Re: Ugly i heard that they banned this car from a few races because it was unbeatable. and yes i agree it is but ugly
Re: Ugly Did you see the windshield? It's seperated, looks like they stole it from some kinda plane <IMG SRC="http://www.supercarforums.com/servlets/cMsg/html/emoticons/smile.gif"> keep the faith<!-- Signature -->
Re: Ugly <!-- QUOTE --><center><hr width="90%"></center><blockquote><i>Quote from ProJoe959</i> <b>Yeah, the split winshield is supposed to help a lot aerodynamically.</b></blockquote><center><hr width="90%"></center><!-- END QUOTE --> "supposed to help a lot aerodynamically" My theory is the split windshield causes the air to shed, and miss the rear wing, taking away downforce, and increasing top speed. FYI, Sharp leading edges are only aerodynamic at speeds over Mach 1.
Re: Ugly it may be ugly , but it kicks a 911 GT2...Exeption for the top speed but where except on a race track can you drive at 290+ KM/H ?
Re: Ugly Yeah, the body looks ugly, but it seems to me that only the cockpit shell looks ugly. The rest of the body is hodge-podge, which means its mismatched, so the car's looks don't exactly blend together. It looks ugly because Mosler wants to have an aerodynamically functional car, or that they want to be the laughing stock.<!-- Signature -->
Re: Ugly This is, well... a very strange car. The windshield is ugly as hell. But hey, if it dominated in competition, who cares what it looks like? Racing cars aren't made to be pretty.<!-- Signature -->
Re: Ugly I was gonna say it looks like a modified Porsche 914...and ditch the stealth fighter-like windshield..
Re: Ugly guys u must understand sumthin...i made up the quote "you cannot judge a car by a picture on this website. the true beauty is seeing it in person. no supercar is ugly in real life."
Re: Ugly actually, i would rather have a nice car with sweet stylin, because i dont think id ever need the true power- i mean how many murcielago owners to you think really try and take it to its top speed??