very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Discussion in '2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S' started by FireBird175, Feb 18, 2003.

  1. look at that v-8 no turbo and you get 386 kmh with it thats awesome
     
  2. Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Yeah its really nice!!! >It has a supercharged V8
     
  3. Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    It has a Supercharged V8 bro. And yeah its very nice in alot of ways!<A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/smile.gif"></A>
     
  4. Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    That's pretty awsome, I mean, most supercars now-a-days have turbos to get their speed, but, this is in it's own powertrain category.
    Nothing wrong with being different in power differentiational upgrade.
     
  5. Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    It is very nice indeedy <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/smile.gif"></A> Very good power sprouting from that V8
     
  6. Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    How could I be so stupid! I left out the Nissan R390!
    It's in the category of ITSELF & the R390
    They both supercars with very powerful V8s
    They are in their category together, but I SO wish that
    the R390 had over 600hp, instead of 550hp! Some things
    just suck sometimes I guess.
     
  7. Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    yep! thats rite!
     
  8. Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Zt....Zt....Zt....Zt....Zt....
     
  9. Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    shut up.
     
  10. Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Whateva, Homero<A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/wink.gif"></A>
     
  11. Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    I honestly think this is better than the Mclaren F1. I think the style is better and goes just has fast. Sitting still it looks fun to drive. You would have to be a complete idiot not to like this car!
     
  12. Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Like I've said before it's all about opinion.
    But you do have a point, it is hard to see how someone
    would not like this car.
     
  13. #13 tony r34, May 9, 2003
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2016
    Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Yeah it's a beast <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/smile.gif"></A>
    Check out http://www.koenigsegg.com/pressroom/pressmaterial.asp# for some sweet pics. Some of them are a pretty big though, almost 4Mb.
     
  14. Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Yea, nice pics. Thanx for the link.
     
  15. Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    It would be cool if Koenig modified the Koenigsegg CC.
     
  16. Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    this is an awesome car.
     
  17. Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Really now? I'm sure Koenigsegg appreciates your support. <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/wink.gif"></A>
    I'm just kidding. It's a real badass!
     
  18. Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Really now? I'm sure Koenigsegg appreciates your support. <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/wink.gif"></A>
    I'm just kidding. It's a real badass!
     
  19. Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    EXTREMELY nice... isnt it ironic that sweden produces both volvos and THESE?
     
  20. Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    And, your point? <A BORDER="0" HREF="http://www.supercars.net/emoticons.html"><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="http://speed.supercars.net/cboardhtml/emoticons/wink.gif"></A>lol
     
  21. Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    arent we forgetting saab?
     
  22. Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    I don't know, this thing is already supercharged.
    Besides, that would sound really weird: Koenig Koenigsegg CC8S.
     
  23. Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    its a centrifugal blower so it wouldn't boost much at low speed, but off-boost 4.7 litres in a car is going to be no slouch and, and that boost would come on smooth and strong and be almost lagless - superchargers do lag, but less than a third of that of a turbo in some cases and lag is the same at all engine speeds rather than being worse at low speed.

    i'd actually put this car as better than the murcielago..... doesn't look as cool or have screamin V12 but its better than a slap in the face and it blows the doors off ANYTHING on the road except the mclaren F1

    so this is the fastest car currently in production?
     
  24. Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Good info there mate!

    Well it has better performance than the Murci, but the looks are questionable in comparison to the Murci.

    It should be, but its not officially. Im not too sure aobut that..
     
  25. Re: very nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Hmm, you do have a point, but, it could use a supp'd bod and/or with a wing, diff. wheels(maybe LeMans style wheels-BBS), an upgrade of up to around 700hp or so. --THEN, it'd be even more of a badass.
     

Share This Page