,000 US. Even thats exagerated.

  20. Re: ugly stupid and dumb

    Seems pretty sick to me, and it dosent look a bit like a mclaren u retard. but i like the concept tho , putting any V8 in a cheep aerodynamic car. and its only (according to reddragon) $10k!
    so if u want to get a nice fast car this should be your choice 4 about $20k with a nice engine
  21. Re: ugly stupid and dumb

    What is wrong with you people, you think you know it all.

    Let me put you straight.
    This car is built in New Zealand in a little place called Marton (population of 10000 people)

    Now for all you idiots that say it is a mclaren f1 knock off then I am sorry to burst your bubble, but all the saker bodywork was designed and first built in 1989, and it hasn't changed since. I have personally sat in a 1995 saker which was running a highly tuned subaru legacy gt flat 6 twin turbo with about 450 horsepower. It does zero to one hundered km/h (0 to 60 for you american retards) in around 4 seconds.

    so why don't you all be quiet
    P.s Mclaren was founded in New Zealand too, so even if it was a copy of the f1 i am sure old Bruce Mclaren wouldn't have minded too much.
  22. mclaren????????? ferrari????

    #$%# yourself

    it looks like a koenig c62

Share This Page